Article

Updating the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data: A Response to Gibler, Miller, and Little (2019)

in: International studies quarterly

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

Abstract
In a recent article, Gibler, Miller, and Little (2016) (GML) conduct an extensive review of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) data between the years 1816 and 2001, highlighting possible inaccuracies and recommending a substantial number of changes to the data. They contend that, in several instances, analyses with their revised data lead to substantively different inferences. Here, we review GML's MID drop and merge recommendations and reevaluate the substantive impact of their changes. We are in agreement with about 76 percent of the recommended drops and merges. However, we find that some of the purported overturned findings in GML's replications are not due to their data, but rather to the strategies they employ for replication. We reexamine these findings and conclude that the remaining differences in inference stemming from the variations in the MID data are rare and modest in scope.

Languages

English

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

ISSN

0020-8833 (print)
1468-2478 (electronic)

DOI

10.1093/isq/sqz045

Export