Suchergebnisse

"May 11, 1979." ; At head of title: 96th Congress, 1st session, Committee print, no. 6. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Stamped on cover: Aug. 15, 1975. ; "B-163582." ; "ID-76-9." ; Cover title. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Photocopy.

At head of cover title: National Military Establishment, 1948- ; Report year ends June 30. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Recent years have seen a mounting concern in the United States over foreign efforts to harm election security or legitimacy through cyber means, increased cyber espionage, and attacks of growing sophistication. The United States has been engaged for almost a decade in international negotiations over agreed normative constraints on such activities, but the prospects for a comprehensive international agreement appear dim. In this report, the authors develop a renewed agenda for utilizing cyber norms to limit destabilizing behavior in cyberspace. To do so, they survey the literature on norms and norm emergence and describe the process by which norms tend to arise. They identify the common and conflicting interests that major states have in cyberspace, summarize the history of intergovernmental and private-sector initiatives on cyber norms, outline the principles governing U.S. policy on the issue since 2007, and survey current proposals for cyber norms. Based on this analysis, the authors propose a bottom-up, "outside-in" approach to promoting cyber norms that would allow the United States to bypass current international disagreements to encourage the development of norms to constrain the most destructive and escalatory forms of cyber aggression

A New Form of Conflict -- The Evolving Infosphere -- Insights from Social Science -- Emerging Technologies -- Future 1: The Death of Reality (2025 Scenario) -- Future 2: Silos of Belief (2024 Scenario) -- Future 3: The Rise of the Algorithms (2026 Scenario) -- The Emerging Risk of Virtual Societal Warfare.

"Supercedes United States Army, 1956 cumulative pocket part, 31 December 1956." ; Caption title. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Includes index. ; Shipping list no.: 97-0060-S. ; "Includes the consolidation of all Federal acquisition circulars through 90-46"--Cover. ; v. 1. Parts 1 to 51 -- v. 2. Parts 52, 53, appendix & index. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Bound with the author's Report of the military health care study, December 1975. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; PUBL; UH223.A3251 1976: Bound with main report

"This report, prepared in the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (Research and Advanced Technology/Research and Laboratory Management), is an update of a previous volume . "--P.iii. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Supplement to U.S. Armed Forces medical journal. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Published by the Armed Forces Medical Publication Agency, Dept. of Defense.

"In 2015, for the first time, millennials outnumbered baby boomers as the largest generational segment of the U.S. population. This report describes how the intelligence community (IC) must engage millennials across multiple segments to succeed in the future: millennials as intelligence clients, employees, and partners and as members of the public. The authors explore how the perspectives and experiences of millennials falling into each segment are relevant to IC functions and missions. Millennials in each segment may perceive intelligence differently from previous generations, which may influence whether and how they partner and engage with the IC; such decisions will affect future intelligence missions. This report provides an understanding of areas in which intelligence agencies may benefit from further study"--Back cover

This report identifies key lessons from the first National Defense Panel (NDP) and makes recommendations to the Congress, the administration, and future NDP management teams about how the process can be made more effective. The NDP was established by the 1996 Military Force Structure Review Act as an independent effort to provide guidance to the Secretary of Defense and the Congress on long-term defense strategies and force structure requirements. This report reviews the motivations for creating the NDP, its administrative and logistical experience, the NDP's relationship to the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), and the final NDP report. Some of the principal recommendations are that (1) the NDP should maintain its focus on defense issues, but do more to integrate its recommendations into the broader national security agenda; (2) future NDPs should be better coordinated with the defense planning cycle (i.e., the next NDP, preceding the next QDR, should complete its work before the new administration comes into office in 2001); and (3) future NDPs should deal more systematically with resource constraints than the first NDP

The process of modernizing U.S. military forces is the focus of this report. This process requires reinvigorating concept development efforts, thinking broadly about alternatives, and pursuing concept development before decisions are made about which services, which platforms, or which technologies are best suited for accomplishing current or new military tasks. In February and March 1996, RAND convened a concept options group (COG), which included broadly knowledgeable technologists drawn from a variety of scientific and engineering backgrounds, experienced military operators, and senior analysts and planners. By focusing on two specific military tasks, the COG considered options for using technologies that could enable U.S. forces to perform an existing military mission better, perform it differently, or gain a new capability. This report presents highlights from the COG discussions as well as some suggestions for convening future COGs

"B-276428"--P. 1. ; "GAO/NSIAD/OSI-99-133." ; "August 1999." ; Cover title. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.

G.P.O. sales statement incorrect in publication ; "B-196565"--Prelim. p ; "LCD-80-96." ; Sept. 12, 1980 ; Cover title ; Mode of access: Internet.