Aufsatz(gedruckt)1982

ON THE CONCEPTUALIZATION AND MEASUREMENT OF POLITICAL TOLERANCE

In: American political science review, Band 76, Heft 3, S. 603-620

Verfügbarkeit an Ihrem Standort wird überprüft

Abstract

RESEARCH ON POLITICAL TOLERANCE HAS MADE SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS IN RECENT YEARS BY IMPROVING THE MEASURES USED TO GAUGE PUBLIC OPINION. MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN DEVOTED TO DEVELOPING INDICATORS THAT CONTROL FOR GROUP AFFECT. CONTROLS FOR ACTIVITY AFFECT HAVE NOT BEEN PURSUED AS VIGOROUSLY. INDEED, MUCH OF THE PROGRESS HAS BEEN ALONG THE LINES OF SPECIFYING TOLERANCE FOR UNPOPULAR POLITICAL MINORITIES RATHER THAN TOLERANCE FOR UNORTHODOX OR THREATENING POLITICAL ACTIVITIES. MORE GENERALLY, TOLERANCE RESEARCH HAS NOT BEEN SENSITIVE TO THE VARIETY OF CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT DETERMINE CITIZEN ATTITUDES IN CIVIL-LIBERTIES DISPUTES. A NEW APPROACH TO MEASURING POLITICAL TOLERANCE IS PRESENTED IN THIS ARTICLE. THE MEASURES DEVELOPED IN THIS APPROACH DISAGGREGATE THE TRADITIONAL MEASURES OF TOLERANCE (SUCH AS STOUFFER'S (1955) SUPPORT FOR "A COMMUNIST MAKING A SPEECH IN YOUR COMMUNITY) IN PARTICULAR, SCALES MEASURING SUPPORT FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY, AND FREEDOM OF POLITICAL ASSOCIATION ARE PRESENTED. AS MULTIPLE-INDICATOR MEASURES POSING CONFLICTS AMONG VALUES, THESE SCALES ARE RELATED TO TRADITIONAL TOLERANCE MEASURES. HOWEVER, BECAUSE THEY REFLECT THE COMPLEXITY AND CONFLICT ASSOCIATED WITH ACTUAL CIVIL-LIBERTIES DISPUTES, THEY WILL NO DOUBT SERVE AS BETTER PREDICTORS OF OPINIONS AND BEHAVIORS IN ACTUAL DISPUTES.

Problem melden

Wenn Sie Probleme mit dem Zugriff auf einen gefundenen Titel haben, können Sie sich über dieses Formular gern an uns wenden. Schreiben Sie uns hierüber auch gern, wenn Ihnen Fehler in der Titelanzeige aufgefallen sind.