Suchergebnisse

Zusammenfassung
In der Regel ist die Trennung eines Paares auch mit der Aufteilung gemeinsamer Anschaffungen verbunden. Dabei spielen die gemeinsamen Haustiere, zu denen meist beide Partner im Laufe der Zeit eine emotionale Bindung entwickelt haben, eine besondere Rolle. Der folgende Beitrag nimmt eine aktuelle Entscheidung des AG Marburg v. 3.11.2023 - 74 F 809/23 WH, MDR 2024, 507 zum Anlass, die rechtlichen Hintergründe und verschiedenen Aspekte, die für die Entscheidung über die vorläufige gerichtliche Zuweisung eines Haustieres, in casu eines Hundes, ausschlaggebend sind, näher zu beleuchten und auf die Möglichkeit der vorsorglichen Regelung des Umgangs mit dem Tier in einer bereits im Vorfeld der Eheschließung getroffenen Vereinbarung einzugehen.

In only the last few years, "neurotechnology" has notched a place on the international agenda and prompted substantial expert debate around whether and why we need "neurorights." With civil society actors and public voices largely absent from these international debates, Australia is uniquely positioned to facilitate and argue for greater inclusion in global neurorights conversations.

AbstractRegulatory sandboxes have become the latest development in regulatory reform, starting first in financial regulation and now expanding to other sectors. While sandboxes offer notable potential benefits for managing emerging technologies, achieving desirable policy outcomes with this novel regulatory instrument also comes with technical and political challenges. This article offers a framework to characterize regulatory sandboxes in any sector, involving a blend of (1) approval regulation with broad‐based standards, (2) restricted discretion by the regulator for specific norms, (3) process‐oriented regulation, (4) an outcomes‐orientation, and (5) structured regulator–regulatee information sharing or dialogue. Using this model, the article outlines issues in compliance and legitimacy, including in trust and accountability, responsive enforcement, the politics of participation, and post‐sandbox oversight. The article concludes by calling for greater scrutiny when considering implementing a sandbox instrument, with attention to sector‐specific concerns, and offering directions for empirical evaluation of regulatory sandboxes.

In this article, I argue that the psychological basis of many of the problems associated with immigration can be traced to tangible threats, cultural threats, fears of change, and the negative attitudes and misperceptions that flow from these threats and fears. Concrete suggestions are made for policies at the societal and individual levels that can counteract these problems. In addition, specific programs are suggested to improve relations between residents and immigrants. The article ends with a discussion of some of the psychological processes that underlie improvements in intergroup relations. Adapted from the source document.