Suchergebnisse

In today's cultural space earthlings artificial intelligence is regarded as one of the most advanced scientific disciplines and humanities as a key technology transformation of human nature. The concept of «artificial intelligence» integrated problems at the intersection of philosophy, mathematics, physics and other sciences, as well as the humanities. The article analyzes the problem of artificial intelligence with philosophical and anthropological items. The concept of natural human intelligence and artificial intelligence and show the differences between these concepts. These are typical examples that demonstrate the widespread use of high-tech devices with artificial intelligence to improve intellectual activity. The evaluation of the benefits and threats of the use of artificial intellectuality.The result of research on «artificial intelligence» is the desire to understand the human brain, to reveal the secrets of the human mind and the problem of creating machines that have a certain level of human intelligence. Currently, different models are constructed of artificial intelligence in almost all fields of study, but has not yet set your computer to be able to process information in any new area. Also rapidly growing practice of implementation of mega-projects on the study of the human brain as .Human Connectome, BRAIN Initiative - the goal is drawing up detailed maps of the human brain; Human Brain Project - simulation of the human brain, the human brain to boot the computer and many others. Despite the fact that the strategy of full implementation of planned projects is far to the finals, they already play an important role in solving social problems in medicine, industry, agriculture, education and training in military affairs and so on.The problem of artificial intelligence remains unsolved. Major discoveries in the field of artificial intelligence we expect after the decoding process of the brain and drawing up detailed maps of the human brain. The result will be a full-scale macroevolution, which involves reformatting «natural person» and replace it with «man-made man.» ; Осуществлен анализ проблемы создания искусственного интеллекта с философско-антропологических позиций. Определено понятие естественного человеческого интеллекта и искусственного интеллекта и показано различия между этими понятиями.Приведены типичные примеры, демонстрирующие широкое использование высокотехнологичных устройств с системами искусственной интеллектуальности для повышения эффективности интеллектуальной деятельности человека. Дана оценка преимуществ и угроз применения систем со искусственной интеллектуальностью. ; Здійснено аналіз проблеми створення штучного інтелекту з філософськоантропологічних позицій. Визначено поняття природного людського інтелекту і штучного інтелекту та показано відмінності між цими поняттями. Наведені типові приклади, що демонструють широке використання високотехнологічних пристроїв із системами штучної інтелектуальності для підвищення ефективності інтелектуальної діяльності людини. Дана оцінка переваг і загроз застосування систем із штучною інтелектуальністю.

The number of wholesale markets in Ukraine for 10 thousand inhabitants is ten times less than in Western Europe. Wholesale markets for agricultural products (hereinafter referred to as the WMAP) before the transition of Ukraine to market conditions of economic activity were absent and their construction began in the late 90's of the twentieth century. Beginning of the XXI century. Currently, their construction was suspended due to lack of public financial resources. There was a need to attract private capital and investment into the development of WMAP. WMAP as an enterprise of agrarian profile meets all the requirements stipulated by the Commercial Code and Ukrainian legislation. The development and operation of the WMAP should take into account economic and socio-legal conditions. Involving private firms and companies in developing an WMAP network is also appropriate in terms of the quality of market construction. The basis for cooperation between the state and private firms is legislation, in particular, the Law of Ukraine«On public-private partnership». However, it requires some changes and additions concerning the development of the wholesale markets' network. The article presents the most common models (mechanisms) for developing the WMAP network on the basis of public-private partnership. In particular, these are Build, Operate, Transfer, BOOT (Build, Own, Operate, Transfer), BTO (Build, Operate, Transfer), BOO (Build, Own, Operate), BOMT (Build, Operate, Maintain, Transfer, DBOOT, Design, Build, Finance, Operate, DBFO (Design, Build, Finance, Operate) and provides a brief description of them, which involves the involvement of certain partners and their form, for example through concessions (IOT), authority for use and ownership rights, responsibility of a private partner for maintaining the WMAP created by him, including for ongoing repairs (VOMT), the responsibility of a private partner not only for construction but also for its design (DBOOT). The proposed WMAP business model, which includes key partners (international financial organizations and international technical assistance organizations, local and regional administration, sanitary and epidemiological and veterinary services, service organizations). Key activities include infrastructure management, marketing and advertising activities. The main resources are brand, customer database, software, human, financial and logistics. The value proposition includes European standards for wholesale trade, information and consulting support, and stockpile storage. The business model reflects the principles of customer relationships, as well as customer segments, which include farmers and agribusinesses, agro cooperatives, wholesalers, logistics centers. It is expected that in the structure of incomes 50% will be revenues from the lease of squares in pavilions, 23% for entry into the territory, 23% from the lease of space for sale from cars, and 4%–other services, including advertising. ; В статті проводиться аналіз відповідності ОРСП як підприємницького суб'єкта діяльності в світлі Господарського кодексу та Законів України. Розбудова і діяльність ОРСП повинна враховувати економічні та соціально – правові умови, рівень фінансових ресурсів , а також відсутність в Україні компаній, які мають достатній досвід в розробці техніко – економічного обґрунтування і організації побудови ОРСП згідно прийнятих європейських і світових стандартів. В статті подаються найбільш поширені в світі моделі (механізми) розбудови ринків з участю державного та приватного капіталу. В Україні прийнятий Закон «Про державно – приватне партнерство», який може бути основоположним в розробці моделей розбудови і функціонування ОРСП, але він ще вимагає доопрацювання в сфері розбудови і діяльності мережі ОРСП. Розглядається приклад бізнес – моделі ОРСП.