War and the Engineers: The Primacy of Politics over Technology
In: International studies review, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 489-491
ISSN: 1521-9488
37 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International studies review, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 489-491
ISSN: 1521-9488
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 257-261
ISSN: 0010-4140
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 257-260
ISSN: 0010-4140
In: European political science: EPS, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 165-181
ISSN: 1682-0983
In: Journal of political science education, Band 17, Heft sup1, S. 185-203
ISSN: 1551-2177
In: Journal of peacebuilding & development, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 250-255
ISSN: 2165-7440
In: Journal of human rights, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 502-523
ISSN: 1475-4843
In: Small wars & insurgencies, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 68-90
ISSN: 1743-9558
In: International journal of politics, culture and society, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 251-273
ISSN: 1573-3416
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 138-141
ISSN: 1537-5935
ABSTRACTBased on a recent survey of political science professors in the United States, women tend to win teaching awards at higher rates than their male counterparts. This may seem like good news for female faculty, particularly amid continuing reports of gender gaps in publications and citations as well as the "leaky pipeline" phenomenon within promotions. However, a closer look at these findings suggests that in cases in which such awards might be most beneficial to women, they are less likely than their male colleagues to receive such acknowledgments. In fact, women are more likely than men to receive these awards only in institutional contexts in which research output is more important for tenure and promotion than teaching. Thus, the achievement of teaching excellence may have an overall negative impact on the advancement of female faculty by reducing their time and focus available for research.
In: Studies in security and international affairs
This study examines and compares the important work on global human rights advocacy done by religious NGOs and by secular NGOs. By studying the similarities in how such organizations understand their work, we can better consider not only how religious and secular NGOs might complement each other but also how they might collaborate and cooperate in the advancement of human rights. However, little research has attempted to compare these types of NGOs and their approaches. NGOs and Human Rights explores this comparison and identifies the key areas of overlap and divergence. In so doing, it lays the groundwork for better understanding how to capitalize on the strengths of religious groups, especially in addressing the world's many human rights challenges. This book uses a new dataset of more than three hundred organizations affiliated with the United Nations Human Rights Council to compare the extent to which religious and secular NGOs differ in their framing, discussion, and operationalization of human rights work. Using both quantitative analysis of the extensive data collected by the authors and forty-seven in depth interviews conducted with members of human rights organizations in the sample, Charity Butcher and Maia Carter Hallward analyze these organizations' approaches to questions of culture, development, women's rights, children's rights, and issues of peace and conflict.
World Affairs Online
In: European political science: EPS, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 99-112
ISSN: 1682-0983
In: International studies perspectives: a journal of the International Studies Association, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 81-109
ISSN: 1528-3577
World Affairs Online
In: International studies perspectives: ISP, S. ekw001
ISSN: 1528-3585
In: International studies perspectives: a journal of the International Studies Association
ISSN: 1528-3577