Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
6022 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
World Affairs Online
In: The end of sovereignty?: a transatlantic perspective, S. 237-242
In: Plurinational Democracy, S. 134-159
In: International affairs, Band 72, Heft 4, S. 840-840
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: The political quarterly, Band 61, Heft 3, S. 299-317
ISSN: 1467-923X
In: Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect, S. 100-131
In: The political quarterly: PQ, Band 69, Heft 1, S. 85
ISSN: 0032-3179
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 315
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 473
ISSN: 1354-5078
In: Global political economy: GPE, S. 1-18
ISSN: 2635-2257
Digital Sovereignty is core to many contemporary debates on the regulation of digital technology, securing supply chains and strengthening the digital economy. In this paper, we focus on the European debates and policies around this project. We argue that the notion of digital sovereignty should be understood more as an overarching economic, societal and geopolitical project, rather than a project aimed at achieving any kind of political sovereignty or autarky in the digital sector. We arrive at this conclusion by analysing European policy documents and commentaries from various stakeholders for two cases: platform governance and semiconductors. The case of platform governance shows how the EU and its member states struggle to extend their regulatory power over the 'data monopolies' of the major Silicon Valley companies. The other is semiconductors, where the EU has kick-started several projects to improve the competitiveness of European manufacturers in a highly integrated global market. These examples demonstrate two things: a) that the pursuit of digital sovereignty does have some impact on the Internet (platform regulation) but also extends to other technological fields beyond it (semiconductors) and b) that digital sovereignty is not only a regulatory or technological project but also an economic, societal and geopolitical one.
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 112, Heft 3, S. 534
ISSN: 0032-3195
In: Asian journal of German and European studies, Band 3, Heft 1
ISSN: 2199-4579
AbstractThe World War II (WWII) as a great shock significantly weakened the European nation-state paradigm and gave the European elites a chance to achieve a 'paradigm shift' from 'the nation-state paradigm' to a 'federalist paradigm'. However, the nation-state's strong institutionalization did not allow a paradigm shift and the WWII actually created a 'paradigm duplication' in the European integration process. In this two-layered atmosphere, 'democracy' was conceptualized under the influence of 'federalist intellectual paradigm' but its implementation had to be achieved in the nation-state paradigm. Therefore, this anomaly has played a significant role in the recent stalemate the European integration process has faced. For example, the literature clearly shows the relationship between the sensitivity of European nations towards their national sovereignty and the rise of Euroscepticism in the European integration process. Moreover, the institutional and legitimate strength of the nation-state gives the nation-state paradigm a gravitational power, which gradually weakens the feasibility of the ideas originating from the federalist paradigm. As a result, this article argues that a more symbiotic institutionalization of democracy and sovereignty is necessary to make the European integration more attractive again.
In: Ius Gentium : comparative perspectives on law and justice volume 51
In: EUI working papers / Law Department, 2006/45
World Affairs Online
In: Political studies, Band 47, Heft 3, S. 503-521
ISSN: 0032-3217