Suchergebnisse
Filter
Монголын эртний нүүдэлчдийн зэр зэвсэг: (НТӨ II мянган жил - НТӨ III зуун)
In: "New researches on Mongolian archaeology" series 2
In: "Mongolyn arheologijn šinė sudalgaa" cuvral 2
In: "Монголын археологийн шинэ судалгаа" цуврал 2
Research on weapons of Mongolia's ancient nomads, 2000-200 B.C
Čingis Haany cėrgijn zėr zėvsėg: (nėmž zasvarlasan hoe͏̈r dahʹ hėvlėl)
Weapons used by soldiers in the army of Genghis Khan, 1162-1227, Mongol ruler
Aǰu aqui
In: Mongγol soyol sudulul-un čubural bičig = Meng gu wen hua yan jiu cong shu
In: Mongγol soyol sudulul-un čubural bičig = 蒙古文化研究丛书
On the economy of Inner Mongolia
Бичсэн зүйлийн минь утга санаа монгол улсын санхүүд дараа болохгүй
Articles on the socialist period of Mongolian economy written by an economist-journalist who was editor-in-chief of key economic journal
World Affairs Online
Evolution of common resource tenure and governing: evidence from pastureland in Mongolia Plateau
Includes bibliographical references. ; Presented at the Building resilience of Mongolian rangelands: a trans-disciplinary research conference held on June 9-10, 2015 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. ; Land tenure is to define who hold the land as well as the relationship between tenant and the lord. Most fundamentally tenure and changing tenure is capturing the value of the resource. The nature of the resource and changing relative scarcity are essential to induce or lead evolution of land tenure. Pasture resources have been held in open access and communal tenure for much of the long history on Mongolia Plateau because of the abundant resource with low population density. Historically pasture tenure in this region has been evolving from open and semi-open access to communal tenure (control) to more private ownership, although other forces like political system can only cause temporary departure from the general patterns. Presently the variety of tenure arrangements largely reflects the scarcity of the pastoral resources: Mongolia is still primarily adopting semi-open access with community governing although state is viewed as sole ownership, while Inner Mongolia is more directing privatization of at least the use rights.
BASE
How does local mining impact on rural immigration: case of Mongolia
Includes bibliographical references. ; Presented at the Building resilience of Mongolian rangelands: a trans-disciplinary research conference held on June 9-10, 2015 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. ; After 70 years of communist regime, Mongolia chose a radical transition for democracy and a market economy in 1990. Since the 2000s, the Mongolian government has been promoting the mining industry to increase its foreign exchanges. The mining sector may offer local job opportunities and revenues, but might also cause loss and degradation of pasture land the local people depend on. An empirical study is conducted to investigate whether the immigration of rural people from a mining area is different from that of a non-mining area using a probit model based on a 2013 workforce survey of Mongolia. The result shows that mining soums receive fewer outsiders than the non-mining soums, suggesting local mining activities exert limited economic linkage in local community for a case of Mongolia.
BASE
Mongol ulsyn ėdijn zasgijn gadaad harilcaany tobč tüüh, 1921 - 2000
History of international economic relations of Mongolia; covers 1921-2000