Suchergebnisse

Der Allgemeine Teil des Strafrechts zählt wegen seines hohen Abstraktionsgrades und der nahezu unüberschaubaren Zahl von Meinungsstreitigkeiten zu den komplexesten und kompliziertesten Materien in der juristischen Ausbildung. Die Neuauflage des Lehrbuchs von Kindhäuser bringt die ausbildungsrelevanten Themenbereiche verständlich, komprimiert und leserfreundlich strukturiert nahe. Es eignet sich sowohl zur ersten Einführung in den Allgemeinen Teil des Strafrechts als auch zur Wiederholung des Stoffes

Im Kriminalprozess hängt die Wahrheit der im Urteil erzählten Geschichte eines Verbrechens nicht zuletzt davon ab, ob sich die beteiligten Juristen selbst gerecht werden können: Je weiter man von der Wahrheit entfernt bleibt, desto weniger gerecht fallen Schuldfeststellung und Reaktion oder Sanktion aus.Um sich gerecht werden zu können – Selbst-Gerechtigkeit–, muss man die eigene Selbstgerechtigkeit überwinden. Tatsächlich lösen institutionelle Routinen jedoch einen psychischen Abwehrvorgang aus und verstärken ihn. Die Auflösung von Selbstgerechtigkeit gelingt daher am ehesten in einer deinstitutionalisierenden Umgebung, in der Selbsterkenntnis auch bezüglich der professionellen Person und ihres Handelns möglich ist.In seiner, schon in der ersten Auflage Maßstäbe setzenden Untersuchung beschreibt Dirk Fabricius zum einen die Vorgänge der "gesellschaftlichen Produktion von Unbewusstheit" (Erdheim) in der Strafjustiz durch und bei den beteiligten Juristen. Zum anderen berichtet er von exemplarischen Erfahrungen, die über die psychoanalytisch inspirierte "Themenzentrierte Interaktion" (Ruth C. Cohn) zu mehr Selbst-Gerechtigkeit führen können.Die zweite, vollständig überarbeitete Auflage zeigt auf, dass die Fragestellung auch nach 20 Jahren nichts von Ihrer Aktualität verloren hat

Mit Inkrafttreten des Völkerstrafgesetzbuches am 30. Juni 2002 ist der Grundstein für ein "deutsches Völkerstrafrecht" gelegt worden. Heute, gute zehn Jahre später, scheint die damals spürbare "Völkerstrafrechtseuphorie" einer gewissen Ernüchterung gewichen zu sein. Ein Grund dafür mag die geringe Zahl von Verfahren sein, die eingeleitet wurden. In dem Band, der auf ein im Mai 2012 an der Universität Hamburg durchgeführtes Symposium zurückgeht, wird eine erste Bilanz gezogen und nach den Perspektiven der Verfolgung von Völkerrechtsverbrechen in Deutschland gefragt. Das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch wird in seinen historischen und kriminalpolitischen Kontext gesetzt, es werden strafrechtsdogmatische Schlüsselfragen, insbesondere zur Regelung der Vorgesetztenverantwortlichkeit sowie zur anstehenden Umsetzung des Aggressionsverbrechens, diskutiert, es wird der Frage nach den Ursachen für den - und den möglichen Konsequenzen aus dem - schmalen praktischen Anwendungsbereich des Völkerstrafgesetzbuchs nachgegangen, schließlich wird das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch aus europäischer, internationaler und völkerrechtlicher Perspektive bewertet. Mit Beiträgen von: Bundesanwalt Thomas Beck, GBA Karlsruhe | Eva Bohle, LL.M. (UWC), Universität Hamburg | Prof. Dr. Martin Böse, Universität Bonn | Dr. Boris Burghardt, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | Prof. Dr. Alberto di Martino, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa | Julia Geneuss, LL.M. (NYU), Universität Hamburg | Staatssekretärin Dr. Birgit Grundmann, BMJ, Berlin | Sarah Imani, LL.M. (NYU), Universität Hamburg | Prof. Dr. Florian Jeßberger, Universität Hamburg | RA Wolfgang Kaleck, European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, Berlin | RiStGH Dr. h.c. Hans-Peter Kaul, Den Haag | Prof. em. Dr. Rainer Keller, Universität Hamburg | Prof. Dr. André Klip, Universität Maastricht | Prof. Maximo Langer, S.J.D., University of California at Los Angeles | Prof. Dr. Reinhard Merkel, Universität Hamburg | Prof. Dr. Stefan Oeter, Universität Hamburg | Michael Ratner, Center for Constitutional Rights, New York | Prof. Dr. Christoph Safferling, LL.M., Universität Marburg | RiOLG Prof. Dr. Joachim Vogel, Universität München | Prof. Dr. Bettina Weißer, Universität Münster | Prof. Dr. Gerhard Werle, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | Prof. Dr. Andreas Zimmermann, LL.M. (Harvard), Universität Potsdam

Theory of international criminal law -- Principles of liability and participation in international criminal law -- Defences in international criminal law -- State jurisdiction and immunities -- War crimes and grave breaches -- Crimes against humanity -- Genocide -- Offences against the person -- International criminal law of the sea -- Terrorism -- Transnational offences 1 -- Transnational offences 2 -- Extradition -- Abduction -- Mutual legal assistance -- Mutual legal assistance : national perspectives -- International police co-operation -- Evidence before the ad hoc tribunals -- Nuremberg, Tokyo and the birth of modern international criminal law -- The international tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda -- The permanent international criminal court -- Internationalised domestic criminal tribunals

The article is devoted to the analysis of scientific concepts and legal terminology of criminal legislation, the identification of their relationship and role in lawmaking in the development and adoption of quality in form and perfect in content laws on criminal liability. The logical structure of criminal law concepts (content and volume) and their industry types are considered: specific, generic, evaluative concepts and categories as fundamental concepts of law; developed the basic rules for their determination and consolidation in the text of the law. The basic requirements (quality parameters) that are presented to legal terms are identified, with the help of which the law on criminal liability defines legal concepts that comprise the content of legal norms, legal structures and other legal formations that are components of this law. The proposals aimed at improving the form and content of criminal law are formulated. The problems of scientific concepts and legal terminology considered in the article, their analysis and formulated proposals are aimed, as a whole, at improving legislative activity on the development and adoption of high-quality criminal-form laws in form and perfect in content. Legal concepts and legal terminology - organically interconnected phenomena of criminal law – are specifically logical and linguistic means of displaying and consolidating verbally in criminal liability laws (in their norms, legal structures, other regulatory legal conditions) subject to legal regulation formations) of phenomena (objects) of reality that are subject to criminal law regulation. The deeper the legal concepts are developed, the more perfect the legal terminology used in the text of the law, the better the positive law, which should be objectively capable of optimally regulating public relations in the field of criminal law.

This article explores the relationship between law and social work. It navigates the importance of the relationship and the similarities and differences between the objectives of legal and social work practitioners. It critically reviews transnational conventions and how individual countries have legislated to safeguard and promote the welfare of children and adults at risk. It reflects on how far nation-states uphold human rights and the rule of law and evaluates how social work has been positioned and has performed in different legislative contexts.

he purpose of this work is to study the historical and legal phenomena of penetration into the legal space of Russia provisions of Hebrew law in the process of global reception of Christianized law of the Eastern Roman Empire in the 11th 17th centuries. Judaica not only influenced the formation of domestic legal acts (in the aspects of legal goal-setting, the specifics of legal technology, etc.) the provisions of the Law of Moses were included as an autonomous segment in systematized domestic codes and were subject to direct application by state authorities of Russia. Understanding the true historical roots of the formation of domestic law forms the foundation for its development currently and release the reform of Russian criminal law from artificially imposed dependence on the trends in the development of European public law.

The growing inter-relatedness between EC and EU law with national criminal law can be well illustrated with the example of enforcement of EU law. Criminal law is one of the latest examples of increasing European integration within the perimeters of explicit competences of EU/EC law which additionally is driven ahead by what functionalist theories of European integration might refer to as a spill-over of approaches. Necessities of crossborder crime and criminal enforcement make cooperation necessary. The latter takes place to a certain degree on the basis of positive law established on the basis of the Treaties. It also takes place in the context of evolutionary development of what one might refer to as 'administrative networks.'

"The legal position of convicted offenders is complex, as are the social consequences that can result from a criminal conviction. After they have served their sentences, custodial or not, convicted offenders often continue to be subject to numerous restrictions, in many cases indefinitely, due to their criminal conviction. In short, criminal convictions can have adverse legal consequences that may affect convicted offenders in several aspects of their lives. In turn, these legal consequences can have broader social consequences. Legal consequences are often not formally part of the criminal law, but are regulated by different areas of law, such as administrative law, constitutional law, labour law, civil law, and immigration law. For this reason, they are often obscured from judges as well as from defendants and their legal representatives in the courtroom. The breadth, severity and longevity and often hidden nature of these restrictions raises the question of whether offenders' fundamental rights are sufficiently protected. This book explores the nature and extent of the legal consequences of criminal convictions in Europe, Australia and the USA. It addresses the following questions: What legal consequences can a criminal conviction have? How do these consequences affect convicted offenders? And how can and should these consequences be limited by law?"--Bloomsbury Publishing

The article provides a comparative legal analysis of the criminal law of the CIS member states, the content of the norms defining the scope of criminal law. The author compares the approaches of criminal law on the territory of the CIS, the legal consequences of conviction for crimes committed in a foreign state, issues of extradition, timeliness, retroactive force of the criminal law recognized in the legislation of the CIS member states. On the basis of their positive experience, well grounded proposals and comments were made to improve the criminal legislation.

The article deals with certain problems arising out of implementation of criminal liability of legal entities in Ukraine. The author researches experience of criminal liability of legal entities in some foreign countries and analyzes existing problems of this institute. Foreign and national approaches to criminal liability of legal entities have been compared. The issue of incompliance between international standards in criminal law and traditional approaches to the main institutes of criminal law in Ukraine has been considered. The article deals with theoretical and practical application of criminal liability against legal entities. Grounds for criminal liability and types of punishment which can be applied to legal entities and their future implementation in Ukraine have been emphasized. It has been established that economic imfluence is the most effective against legal entities. That is why the most common type of sanctions for legal entities is fine. Implementation of criminal liability of legal entities in foreign legislation was a significant step towards counteraction to illegal activities of these entities. Foreign experience is useful and efficient for future implementation of European integration of Ukraine and attempts to solve existing problems related to bringing of legal entities to liability. At the same time, it would be possible to use experience of the state which implemented the most effective mechanisms of impact on legal entities for corruption and other crimes. For national legislation this step is really revolutionary. But if the legislator is interested that this institute operates effectively certain amendments and supplements to the Criminal Code of Ukraine are needed.