Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
53843 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Cover -- EU CITIZENSHIP -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- Introduction -- 1 Concepts of citizenship and identity: National vs. postnational paradigms -- Introduction -- Ethnicity, nationality and citizenship -- Universalist conception of citizenship -- Identity politics -- The emergence of European subjectivity -- Citizenship as discursive practice: The postmodern concept of citizenship -- Globalization and postnational model of citizenship -- 2 The European Union as a postnational political community -- Introduction -- Different paradigms of Europe and European citizenship -- The European Union: Towards the postmodern political community -- The spiritual and cultural dimension of Europe -- The idea of a European identity -- The question of European identity in the light of Brexit and migration crisis -- 3 The Postmodern Europe: Democracy to come -- Introduction -- The postmodern conception of law -- The postmodern Europe: Problems and perspectives -- Europe's migration crisis: A challenge to democracy -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Name Index -- Subject Index.
In: Ní Mhurchú , A 2010 , ' Citizenship as absolute space, citizenship as contingent trace ' Alternatives: Local, Global, Political , vol 35 , no. 4 , pp. 373-400 . DOI:10.1177/030437541003500403
Using the distinction that Richard Ashley and Rob Walker drew in 1990 between two possible critical responses to crisis and the question of sovereignty, this article argues that two strands of thought can be identified, each producing a different understanding of what it means to become a citizen in Ireland. One strand articulates citizenship in terms of sovereign autonomous subjectivity, and thus in terms of horizontal or territorial relations between here and there, us and them, inside and outside. The other strand (re)articulates citizenship in terms of ambiguous paradoxical subjectivity that challenges the modern framing of the politics of citizenship as necessarily needing to be conceptualized in terms of absolute space. This divergence is explored through the 2004 Irish Citizenship Referendum. The concept of citizenship as "trace" is introduced in an attempt to capture how citizenship is reconceptualized differently in the second strand. It is argued that understanding this divergence is necessary in order to consider how classical conceptions of time and space are specifically integral to structures of sovereign power and how perspectives that take these as their starting point fail to account for the increasing emphasis on the nonsovereign manner in which citizenship is being experienced vis-à-vis migration.
BASE
In: Social policy and administration, Band 54, Heft 3, S. 361-374
ISSN: 1467-9515
AbstractAlthough the concept of citizenship is a widely used theoretical framework within political philosophy, its use in the field of mental health remains underexplored. Within this context, citizenship emphasises the social inclusion and participation of people who are marginalized and offers a more social and relational view of services and support for people with mental health problems than has been common in mental health systems of care. At the same time, however, the citizenship approach has operated in the context of systems of care in the United States that favour highly individualized conceptions of, and approaches to, care, and these systems of care operate in the social and political context of highly individualized concepts of the citizen. In this article building on the work of other citizenship scholars, we argue that a collective form of citizenship, grounded in the 5Rs framework, holds the individual and collective in creative tension. Furthermore, the paper applies this model to the domain of mental health, where people are treated in individualistic ways and experience marginalisation, making the collective dimension imperative and promoting participation, empowerment and the contribution for social change to people with mental health problems. Our theoretical framework of collective citizenship, while geared toward the needs of persons with mental health problems, also contributes to recent citizenship theory on the inclusion of marginalized, stigmatised, and excluded groups. We illustrate the application of this approach through an ethnographic‐participant observation case study of a collective citizenship group with which we are associated.
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- CHAPTER ONE What Is Socratic Citizenship? -- CHAPTER TWO PUBLIC OPINION, MORAL TRUTH, AND CITIZENSHIP -- CHAPTER THREE MORALITY, INDIVIDUALISM, AND POLITICS The -- CHAPTER FOUR CONFLICT, INTEGRITY, AND THE ILLUSIONS OF POLITICS -- CHAPTER FIVE CITIZENSHIP VERSUS PHILOSOPHY -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Index
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift: PVS : German political science quarterly, Band 51, Heft 3, S. 475-503
ISSN: 0032-3470
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of citizenship and globalisation studies, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 10-23
ISSN: 2450-8632
The paper begins with an examination of three ideal types citizenship which are not necessarily mutual exclusive. The first type is national citizenship, typically associated with ethno-nationalism. The second form is social citizenship or 'welfare citizenship' refers to the creation of social rights and is closely connected to civil-society institutions rather than to the state or market. The third form of citizenship identifies the citizen with participation in the work force emphasizing self-reliance and autonomy. In this discussion, I argue that with economic globalization and the development of neo-liberal strategies the various forms of citizenship have converged towards a new model of passive citizenship in which the state is or has withdrawn from commitment to full employment and the provision of social security, especially universal provision of welfare services, and civil-society institutions have been eroded. The result is the emergence of the apolitical,isolated citizen as consumer. The fourth model of citizenship presupposes a consumer society, a weak state and the decline of civic institutions, where the passive citizen becomes a consumer of privatized goods and services. The rise of a fourth model of citizenship – the consumer-citizen – can be interpreted as a logical consequence of financialization.1
1 Some aspects of this chapter first appeared in Bryan S. Turner (2010), 'Ralf Dahrendorf on Citizenship and Life Chances', Citizenship Studies, 14 (2): 237–43.
In: American Democracy in Action Ser
Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright -- Contents -- Chapter 1: What Is Citizenship? -- Chapter 2: Being an Active Citizen -- Chapter 3: Knowledge Is Power -- Chapter 4: Have Your Voice Heard -- Chapter 5: Grassroots Advocacy -- Chapter 6: Volunteering -- Visual Summary: Active Citizenship in Action -- Glossary -- For More Information -- Index -- Back Cover
In: The Library of Contemporary Essays in Political Theory and Public Policy