Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
84 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International relations in a constructed world
In: Cambridge studies in international relations 83
World Affairs Online
In: International relations in a constructed world
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 300-329
ISSN: 1471-6437
Epistemology, as I understand it, is a branch of philosophy especially concerned with general questions about how we can know various things or at least justify our beliefs about them. It questions what counts as evidence and what are reasonable sources of doubt. Traditionally, episte-mology focuses on pervasive and apparently basic assumptions covering a wide range of claims to knowledge or justified belief rather than very specific, practical puzzles. For example, traditional epistemologists ask "How do we know there are material objects?" and not "How do you know which are the female beetles?" Similarly,moralepistemology, as I understand it, is concerned with general questions about how we can know or justify our beliefs about moral matters. Its focus, again, is on quite general, pervasive, and apparently basic assumptions about what counts as evidence, what are reasonable sources of doubt, and what are the appropriate procedures for justifying particular moral claims.
The author of this chapter defines the tension within Oakeshott's philosophy on socio-political construction & deconstructs his conceptualization of constructivism & relativism in relationship to truth. Although Oakeshott's philosophy can relate to a strong constructivism, his anti-rationalism & conceptualization of truth preclude his acceptance of the "rational" constructivist political agenda. Various philosophers' views on truth (Hacking, McCullagh, Sellars, Goldman) are applied as problematizations of Oakeshott's worldview. Oakeshott's ambiguous relativism is recognized to have a misplaced skepticism & inconsistent relativism (Podoksik) emanating from the irreducible pluralism based on the distinct spheres of knowledge generated by separate domains of modes. The severe critiques of the sociological arenas of politics, education & science exemplify this misplacement. The irreducible plurality of his modes (science, history) require different methods of inquiry to produce knowledge, thus forbidding cross disciplinary commonalities leading to an assumption of coherentism that should direct Oakeshott to relativism. But, reciprocal relations between conceptual creativity & nature are excluded by his separation of modal knowledge. 60 References. J. Harwell
In: Social philosophy today: an annual journal from the North American Society for Social Philosophy, Band 18, S. 167-181
ISSN: 2153-9448
In: Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 8
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 424-453
ISSN: 1552-7441
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 225-237
ISSN: 1502-3923
Contemporary liberal political justification is often accused of preaching to the converted: liberal principles are acceptable only to people already committed to liberal values. Catriona McKinnon addresses this important criticism by arguing that self-respect and its social conditions should be placed at the heart of the liberal approach to justification. A commitment to self-respect delivers a commitment to the liberal values of toleration and public reason, but self-respect itself is not an exclusively liberal value
In: Organization: the critical journal of organization, theory and society, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 531-535
ISSN: 1350-5084
In: Theologische Bibliothek Töpelmann 127
Main description: Spätestens seit dem "linguistic turn" wird in den verschiedenen geisteswissenschaftlichen Disziplinen neu diskutiert, wie sich Erkenntnis und Interpretation von Wirklichkeit vollziehen. In Aufnahme der neueren geschichtstheoretischen Diskussion werden die erkenntnistheoretischen Voraussetzungen der Konstruktion von Geschichte untersucht, und es wird gezeigt, was dies für die Konstruktion einer spezifisch christlichen Sicht auf die Geschichte bedeutet.
In: Critical security series
World Affairs Online
In: Konstruktivismus und systemisches Denken