Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
21196 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Issues in accounting education, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 85-94
ISSN: 1558-7983
ABSTRACTI start from the apparent observation that academics have inherently multifaceted jobs requiring their attention across a range of (typically three) activities (research, teaching, service)—that is, professors multitask. What seems less apparent, I then argue, is that effective organizational designs where multitasking is prevalent require weak incentives. To elaborate, my first point is that if department chairs/deans want their professors to undertake all three activities, and the three activities compete for their professors' attention, then multitasking theory posits, perhaps counterintuitively, that department chairs/deans should resist providing strong incentives to any one of the three activities. My own experiences and observations as a faculty member spanning 20 years, however, suggest that this theory is not always heeded, if not explicitly then certainly implicitly, causing distortions in faculty's allocation of effort and attention to all three activities. However, this point overlooks that synergies can exist across the three activities that make an earnest engagement with all three rather naturally attractive and mutually beneficial. I provide examples of such synergies as I see or have experienced them. Hence, my second point is that, subject to spillover effects across research, teaching, and service, focusing sensibly on one's portfolio of activities, and thoughtfully navigating their alleged tensions, one may well do better on all three as compared to when one uncritically accepts that these activities are in conflict or work against each other. Overall, then, the takeaway is that weak but balanced incentives may be especially conducive for engaged professors to have their greatest potential impact as a teacher, a researcher, and a citizen of academe. So, I was pleased when the guest editor asked me to write this article, hoping to make a compelling case for this because multitasking, when handled judiciously, makes for a richer, not poorer, profession and a richer experience for those who profess it—the professors.
In: Index on censorship, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 18-19
ISSN: 1746-6067
In: Diplomatic history, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 151-154
ISSN: 1467-7709
In: Russian social science review: a journal of translations, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 60-84
ISSN: 1557-7848
In: Russian politics and law, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 24-48
ISSN: 1558-0962
In: Russian politics and law: a journal of translations, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 24-48
ISSN: 1061-1940
In: Issues in Accounting Education, Band 33, Heft 3
SSRN
In: Labour research, Band 86, Heft 9
ISSN: 0023-7000
In: Social work: a journal of the National Association of Social Workers
ISSN: 1545-6846
In: Cultural politics: an international journal ; exploring cultural and political power across the globe, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 123-128
ISSN: 1751-7435
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 108-122
ISSN: 1743-8772
In: Radical society: review of culture and politics, Band 30, Heft 3-4, S. 85-93
ISSN: 1476-086X