1. Comparative Government
In: American political science review, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 389-393
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 389-393
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Comparative government and politics series
In: Studies in political science 21
In: American political science review, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 222-224
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 848-851
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 363
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Routledge library editions
In: Political science 10
In: Routledge library editions. Political science, v. 10
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 197-213
ISSN: 0261-3794
THE PERIODIC REDRAWING OF ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES IS A NECESSITY IN ANY EQUITABLE SINGLE-MEMBER REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM. IT IS APPROACHED IN VERY DIFFERENT WAYS IN THE UNITED STATES AND IN BRITAIN. IN AMERICA, AGAINST A BACKGROUND OF CONTINUOUS INTERVENTION BY THE COURTS, PARTY POLITICS AND LEGISLATIVE FIXING ARE ENDEMIC. BRITAIN (AND THE OTHER ESTABLISHED DEMOCRACIES OF THE COMMONWEALTH) HAVE ALL TURNED INCREASINGLY TO NEUTRAL COMMISSIONS THAT ARE IN THEORY (AND, ON THE WHOLE, IN PRACTICE) BLIND TO CONSIDERATIONS OF PARTY ADVANTAGE. THIS ARTICLE EXPLORES HOW THIS CONTRAST HAS DEVELOPED. THE REASONS BEHIND THE PROFOUND DIFFERENCES IN PROCEDURE OFFER UNEXPECTEDLY RICH INSIGHTS INTO COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT.
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 4, S. 197-213
ISSN: 0261-3794
United States, British, and British Commonwealth country approaches to the redrawing of electoral boundaries.
In: Talking politics: a journal for students and teachers of politics, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 47
ISSN: 0955-8780
ISSN: 1612-7013
In: Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 166-167