Review: Nation & State the State in Transition
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 161-162
ISSN: 2052-465X
40 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 161-162
ISSN: 2052-465X
In: Studies in political economy: SPE ; a socialist review, Heft 51, S. 183
ISSN: 0707-8552
In: Studies in political economy: SPE, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 183-217
ISSN: 1918-7033
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 389-390
ISSN: 1744-9324
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 103-127
ISSN: 2052-465X
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 103-127
ISSN: 0020-7020
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 389-390
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: International Journal, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 103
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 103
ISSN: 0020-7020
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 790-792
ISSN: 2052-465X
In: Third world thematics: a TWQ journal, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 285-291
ISSN: 2379-9978
In: Third world thematics: a TWQ journal, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 382-395
ISSN: 2379-9978
We evaluate access for people with disabilities in two Canadian federal government eConsultations — the development of its Innovation Strategy and as part of the Parliamentary sub-Committee on People with Disabilities consultations around the Canada Pension Plan — Disability hearings. From qualitative interviews with government and the disability community as well analysis of key documents, we illustrate what worked in ensuring access for Canadians with disabilities and what served to create additional barriers to access. We suggest, first, that accessibility is not the same thing as usability and requires meeting, at minimum, commonly held standards of access. Secondly, we argue that access is not enough to bring people with disabilities into eConsultations. Proactive measures to reach people experiencing a wide spectrum of disabilities are essential to "enfranchising" people with disabilities in eDemocracy. Addressing both access and inclusion are simply good public policy, not extraordinary measures to address a minority population.
BASE
In: International Journal, Band 51, Heft 3, S. 581