Suchergebnisse

Amartya Sen's works lead to focus theoretical issues relative to deliberative democracy, not only on optimal procedural rules, but upstream on the substantial content of the informational basis that serves as background to deliberation. The contribution explores the issues to take on board, especially questions on deliberative inquiries and the constitution of publics. ; La contribution porte sur l'intégration des problèmes liés à la base informationnelle dans les recherches sur la démocratie délibérative.

Amartya Sen's works lead to focus theoretical issues relative to deliberative democracy, not only on optimal procedural rules, but upstream on the substantial content of the informational basis that serves as background to deliberation. The contribution explores the issues to take on board, especially questions on deliberative inquiries and the constitution of publics. ; La contribution porte sur l'intégration des problèmes liés à la base informationnelle dans les recherches sur la démocratie délibérative.

Amartya Sen's works lead to focus theoretical issues relative to deliberative democracy, not only on optimal procedural rules, but upstream on the substantial content of the informational basis that serves as background to deliberation. The contribution explores the issues to take on board, especially questions on deliberative inquiries and the constitution of publics. ; La contribution porte sur l'intégration des problèmes liés à la base informationnelle dans les recherches sur la démocratie délibérative.

Amartya Sen's works lead to focus theoretical issues relative to deliberative democracy, not only on optimal procedural rules, but upstream on the substantial content of the informational basis that serves as background to deliberation. The contribution explores the issues to take on board, especially questions on deliberative inquiries and the constitution of publics. ; La contribution porte sur l'intégration des problèmes liés à la base informationnelle dans les recherches sur la démocratie délibérative.

Amartya Sen's works lead to focus theoretical issues relative to deliberative democracy, not only on optimal procedural rules, but upstream on the substantial content of the informational basis that serves as background to deliberation. The contribution explores the issues to take on board, especially questions on deliberative inquiries and the constitution of publics. ; La contribution porte sur l'intégration des problèmes liés à la base informationnelle dans les recherches sur la démocratie délibérative.

Version originale en français de l'article, publié ensuite en allemand: R. Salais, 2008, "Evaluation und Politik: Auf der Suche nach guten Indikatoren für die Forschung", Leviathan, numéro spécial "Wissenschaft under Beobachtung, Hildegard Matthies und Dagmar Simon (Hrsg.), p. 193-212 ; Evaluation through benchmarking processes is expanding quickly in firms as well as in national administrations, international organisations (or the construction of Europe). They cover a wide spectrum of domains, research as well economic, social or employment issues. Their basic tool is the use of indicators of performance (such as the global rate of employment to evaluate the performance of national employment policies). They draw their political legitimacy and acceptance from the fact that these are figures (hence a priori objective and non debatable). Issues are, in reality, much more complicated. Using indicators as a tool for governance is not only substituting technique for politics in the sake of political neutrality; it is at the same, even if often inadvertently, making politics through technical choice. By using some key European exemples, I put in contrast two conceptions for the building and use of indicators, an instrumental one (derived from New Public Management) and an ethical one (derived from the works of Amartya Sen). Then I try to apply these conceptions towards research evaluation and to sketch a pluralist approach to evaluation in terms of objectives, actors and methods. ; La conférence porte sur l'emploi des indicateurs de performance dans l'évaluation de l'action publique, en particulier la recherche. Elle contraste eux méthodes d'articulation entre évaluation et recherche et esquisse un cadre de saisie de la pluralité des acteurs et de leur modes d'évaluation.

Version originale en français de l'article, publié ensuite en allemand: R. Salais, 2008, "Evaluation und Politik: Auf der Suche nach guten Indikatoren für die Forschung", Leviathan, numéro spécial "Wissenschaft under Beobachtung, Hildegard Matthies und Dagmar Simon (Hrsg.), p. 193-212 ; Evaluation through benchmarking processes is expanding quickly in firms as well as in national administrations, international organisations (or the construction of Europe). They cover a wide spectrum of domains, research as well economic, social or employment issues. Their basic tool is the use of indicators of performance (such as the global rate of employment to evaluate the performance of national employment policies). They draw their political legitimacy and acceptance from the fact that these are figures (hence a priori objective and non debatable). Issues are, in reality, much more complicated. Using indicators as a tool for governance is not only substituting technique for politics in the sake of political neutrality; it is at the same, even if often inadvertently, making politics through technical choice. By using some key European exemples, I put in contrast two conceptions for the building and use of indicators, an instrumental one (derived from New Public Management) and an ethical one (derived from the works of Amartya Sen). Then I try to apply these conceptions towards research evaluation and to sketch a pluralist approach to evaluation in terms of objectives, actors and methods. ; La conférence porte sur l'emploi des indicateurs de performance dans l'évaluation de l'action publique, en particulier la recherche. Elle contraste eux méthodes d'articulation entre évaluation et recherche et esquisse un cadre de saisie de la pluralité des acteurs et de leur modes d'évaluation.

Version originale en français de l'article, publié ensuite en allemand: R. Salais, 2008, "Evaluation und Politik: Auf der Suche nach guten Indikatoren für die Forschung", Leviathan, numéro spécial "Wissenschaft under Beobachtung, Hildegard Matthies und Dagmar Simon (Hrsg.), p. 193-212 ; Evaluation through benchmarking processes is expanding quickly in firms as well as in national administrations, international organisations (or the construction of Europe). They cover a wide spectrum of domains, research as well economic, social or employment issues. Their basic tool is the use of indicators of performance (such as the global rate of employment to evaluate the performance of national employment policies). They draw their political legitimacy and acceptance from the fact that these are figures (hence a priori objective and non debatable). Issues are, in reality, much more complicated. Using indicators as a tool for governance is not only substituting technique for politics in the sake of political neutrality; it is at the same, even if often inadvertently, making politics through technical choice. By using some key European exemples, I put in contrast two conceptions for the building and use of indicators, an instrumental one (derived from New Public Management) and an ethical one (derived from the works of Amartya Sen). Then I try to apply these conceptions towards research evaluation and to sketch a pluralist approach to evaluation in terms of objectives, actors and methods. ; La conférence porte sur l'emploi des indicateurs de performance dans l'évaluation de l'action publique, en particulier la recherche. Elle contraste eux méthodes d'articulation entre évaluation et recherche et esquisse un cadre de saisie de la pluralité des acteurs et de leur modes d'évaluation.

Version originale en français de l'article, publié ensuite en allemand: R. Salais, 2008, "Evaluation und Politik: Auf der Suche nach guten Indikatoren für die Forschung", Leviathan, numéro spécial "Wissenschaft under Beobachtung, Hildegard Matthies und Dagmar Simon (Hrsg.), p. 193-212 ; Evaluation through benchmarking processes is expanding quickly in firms as well as in national administrations, international organisations (or the construction of Europe). They cover a wide spectrum of domains, research as well economic, social or employment issues. Their basic tool is the use of indicators of performance (such as the global rate of employment to evaluate the performance of national employment policies). They draw their political legitimacy and acceptance from the fact that these are figures (hence a priori objective and non debatable). Issues are, in reality, much more complicated. Using indicators as a tool for governance is not only substituting technique for politics in the sake of political neutrality; it is at the same, even if often inadvertently, making politics through technical choice. By using some key European exemples, I put in contrast two conceptions for the building and use of indicators, an instrumental one (derived from New Public Management) and an ethical one (derived from the works of Amartya Sen). Then I try to apply these conceptions towards research evaluation and to sketch a pluralist approach to evaluation in terms of objectives, actors and methods. ; La conférence porte sur l'emploi des indicateurs de performance dans l'évaluation de l'action publique, en particulier la recherche. Elle contraste eux méthodes d'articulation entre évaluation et recherche et esquisse un cadre de saisie de la pluralité des acteurs et de leur modes d'évaluation.

Version originale en français de l'article, publié ensuite en allemand: R. Salais, 2008, "Evaluation und Politik: Auf der Suche nach guten Indikatoren für die Forschung", Leviathan, numéro spécial "Wissenschaft under Beobachtung, Hildegard Matthies und Dagmar Simon (Hrsg.), p. 193-212 ; Evaluation through benchmarking processes is expanding quickly in firms as well as in national administrations, international organisations (or the construction of Europe). They cover a wide spectrum of domains, research as well economic, social or employment issues. Their basic tool is the use of indicators of performance (such as the global rate of employment to evaluate the performance of national employment policies). They draw their political legitimacy and acceptance from the fact that these are figures (hence a priori objective and non debatable). Issues are, in reality, much more complicated. Using indicators as a tool for governance is not only substituting technique for politics in the sake of political neutrality; it is at the same, even if often inadvertently, making politics through technical choice. By using some key European exemples, I put in contrast two conceptions for the building and use of indicators, an instrumental one (derived from New Public Management) and an ethical one (derived from the works of Amartya Sen). Then I try to apply these conceptions towards research evaluation and to sketch a pluralist approach to evaluation in terms of objectives, actors and methods. ; La conférence porte sur l'emploi des indicateurs de performance dans l'évaluation de l'action publique, en particulier la recherche. Elle contraste eux méthodes d'articulation entre évaluation et recherche et esquisse un cadre de saisie de la pluralité des acteurs et de leur modes d'évaluation.