The state of the art of hypothesis testing in the social sciences
In: Social sciences & humanities open, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 100314
ISSN: 2590-2911
6626354 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social sciences & humanities open, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 100314
ISSN: 2590-2911
In: Boston studies in the philosophy of science 207
In: Studies in comparative political economy and public policy
Risky Business is a comprehensive look at Canada's science-based policy and regulatory regime. It asks what risks Canadians might be exposed to as fiscal pressures strain the capacity of regulators in areas such as food, drugs, pesticides, fisheries, and the environment. The first part of this book focuses the reader's attention on diverse and major themes and issues that pervade science-based regulatory regimes today. The second part suggests a framework for analysis and endeavours to present both sympathetic and critical perspectives on the inner-workings of regulatory departments and agencies in the area of the protection of human and environmental health and safety. Covering such topics as the organizational evolution of regulatory agencies, regulatory bodies' changing sources and levels of funding, a review of the independence of science, and the increased potential for realization of risk, these essays point to the need for these regulators to operate with openness and accessibility in order to maintain public confidence. Indeed, the contributors argue that this openness is crucial to both democratic governance and the development of innovative knowledge economies.
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 205-225
ISSN: 1552-7441
Recent rhetorical critiques of philosophy and science assume a contrast between rational argument and rhetoric that is inherited from an antirhetorical tradition in philosophy. This article rejects that assumption. Rhetoric is compatible with reasoned discourse in a strong sense originally outlined by Aristotle. Rhetorical analysis reveals the inadequacy of purely demonstrative accounts of rational argument and cognitive accounts of the conditions for rational assent to propo sitions. Social studies of the rhetoric of science, and in particular of credibility claims, need not fall into the forms of relativism and global antirealism with which they have become associated.
There continues to be a vigorous public debate in our society about the status of climate science. Much of the skepticism voiced in this debate suffers from a lack of understanding of how the science works - in particular the complex interdisciplinary scientific modeling activities such as those which are at the heart of climate science. In this book Eric Winsberg shows clearly and accessibly how philosophy of science can contribute to our understanding of climate science, and how it can also shape climate policy debates and provide a starting point for research. Covering a wide range of topics including the nature of scientific data, modeling, and simulation, his book provides a detailed guide for those willing to look beyond ideological proclamations, and enriches our understanding of how climate science relates to important concepts such as chaos, unpredictability, and the extent of what we know
Contains abstracts of publications resulting from Intergovernmental Science and Research Utilization projects. ; Includes index. ; "Intergovernmental science and research utilization, government, academic, industry." ; Cover title. ; Contains abstracts of publications resulting from Intergovernmental Science and Research Utilization projects. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uiug.30112002120936
Hearings to establish the National Science Foundation as an independent agency of the federal government. ; Hearings to establish the National Science Foundation as an independent agency of the federal government. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951d03671185c
At head of title: 79th Congress, 1st session. Subcommittee Print ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
As announced by its title, this multidisciplinary book focuses on the intersection between religion and science fiction. Several perspectives are addressed by scholars from different disciplines: theology, literature, history, music, and anthropology. Thus, gathering a range of distinct voices and approaches, this work edited by James F. McGrath shows how multifaceted and multicultural the science's fiction treatment of religion is
In: The bulletin of the atomic scientists: a magazine of science and public affairs, Band 13, Heft 10, S. 361-365
ISSN: 0096-3402, 0096-5243, 0742-3829
Neither science nor state has ever been transcendentally "neutral," but they have sometimes been made neutral, together, as this paper shows in the context of cold war Europe. The paper explores how the Swiss government tried to "depoliticize" and "demilitarize" new international research institutions in the fi elds of highenergy physics (CERN), space research (ESRO and ELDO), and molecular biology (EMBL) in order to make science neutral. Conversely, this paper investigates how participation in "neutralized" scientifi c institutions supported Switzerland's neutrality policy and strengthened this essential element of its national identity. It thus addresses symmetrically the coproduction of neutral science and neutral state.
BASE
In: Science Advances
We review how the science of studying street protest has changed, identifying opportunities for innovation and collaboration.
In: Eurasian Academy of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 1-9
ISSN: 2149-1348
"Science as Psychology reveals the complexity and richness of rationality by demonstrating how social relationships, emotion, culture, and identity are implicated in the problem-solving practices of laboratory scientists. In this study, the authors gather and analyze interview and observational data from innovation-focused laboratories in the engineering sciences to show how the complex practices of laboratory research scientists provide rich psychological insights, and how a better understanding of science practice facilitates understanding of human beings more generally. The study focuses not on dismantling the rational core of scientific practice, but on illustrating how social, personal, and cognitive processes are intricately woven together in scientific thinking. The authors argue that this characterization illustrates a way of addressing the integration problem in science studies - how to characterize the fluid entanglements of cognitive, affective, material, cultural, and other dimensions of discovery and problem solving. Drawing on George Kelly's "person as scientist" metaphor, the authors extend the implications of this analysis to general psychology. The book is thus a contribution to science studies, the psychology of science, and general psychology"--Provided by publisher