Open Access BASE2011
Countering Questionable Tactics by Crying Foul
Abstract
This is the author's accepted manuscript, made available with permission of the American Forensic Association. ; How do crying foul strategies, such as saying opponents are trying to "terrify" into a decision, pressure opponents to argue well? I submit that crying foul strategies work by making a norm determinate, and by making manifest the badness of the tactic and that the speaker is exercising forbearance. I explain why they generate pressure to repair or abandon questionable tactics, particularly when the norms they bring to bear in a situation converge with those of a broader political culture.
Themen
Verlag
American Forensic Association
Problem melden