Being Funny and Being Right, Being Left and Being Right
In: A Conservative Walks Into a Bar, S. 165-207
239990 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: A Conservative Walks Into a Bar, S. 165-207
In: Rethinking Colonial Pasts through Archaeology, S. 371-396
In: Journal of gay & lesbian issues in education: an international quarterly devoted to research, policy, and practice, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 73-77
ISSN: 1541-0870
In: Oxford scholarship online
Juan Comesaã presents a new framework for understanding the rationality of action and belief, which he calls "Experientalism". Arguing that rational action requires rational belief but tolerates false belief, Comesaã provides a novel account of empirical evidence as consisting of the content of undefeated experiences.
In: Social work with groups: a journal of community and clinical practice, Band 40, Heft 1-2, S. 161-167
ISSN: 1540-9481
In: Review of radical political economics, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 100-106
ISSN: 1552-8502
In: Scottish affairs, Band 45 (First Serie, Heft 1, S. 161-163
ISSN: 2053-888X
In: Politics, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 3-8
ISSN: 1467-9256
In: Politics, Band 10, Heft Oct 90
ISSN: 0263-3957
G.A. Cohen argues that one is free to do what one is forced to, in order to explain the character of ideological disagreement over the idea that the proletariat are forced/free to sell their labour power. Argues that the stance is made clearer by analysing what the absence of a reasonable alternative entails. Concludes that all proletarians have 'type' freedom, but not all have 'token' freedom. (SJK)
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 64, Heft 382, S. 261-263
ISSN: 1944-785X
In: Honest Patriots, S. 263-286
SSRN
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 285-307
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Reid , J & Chandler , D 2018 , ' "Being in Being" : Contesting the Ontopolitics of Indigeneity ' , The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms , vol. 23 , no. 3 , pp. 251-268 . https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2017.1420284
This article critiques the shift towards valorizing indigeneity in western thought and contemporary practice. This shift in approach to indigenous ways of knowing and being, historically derided under conditions of colonialism, is a reflection of the "ontological turn" in anthropology. Rather than seeing indigenous peoples as having an inferior or different understanding of the world to a modernist one, the ontological turn suggests that their importance lies in the fact that they constitute different worlds and "world" in a performatively different way. The radical promise this view holds is that a different world already exists in potentia, the access to which is a question of ontology—of being differently: 'being in being' rather than thinking, acting and world-making as if we were transcendent or "possessive" modern subjects. We argue that the ontopolitical arguments for the superiority of indigenous ways of being should not be seen as radical or emancipatory resistances to modernist or colonial epistemological and ontological legacies but rather as a new form of neoliberal governmentality, cynically manipulating critical, postcolonial and ecological sensibilities for its own ends. Thus, rather than "provincializing" dominant western hegemonic practices, such discourses of indigeneity extend them, instituting new forms of governing through calls for adaptation and resilience.
BASE