Suchergebnisse

W racjonalizowaniu systemu zabezpieczenia społecznego, który ma zapewniać okre‑ślony standard bezpieczeństwa socjalnego, istotne znaczenie powinna mieć możliwośćzastosowania w nim rozwiązań finansowych o charakterze publicznych funduszy celo‑wych, związanych z danym ryzykiem społecznym. Takie podejście do realizacji jednejz socjalnych funkcji państwa umożliwiałoby dokładniejsze przyjrzenie się ważnemupodsystemowi transferów dochodów, który ma istotne znaczenie w realnym kształtowaniustosunków społecznych wynikających ze skali redystrybucji dochodów. Praktyka poli‑tyki społecznej oraz organizacji i funkcjonowania systemu zabezpieczenia społecznegopokazuje jednak, że jesteśmy dalecy od przestrzegania zasady paraubezpieczeniowejw tworzeniu publicznych funduszy celowych. W takiej sytuacji nie można liczyć na więk‑szą akceptację społeczną dla ukierunkowanych obciążeń fiskalnych oraz na osłabieniewpływu czynnika politycznego na gromadzenie i wydatkowanie środków publicznychzwiązanych z socjalną funkcją państwa. Nie powinno to jednak oznaczać przekreśleniamożliwości posługiwania się odpowiednio skonstruowanymi publicznymi funduszamisocjalnymi w racjonalizowaniu

Sfera wartości i związane z nimi uwarunkowania polityki to zagadnienia aktualne w naukach społecznych. Autor prezentuje dobre praktyki w zakresie partnerstwa pomiędzy aktorami w procesie kreowania, realizacji i ewaluacji polityki publicznej, podkreślając ich fundamenty aksjologiczne. Ma to zwłaszcza zastosowanie wobec sektora wiedzy jako obszaru szczególnie wrażliwego na gruncie instytucjonalnym ze względu na duże aspiracje zaangażowanych twórców.
Artykuł przedstawia pojęcie sektora wiedzy na tle określeń powiązanych, takich jak: społeczeństwo wiedzy, społeczeństwo informacyjne, gospodarka oparta na wiedzy, zarządzanie wiedzą, a także formułuje pewne zalecenia dotyczące rozwoju tego sektora.
Autor prezentuje strukturę podmiotową sektora wiedzy w ujęciu funkcjonalnym, z podkreśleniem postulatu większej integracji instytucjonalnej w działaniach prorozwojowych.
W artykule prezentowane są normy konstytucyjne, a na ich tle postulowane zasady dialogu społecznego i partnerstwa jako zasady fundamentalne w sektorze wiedzy. Autor analizuje misję państwa, podkreślając znaczenie jego roli jako gwaranta tych reguł.
Artykuł przedstawia instrumentarium polityki publicznej wobec sektora wiedzy, z podkreśleniem znaczenia zasad i dobrych praktyk we współdziałaniu realizatorów polityki publicznej z kreatorami wiedzy jako ich partnerami środowiskowymi.

Kraje europejskie po kilkunastoletnim okresie destabilizacji gospodarczej irozchwianiastruktur społecznych w połowie drugiej dekady XXI wieku wkroczą w co najmniej kilku‑nastoletni okres przeobrażeń społecznych, ustrojowych i strukturalno‑organizacyjnychstymulowanych coraz głębiej motywowanymi, uświadomionymi i jednoznacznie arty‑kułowanymi oczekiwaniami bezpieczeństwa socjalnego i zdrowotnego szerokich rzeszspołecznych. W tej nowej, bliskiej już, epoce transformacji realizacja nadrzędnych celówsłużyć powinna jedności UE i wspólnemu bezpieczeństwu wewnętrznemu i zewnętrz‑nemu. Polityka spójności, jako narzędzie realizacji tych celów, uwzględniać musi te noweuwarunkowania i wymaga wsparcia przez szczegółowe komplementarne programy/projekty regionalne. Wynika stąd konieczność reinterpretacji pojęcia regionalizacja, czyteż wskazania nowych wymiarów regionalizacji, w odniesieniu do polityki spójności.

Przedmiotem opracowania jest ewolucja brytyjskiej polityki publicznej w latach1900–2010. Analiza koncentruje się na polityce budżetowej, walutowej i socjalnej orazpolityce wobec sektora publicznego. Zaprezentowany w tekście materiał faktograficznypozwala na uchwycenie kilku prawidłowości. W omawianym czasie rosła gospodarczai społeczna aktywność państwa, ale nie był to proces o przebiegu liniowym. Można za‑obserwować kilka momentów przełomowych, które związane były z trzema kategoriamizjawisk: wojnami, kryzysami ekonomicznymi i zmianami na najwyższych szczeblachwładzy. W konsekwencji, historia brytyjskiej polityki publicznej w latach 1900–2010dzieli się na następujące etapy: 1) 1900–1931 – schyłek epoki liberalnej; 2) 1931–1951 –stały wzrost aktywności gospodarczej państwa; 3) 1951–1979 – stabilizacja ustrojowana wysokim poziomie zaangażowania państwa w kwestie gospodarcze i społeczne;4) 1997–2007 – próba powrotu do liberalizmu gospodarczego; 5) 2007–2010 – okreswahań i poszukiwania nowych zasad polityki publicznej.

The following debate took place on September 24, 2019 at the Warsaw School of Economics. Its subject was the issues of upbringing / moral education in schools. On the other hand, the aim was to outline a diagnosis of the situation in this respect, i.e. how schools cope with the implementation of educational functions and moral formation of students. At the beginning, the educational functions of schools were distinguished from the didactic functions (transmission of knowledge from teachers to students), leaving the latter to be discussed on another occasion. The issue of ways of creating a better balance in schools between the two functions they perform: education and transfer of knowledge (didactics) was also discussed.

The subject of the debate was the main elements of the reform in the way higher education functions, implemented from October 2019. The background of the reform was discussed, including the historical and mental conditions of the academic community, and then the reform programming phase (e.g. consultation procedures), the phase of implementing changes (including the issue of adjusting the publication of regulations) and the sphere of new or additional incentives were discussed. which introduced new regulations into academic life (e.g. new rules for obtaining points by scholars for publications, new evaluation rules to which universities are subject, rules for creating statutes).

The following debate took place on March 22, 2019 at the Warsaw School of Economics. The content of the Study on Spatial Chaos report provided the framework for the discussion. Its authors estimated the cost of spatial chaos at PLN 84.3 billion per year. They indicated the main mechanisms leading to the occurrence of this phenomenon.

The following discussion took place in September 2018 at the Warsaw School of Economics. It focused on both senior politics, experts, and analysts. The discussion was moderated and planned by Andrzej Klimczuk, associated with the Warsaw School of Economics, and invited to the discussion: Barbara Szatur-Jaworska, social politician and gerontologist from the University of Warsaw, Paweł Kubicki, economist, Warsaw School of Economics, Marek Niezabitowski, sociologist from the Silesian University of Technology, Ryszard Majer, social politician , Agnieszka Cieśla, architect and urban planner, Warsaw University of Technology, Marzena Rudnicka, founder and president of the National Institute of Senior Management (biographical notes at the end of the debate). Panelists during the discussion analyzed the following issues: I. Beginnings of the senior policy, its definition, strategic documents of the state, II. The role of local governments in animating activities within the framework of senior policy and non-governmental organizations, III. Creation and role of the law on seniors, IV. Diversification of the environment of seniors, V. Activities in other countries within the framework of the senior policy, VI. Changes in social awareness, the evolution of attitudes towards older people, old age, ageing, VII. The market for products and services for seniors, VIII. Seniors' activity, formal and informal, activity infrastructure, IX. Housing for older people and ageing population X. The role of the state and self-government in the senior policy, dialogue with the authorities, public-private partnership, XI. Challenges and directions of development of the senior policy, XII. The deficit of care services, XIII. Senior and pension policy, XIV. Convergence and divergence in the senior policy.

The following discussion took place in September 2018 at the Warsaw School of Economics. It focused on both senior politics, experts, and analysts. The discussion was moderated and planned by Andrzej Klimczuk, associated with the Warsaw School of Economics, and invited to the discussion: Barbara Szatur-Jaworska, social politician and gerontologist from the University of Warsaw, Paweł Kubicki, economist, Warsaw School of Economics, Marek Niezabitowski, sociologist from the Silesian University of Technology, Ryszard Majer, social politician , Agnieszka Cieśla, architect and urban planner, Warsaw University of Technology, Marzena Rudnicka, founder and president of the National Institute of Senior Management (biographical notes at the end of the debate). Panelists during the discussion analyzed the following issues: I. Beginnings of the senior policy, its definition, strategic documents of the state, II. The role of local governments in animating activities within the framework of senior policy and non-governmental organizations, III. Creation and role of the law on seniors, IV. Diversification of the environment of seniors, V. Activities in other countries within the framework of the senior policy, VI. Changes in social awareness, the evolution of attitudes towards older people, old age, ageing, VII. The market for products and services for seniors, VIII. Seniors' activity, formal and informal, activity infrastructure, IX. Housing for older people and ageing population X. The role of the state and self-government in the senior policy, dialogue with the authorities, public-private partnership, XI. Challenges and directions of development of the senior policy, XII. The deficit of care services, XIII. Senior and pension policy, XIV. Convergence and divergence in the senior policy.

This paper aims to present different approaches to the analysis of public policies on ageing. The study contains short descriptions of selected theories on formulating and implementing responses to challenges related to the issues and problems relevant to older people and ageing people. The paper discusses selected concepts such as politicization of ageing, public policy on ageing and the politics of ageing. In the further part of the work, an attempt was made to discuss the framework of the stages of the public policy design cycle and codesign as well as selected public policy theories associated with the population ageing that were divided into deductive and inductive approaches and broken down into levels of social system analysis (micro, meso and macro). The summary presents proposals for further research directions.

During the discussion, the panellists analyzed several main issues: I. The role of the family and public institutions in long-term care. II. System solutions in the policy of supporting carers of dependent people. III. The method of financing care for elderly dependent people (including the role of social insurance). IV. The ability to provide care to dependent people and public expenditure on it, forms of support for carers. V. The role of the market in providing care and state activities. Outsourcing of carers of dependent people. Relationship between bottom-up actions and top-down actions taken by central authorities. VI. Reconciling the role of a caregiver with work on the free market.

The book addresses issues related to labor market policy, shows the relevant mechanisms of its research, programming and implementation, and its subject is, in particular, the analysis of the situation of employees of employment offices and the unemployed themselves. The book is multidimensional. For me, the first part, in which the author presents his view on trends in the policy of the labor market that are decreasing in the environment of our science, presents to me a special focus. Recognizes the disproportionate emphasis on the analysis of legal acts, on "official documents, on target-set objectives, often unrealistic." He points to the dean of the research perspective in which the official who is the "face of the state" is present, which determines the quality of public service , de "perspectives of the final recipient", i.e. a citizen (quality of services for a citizen).

The aim of our discussion is to look at the socio-economic analysis. It should be assumed that this is the basic resource of various types of knowledge (policy knowledge), which - in principle - is to provide the basis for making public decisions. As a result, these decisions are to be optimal or better than those decisions that are based only on intuition, belief, etc. This is, therefore, an analysis that is to be a resource of rationalized, verifiable knowledge from reliable sources.

There are also theoretical issues such as: adequacy of this discipline of knowledge to the analysis of the realities of public action in Poland. This issue arises due to the fact that public policy emerged as a discipline of knowledge in the Anglo-Saxon tradition, on the basis of its specificity. Moreover, the theories evident in public policy science have been developed in the West, mainly in America. The local realities were the basis. Therefore, the question arises whether we should build our theories or adapt those that have been developed elsewhere. Meanwhile, we do not have many or even most elements of the Anglo-Saxon tradition, even in terms of the size of our analytical achievements. We are not even inclined to conduct such an advanced analysis of social and economic phenomena. Hence, it seems important to me to ask about the theoretical potential of this discipline in relation to the analysis of public activities in Poland.

The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed overview of the essential measures and regulations implemented by the European Union within the framework of its public policy on cybersecurity and make a comprehensive comparative analysis of the cybersecurity capabilities in E. U. Member States and their national strategies in this area. This article highlights multiple issues that should be the center of attention in regard to public policy on cybersecurity, which made it possible to evaluate the compliance of the existing 104 Zbigniew Chmielewski Studia z Polityki Publicznej regulations passed by the E. U. policy makers and the way it was approached. Based on the 2015 Software Alliance (BSA) survey and other available sources an analysis was made to evaluate the readiness of E. U. Member States to ensure security in cyberspace. Special attention was paid to "The Assumptions of Cybersecurity Strategy of the Republic of Poland", developed by the Ministry of Digitisation and published in February 2016.