Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
IFRS-Bilanzanalyse: case by case
In: UTB M (Medium-Format) 2849
In: Betriebsberater Studium
In: Betriebsberater Studium
Kollektives Arbeitsrecht: case by case
In: UTB 2794
In: Rechtswissenschaft
In: Betriebs-Berater
In: Studium
Individuelles Arbeitsrecht: case by case
In: UTB 2732
In: Rechtswissenschaft
In: Betriebs-Berater
In: Studium
Presentación Monográfico "Jóvenes comprometidas en el antifranquismo y la democracia"
In: Historia contemporánea: revista del Departamento de Historia Contemporánea, Band 1, Heft 54, S. 11-14
ISSN: 1130-2402, 2340-0277
Presentación del Monográfico
Breaking the silence ceiling: how gender violence became into a social problem in Spain through media and politics
This research presents the explanatory model of the process of reconstruction of the ʺsocial problemʺ of Intimate Partner Violence (I.P.V) in Spain during last five years, with special attention to the role of media in this process. Using a content analysis of the three more diffused general newspapers, a content analysis of the minutes of the Parliament, and the statistics of the police reports and murders, from January of 1997 to December of 2001, it observes the relationship between the evolution of the incidence of Intimate Partner Violence (I.P.V) (measured by the number of deaths and the number of police reports) and the evolution of stories about this topic in press. It also studies the interconnection of the two previous variables with the political answer to the problem (measured by the interventions on the I.P.V. in the Senate and in the Congress). Data shows that, even though police reports have increased due to the contribution of politics and media, I.P.V murders keep on growing up.
BASE
The Curious Case of the Disputed Rabbits: A Visual Case
In: Darden Case No. UVA-OM-1675
SSRN
Working paper
The Case Against Case-by-Case: Courts Identifying Categorical Rights to Counsel in Basic Human Needs Civil Cases
In: Drake Law Review, Band 61, Heft 763
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
Case study research and critical IR: the case for the extended case methodology
Discussions on case study methodology in International Relations (IR) have historically been dominated by positivist and neopositivist approaches. However, these are problematic for critical IR research, pointing to the need for a non-positivist case study methodology. To address this issue, this paper introduces and adapts the extended case methodology as a critical, reflexivist approach to case study research, whereby the case is constructed through a dynamic interaction with theory, rather than selected, and knowledge is produced through extensions rather than generalisation. Insofar as it seeks to study the world in complex and non-linear terms, take context and positionality seriously, and generate explicitly political and emancipatory knowledge, the extended case methodology is consistent with the ontological and epistemological commitments of several critical IR approaches. Its potential is illustrated in the final part of the paper with reference to researching the socio-economic dimension of transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
BASE
Taking Great Cases: Lessons from the "Rosenberg" Case
The most watched case of the 1952 Supreme Court Term was not Brown v. Board of Education, but the case of convicted atomic spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Sentenced to death in April 1951 for passing atomic secrets to the Soviets, the Rosenbergs dominated the news and divided the country. Their case came at the height of Cold War America's obsession with Communism. Senator Joe McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee were exposing alleged Communists in the federal government and Hollywood, and the U.S. military was fighting the Korean War to try to stop the spread of Communism abroad. The thought that domestic spies had helped the Soviets manufacture an atomic bomb tapped into people's worst fears. More than 70 percent of Americans wanted the Rosenbergs to pay for their crimes with their lives,' but a vocal minority had serious questions about their guilt or innocence, the fairness of their trial, and/or the harshness of their death sentences. The case was so controversial that outgoing President Harry Truman passed off the couple's clemency petition to his successor, Dwight Eisenhower. The Rosenbergs' executions sparked contentious rallies in major U.S. cities and violent protests abroad. Brown and Rosenberg demonstrate the Court's different approaches toward taking "great cases," of which Holmes declared, "like hard cases, make bad law." The Brown Court is often criticized for having done too much; the Rosenberg Court is criticized for not having done enough.
BASE