Western European Union v. Siedler; General Secretariat of the ACP Group v. Lutchmaya; General Secretariat of the ACP Group v. B.D
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 105, Heft 3, S. 560-567
ISSN: 2161-7953
303 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 105, Heft 3, S. 560-567
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Geopolitics, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 635-655
ISSN: 1557-3028
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of European integration, Band 42, Heft 6, S. 783-798
ISSN: 0703-6337
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 42, Heft 6, S. 783-798
ISSN: 1477-2280
In: Third world thematics: a TWQ journal, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 508-525
ISSN: 2379-9978
In: Failler , P 2015 , ' The ACP Group of States and the challenge of exporting fish to the European Union ' Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production , vol 3 , no. 3 , 142 . DOI:10.4172/2332-2608.1000142
Access to the European union (EU) for fish products originated from the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States is fundamental as fish is globally one of the most important commodities exported by these States. The recent implementation of economic partnership agreements will not change the magnitude of the challenges that these countries have to face to comply with EU rules such as the new Rules of Origin or the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures that are becoming more and more stringent. Value addition of fishery and aquaculture products seems to be the most promising way to both comply with EU standards and get an optimal return of sea and freshwater resources exploitation.
BASE
World Affairs Online
Die Beziehungen zwischen der Europäischen Union und 79 Ländern Afrikas, der Karibik und des Pazifik – vereint als AKP-Gruppe auftretend – gründet im Cotonou Abkommen. Dieses rechtlich bindende Vertragswerk ist einzigartig auf der Welt, indem es Länder aus vier Kontinenten zusammenführt. Das Cotonou Abkommen definiert die EU-AKP-Beziehungen in den Bereichen der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, des Handels und des politischen Dialogs. Das Cotonou Abkommen läuft im Jahr 2020 aus. ZEI Direktor Prof. Dr. Ludger Kühnhardt analysiert die bisherigen Effekte der EU-AKP-Beziehungen und entwickelt weitgehende Vorschläge für deren zukünftige Entwicklung: Er entwickelt den Vorschlag einer strategischen Reifung hin zu einem "EU-AKP Assoziationsvertrag für Entwicklung". Er diskutiert thematische Prioritäten, regionale Besonderheiten und projiziert eine stärkere globale Sichtbarkeit der EU-AKP Gruppe über 2020 hinaus.
BASE
In: Arbeitspapiere zur EU-Entwicklungspolitik, 6(E)
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of international development: the journal of the Development Studies Association, Band 25, Heft 5, S. 714-726
ISSN: 1099-1328
AbstractThe African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States and the European Union (EU) have engaged in what is known as a 'special privileged', legally binding contractual agreement on trade cooperation, development assistance and political dialogue since 1975. Currently expressed in the Cotonou Partnership Agreement for a 20‐year period from 2000, the agreement faces its final 5‐year review in 2015, which is proving conducive for an extensive debate between development practitioners on what future can be envisaged for ACP–EU relations in a world drastically different from the neocolonial era of the 1970s and offering new opportunities as well as challenges to trade, commerce and development assistance. From the perspective of a diplomatic representative of an ACP member state, a critique is offered of issues and instances in which the contested interests of the asymmetrical relationship can be interpreted in relation to the overarching objective of 'reducing and eventually eradicating poverty' as stated in the Cotonou Partnership Agreement. The author argues that the ACP Group, as the unique, transcontinental coalition of developing countries can be a significant partner with the EU and 'new actors', through south‐south and triangular cooperations to challenge traditional thinking and practice on development assistance by a thoroughly refashioned paradigm, in which equality, sustainability, inclusive growth and structural transformation of ACP economies must be pre‐eminent. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In: Journal of international development: the journal of the Development Studies Association, Band 14, Heft 6, S. 899-910
ISSN: 1099-1328
AbstractThis article reviews and assesses the recent Cotonou Partnership Agreement between the ACP group of developing countries and the EU. It places the Agreement in the context of the EU's commitment to refocusing its development policy and reforming its aid administration. It emphasises the innovative elements of the Agreement that set it apart from its Lome predecessors—the intention to move to reciprocal regional free trade agreements; the emphasis upon good governance; the rule of law and human rights; the enhanced role for non‐State actors and the private sector and the adoption of a rolling programme of aid provision. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In: Journal of international development: the journal of the Development Studies Association, Band 25, Heft 5, S. 742-756
ISSN: 1099-1328
AbstractThis Policy Arena has two main objectives. First, it seeks to unravel how the partnership between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group has evolved since the adoption of the Cotonou Agreement in 2000, including its 2005 and 2010 reviews and the implementation of its three key pillars (development cooperation, trade and political dialogue). Second, it explores the prospects of EU‐ACP relations in the medium to long term. In particular, it discusses whether the ACP‐EU cooperation framework is still relevant in the light of a number of global changes and, more specifically, whether the ACP configuration is still useful to its members. To address these issues, both the EU and the ACP Group have established two working groups. Within the ACP, voices are critical of the EU‐ACP partnership, but there appears to be more willingness to reform and renew it. Within the EU, the record of the Cotonou Agreement is seen more positively, but there seems to be less willingness to preserve it. The third review of the Cotonou Agreement to be finalised by 2015, and more generally its expiration in 2020, provides an opportunity – to which this Policy Arena seeks to contribute – to rethink the EU‐ACP cooperation model. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
World Affairs Online