Suchergebnisse

Consumer dispute can be resolved by litigation and non-litigation based on agreement of the parties. Presence of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) considered as a new hope for parties because thats's give an option to resolve consumer dispute, through BPSK it is expected that dispute can be resolved in a simple, fast, and low-cost manner. However, in fact the verdict issued by BPSK has the disadvantage of not having specificity, it caused by the article 54 point 3 of Consumer Protection Law mention that the BPSK decision is final and binding but can still be submitted for objection, even cancellation, then the absence of executorial power on the BPSK decision causes this BPSK decision to have no merit. ; Consumer dispute can be resolved by litigation and non-litigation based on agreement of the parties. Presence of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) considered as a new hope for parties because thats's give an option to resolve consumer dispute, through BPSK it is expected that dispute can be resolved in a simple, fast, and low-cost manner. However, in fact the verdict issued by BPSK has the disadvantage of not having specificity, it caused by the article 54 point 3 of Consumer Protection Law mention that the BPSK decision is final and binding but can still be submitted for objection, even cancellation, then the absence of executorial power on the BPSK decision causes this BPSK decision to have no merit.

AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI ; AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI

This research aims to formulate and to analyze the urgency of the establishment of Consumer Dispute Resolution Body (BPSK) in Regency of Bekasi. The method of analysis uses descriptive analysis of both qualitative and quantitative. Meanwhile, the method of data collection is done through literature studies and in-depth interviews. The results show that the urgency of the formation of BPSK in Regency of Bekasi is based on variety of reasons. First, BPSK as a government agency is established to respond to the mandate of Act No. 8 1999 to form the agency in each regency. Secondly, BPSK is formed to anticipate the momentum of the ASEAN Economic Community. Thirdly, it is also founded to react to the improvement of economic development in Regency of Bekasi, which is accompanied by the increasing level of prosperity and the level of community awareness of the rights of workers as consumers. Fourth, BPSK is constructed based on the experience of other regions which shows that consumers are in dire need of a neutral government body formed to protect the interests of consumers if they get unfair treatment from business actors. As the same time, business actors also require the same body that can objectively and impartially handle cases involving their business activities. Keywords: Consumer Protection, BPSK, Regency of Bekasi ; This research aims to formulate and to analyze the urgency of the establishment of Consumer Dispute Resolution Body (BPSK) in Regency of Bekasi. The method of analysis uses descriptive analysis of both qualitative and quantitative. Meanwhile, the method of data collection is done through literature studies and in-depth interviews. The results show that the urgency of the formation of BPSK in Regency of Bekasi is based on variety of reasons. First, BPSK as a government agency is established to respond to the mandate of Act No. 8 1999 to form the agency in each regency. Secondly, BPSK is formed to anticipate the momentum of the ASEAN Economic Community. Thirdly, it is also founded to react to the improvement of economic development in Regency of Bekasi, which is accompanied by the increasing level of prosperity and the level of community awareness of the rights of workers as consumers. Fourth, BPSK is constructed based on the experience of other regions which shows that consumers are in dire need of a neutral government body formed to protect the interests of consumers if they get unfair treatment from business actors. As the same time, business actors also require the same body that can objectively and impartially handle cases involving their business activities. Keywords: Consumer Protection, BPSK, Regency of Bekasi