Search results

AbstractNeil Datta's report, Tip of the Iceberg: Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009–2018, examines the funding, activities and interconnections of anti‐gender politics in Europe between 2009 and 2018. It identifies and traces funding, donors, beneficiaries, outputs and outcomes of a rising number of activities aimed at overturning the achievements of sex and gender equality movements of the last fifty years. Demonstrating a significant level of sustained activity by religious organisations, think tanks, charitable foundations, political parties and individuals, the report author argues that anti‐gender positions attract an expanded range of supporters to alt and far right political parties, and are used to draw in new supporters for illiberal politics in Europe.

This contribution takes a look back at the supply and demand model of selection and recruitment, developed by Joni Lovenduski and Pippa Norris in Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament (1995). The core understanding of this model was that candidate selection was an interactive process in which both selectors and aspirants affected outcomes that were organized in several sets of institutions. The model illuminates power in particular institutions – British political parties – and was designed to examine the various effects of the selection process. This contribution reflects on the model and puts forward ideas and arguments about what might be done differently, taking into account the theoretical and methodological innovations of the succeeding generation of scholars who have used the model. It also identifies remaining challenges for research on candidate selection and suggests that the supply and demand model is sufficiently flexible that it can still travel across national, system and party boundaries.