Suchergebnisse

The statute is assigned to the theoretical foundations of the sphere of public administration, and the very establishment of such theories and practices in the organs of the microscopic self-regulation and organs of the viconavcha power. The foreign and the vital theoretical foundations were analyzed, as well as the prospects of that success in the future in Ukraine. The main changes and shortcomings of the technologies and theories are indicated. There is a lot of visnovka and boule presented propositions, as well as a thorough understanding of the introduction of new and old theoretical aspects of administration, as well as the introduction of new and new theoretical foundations of administration in public administration. For a large bulo, a sufficiently well-primed progress has been made for the present day of an unviable problem for our state and the world. That is, at the present moment, we are guilty of admitting the basic theory of administrative control at the public administration, among other common topics we are guilty of the main thesis, to which an article is assigned

The statute is assigned to the theoretical foundations of the sphere of public administration, and the very establishment of such theories and practices in the organs of the microscopic self-regulation and organs of the viconavcha power. The foreign and the vital theoretical foundations were analyzed, as well as the prospects of that success in the future in Ukraine. The main changes and shortcomings of the technologies and theories are indicated. There is a lot of visnovka and boule presented propositions, as well as a thorough understanding of the introduction of new and old theoretical aspects of administration, as well as the introduction of new and new theoretical foundations of administration in public administration. For a large bulo, a sufficiently well-primed progress has been made for the present day of an unviable problem for our state and the world. That is, at the present moment, we are guilty of admitting the basic theory of administrative control at the public administration, among other common topics we are guilty of the main thesis, to which an article is assigned

The provisions of Criminal procedure charter devoted to the representation of proofs by the participants of criminal proceeding are analyzed in the article. The author accentuates that the current criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine has inherited a lot of progressive ideas implemented by Criminal procedure charter, in particular the authorization of the participants of criminal proceeding by the right to present proofs.

The article deals with subjects of military administration based on the analysis of features of state agencies. It has been established that by using interdisciplinary analysis it is possible to disclose their main features. Attention has been drawn that each state agency has its features based on legal nature, designation, specifics and operation activities. It has been established that the main functions of the state agencies are that they are established in accordance with the procedure and on the grounds provided for by legislation; they have powers of authority which the state vest them to fulfill the functions on behalf of it; they have a certain organizational and economic independence in the structure of state apparatus and in the mechanism of the state; they have types and forms of activities, cooperation with other state agencies provided for by law; they have their place and role in the state mechanism, in other words, they have their 'legal status'; they are vested with powers of authority, competence and necessary means for fulfillment of tasks of the state when it manages certain spheres of public life. It has been confirmed that various subjects of military administration have a willful and forceful power which is more evident comparing to other types of public power (effective legislation stipulates legal liability including criminal one for failure to follow the commander's order). It has been stated that military administration which follows from provisions of legal acts is exercised not only by these bodies but by its management. Management is not included in bodies of military administration, but they are subjects of military administration with all the features. It has been proposed to use more general definition like 'subjects of military administration' which will allow to solve unsolved issues.

The article deals with certain problems arising out of implementation of criminal liability of legal entities in Ukraine. The author researches experience of criminal liability of legal entities in some foreign countries and analyzes existing problems of this institute. Foreign and national approaches to criminal liability of legal entities have been compared. The issue of incompliance between international standards in criminal law and traditional approaches to the main institutes of criminal law in Ukraine has been considered. The article deals with theoretical and practical application of criminal liability against legal entities. Grounds for criminal liability and types of punishment which can be applied to legal entities and their future implementation in Ukraine have been emphasized. It has been established that economic imfluence is the most effective against legal entities. That is why the most common type of sanctions for legal entities is fine. Implementation of criminal liability of legal entities in foreign legislation was a significant step towards counteraction to illegal activities of these entities. Foreign experience is useful and efficient for future implementation of European integration of Ukraine and attempts to solve existing problems related to bringing of legal entities to liability. At the same time, it would be possible to use experience of the state which implemented the most effective mechanisms of impact on legal entities for corruption and other crimes. For national legislation this step is really revolutionary. But if the legislator is interested that this institute operates effectively certain amendments and supplements to the Criminal Code of Ukraine are needed.

Problem setting. Legal support for the processes that have been observed in the political and socio-economic fields of Ukraine over the last decade have become increasingly relevant and urgent. The scrupulous and compulsory observance and implementation of the norms adopted in a civilized society is the key to the stable development of the state, therefore the consolidation of efforts to strengthen the rule of law and order is a paramount task of all the state and governmental institutions. Implementation by the state of administrative functions in the field of justice is the vector that determines the course and direction of actions for the development of Ukrainian statehood.Recent research and publications analysis. Such researchers as I. Artemenko, N. Zhelezniak, Y. Melnyk, I. Mykulets, L. Nalyvaiko, I. Onopchuk, S. Thurin et al. in their scientific works raised the questions dedicated to the main principles of public administration in the field of justice. However, their publications mainly reflect only certain aspects of the concept of justice, legal status of justice bodies and peculiarities of public administration in the mentioned area, while complex approach to understanding of the problems of organizational and legal principles of public administration in the field of justice of Ukraine is not disclosed.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The purpose of this article is to evaluate theoretical approaches to understanding the essence of organizational and legal foundations of public administration in the field of justice of Ukraine, to analyze the activities and powers of the main authorities in the field of justice and to present proposals for development of Ukrainian justice in general.Paper main body. The article considers theoretical approaches to understanding the essence of organizational and legal principles of public administration in the field of justice of Ukraine. It is determined that administration in the field of justice should be understood as activities aimed at fulfillment of tasks of organizational nature for exercise of rights and interests of legal entities, individuals and the state, as well as the task of strengthening the law and order in the country. Specific features inherent in the administration of justice are considered, their characteristics are presented.Emphasis is placed on the fact that one of the peculiarities of justice is the plurality of objects in this area of administration. Such objects of justice as judicial institutions, notary offices, civil registration bodies, forensic institutions and the bar are presented for consideration. It was also notes, that they all have different legal status, differ in their purpose and nature of competence.Attention was focused on the organizational aspect of the activities of the judicial bodies, since in most cases they address organizational issues. It is argued that this feature is characterized by the fact that the vast majority of judicial bodies in the course of their activity is independent and carry out actions that are advisory.It was substantiated that the organizational aspect of functioning of judicial bodies is closely related to the legal one, since statutory instruments are the basis for functioning of institutions providing law and order in the society. It was noted that the main purpose of administration in the field of justice is to ensure the legality, organization of protection of rights and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, as well as the state. Administrative and legal regulation in the field of justice is carried out on the basis of the following statutory instruments: the Laws of Ukraine "On Notaries", dated September 02, 1993, "On the Bar and Advocacy", dated December 19, 1992, "On State Registration of Civil Status Acts", dated July 01, 2010, "On Bodies and Persons Who Perform the Enforcement of Court Decisions and Decisions of Other Authorities", dated June 02, 2016, Regulation on the State Migration Service of Ukraine, dated September 20, 2014, etc.The interrelation between organizational and legal aspects of the public administration in the field of justice is presented; it is noted that this interrelation can be traced on the example of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. It is noted that, along with the Ministry of Justice, State Archive Service of Ukraine, State Executive Service of Ukraine, State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine, State Registration Service of Ukraine, State Service of Ukraine for the Protection of Personal Data also belong to the system of entities in the field of justice of Ukraine. It is noted that the Constitution stipulates that the judicial bodies of Ukraine have a prominent place among the law enforcement agencies of the state.The basic powers of the entities in the field of justice are considered. It is noted that in practice in practice, there is a distinction between two categories: judicial bodies and bodies of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. It is substantiated that the bodies of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine are a part of the bodies of justice, as these bodies as it is much wider in structure and in the range of authorities.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. It is argued that the priorities for the development of the Ukrainian justice today are the following: formation of a new, higher level of legal awareness and legal culture of citizens; reforming of the judicial system to ensure the accessibility of justice and the effectiveness of judicial protection; reforming of the criminal justice and the criminal executive system; creating legal frameworks for prevention and counteraction to corruption; ensuring the efficiency of the enforcement of court decisions; improvement of the system of protection of state interests in the courts of Ukraine; formation of a free legal aid system.Perspective of further research in this area is represented by the study of institutional aspects of public administration in the field of justice and priorities for development of the institutional sector. ; Розглянуто теоретичні підходи до розуміння сутності організаційно-правових засад державного управління у сфері юстиції України. Представлено авторське трактування сутності управління у сфері юстиції. Розглянуто особливі риси юстиції у контексті здійснення управлінських дій та подано їх характеристику. Обґрунтовано, що здійснення управлінських дій у сфері юстиції передбачає виконання їх органами, які уповноважені від імені держави реалізовувати відповідні функції, зважаючи на багатооб'єктність у цій галузі управління, та представлено перелік об'єктів юстиції. Розглянуто взаємозв'язок організаційного та правового аспектів у контексті державного управління у сфері юстиції. Запропоновано пріоритетні напрями розвитку української юстиції на перспективу.

Problem setting. Legal support for the processes that have been observed in the political and socio-economic fields of Ukraine over the last decade have become increasingly relevant and urgent. The scrupulous and compulsory observance and implementation of the norms adopted in a civilized society is the key to the stable development of the state, therefore the consolidation of efforts to strengthen the rule of law and order is a paramount task of all the state and governmental institutions. Implementation by the state of administrative functions in the field of justice is the vector that determines the course and direction of actions for the development of Ukrainian statehood.Recent research and publications analysis. Such researchers as I. Artemenko, N. Zhelezniak, Y. Melnyk, I. Mykulets, L. Nalyvaiko, I. Onopchuk, S. Thurin et al. in their scientific works raised the questions dedicated to the main principles of public administration in the field of justice. However, their publications mainly reflect only certain aspects of the concept of justice, legal status of justice bodies and peculiarities of public administration in the mentioned area, while complex approach to understanding of the problems of organizational and legal principles of public administration in the field of justice of Ukraine is not disclosed.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The purpose of this article is to evaluate theoretical approaches to understanding the essence of organizational and legal foundations of public administration in the field of justice of Ukraine, to analyze the activities and powers of the main authorities in the field of justice and to present proposals for development of Ukrainian justice in general.Paper main body. The article considers theoretical approaches to understanding the essence of organizational and legal principles of public administration in the field of justice of Ukraine. It is determined that administration in the field of justice should be understood as activities aimed at fulfillment of tasks of organizational nature for exercise of rights and interests of legal entities, individuals and the state, as well as the task of strengthening the law and order in the country. Specific features inherent in the administration of justice are considered, their characteristics are presented.Emphasis is placed on the fact that one of the peculiarities of justice is the plurality of objects in this area of administration. Such objects of justice as judicial institutions, notary offices, civil registration bodies, forensic institutions and the bar are presented for consideration. It was also notes, that they all have different legal status, differ in their purpose and nature of competence.Attention was focused on the organizational aspect of the activities of the judicial bodies, since in most cases they address organizational issues. It is argued that this feature is characterized by the fact that the vast majority of judicial bodies in the course of their activity is independent and carry out actions that are advisory.It was substantiated that the organizational aspect of functioning of judicial bodies is closely related to the legal one, since statutory instruments are the basis for functioning of institutions providing law and order in the society. It was noted that the main purpose of administration in the field of justice is to ensure the legality, organization of protection of rights and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, as well as the state. Administrative and legal regulation in the field of justice is carried out on the basis of the following statutory instruments: the Laws of Ukraine "On Notaries", dated September 02, 1993, "On the Bar and Advocacy", dated December 19, 1992, "On State Registration of Civil Status Acts", dated July 01, 2010, "On Bodies and Persons Who Perform the Enforcement of Court Decisions and Decisions of Other Authorities", dated June 02, 2016, Regulation on the State Migration Service of Ukraine, dated September 20, 2014, etc.The interrelation between organizational and legal aspects of the public administration in the field of justice is presented; it is noted that this interrelation can be traced on the example of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. It is noted that, along with the Ministry of Justice, State Archive Service of Ukraine, State Executive Service of Ukraine, State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine, State Registration Service of Ukraine, State Service of Ukraine for the Protection of Personal Data also belong to the system of entities in the field of justice of Ukraine. It is noted that the Constitution stipulates that the judicial bodies of Ukraine have a prominent place among the law enforcement agencies of the state.The basic powers of the entities in the field of justice are considered. It is noted that in practice in practice, there is a distinction between two categories: judicial bodies and bodies of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. It is substantiated that the bodies of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine are a part of the bodies of justice, as these bodies as it is much wider in structure and in the range of authorities.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. It is argued that the priorities for the development of the Ukrainian justice today are the following: formation of a new, higher level of legal awareness and legal culture of citizens; reforming of the judicial system to ensure the accessibility of justice and the effectiveness of judicial protection; reforming of the criminal justice and the criminal executive system; creating legal frameworks for prevention and counteraction to corruption; ensuring the efficiency of the enforcement of court decisions; improvement of the system of protection of state interests in the courts of Ukraine; formation of a free legal aid system.Perspective of further research in this area is represented by the study of institutional aspects of public administration in the field of justice and priorities for development of the institutional sector. ; Розглянуто теоретичні підходи до розуміння сутності організаційно-правових засад державного управління у сфері юстиції України. Представлено авторське трактування сутності управління у сфері юстиції. Розглянуто особливі риси юстиції у контексті здійснення управлінських дій та подано їх характеристику. Обґрунтовано, що здійснення управлінських дій у сфері юстиції передбачає виконання їх органами, які уповноважені від імені держави реалізовувати відповідні функції, зважаючи на багатооб'єктність у цій галузі управління, та представлено перелік об'єктів юстиції. Розглянуто взаємозв'язок організаційного та правового аспектів у контексті державного управління у сфері юстиції. Запропоновано пріоритетні напрями розвитку української юстиції на перспективу.

The article defines the essence and content of the principles of openness and transparency in criminal proceeding, connected with criminal proceeding organization, as well as problems of enforcement of named principles in criminal trial procedure. By comparison of the relevant articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine "On the Judiciary and Status of Judges of Ukraine", three intrinsic components of the transparency and openness of criminal justice can be distinguished. Firstly, it is the duty of the court to ensure transparency and openness of court proceedings, which is implemented by placing an announcement on the time, date and place of the court session, allowing the parties to the criminal process to familiarize themselves with the materials of the criminal proceedings, etc. Secondly, it is the right of the parties to a public and open trial, which consists of their rights to vowels and open court proceedings, awareness of the content of the claims and the opposition of the parties, familiarization with the materials of the criminal proceedings, to be heard in the court session, etc. Thirdly, it is the right of those who wish to be present at open court hearings, including the media, to disseminate and receive information on the activities of the court. In this regard, the subject of publicity in the criminal proceedings is not only information on the progress of the trial and its final results, but also information on the interim results of such activities. Also, the open consideration of cases enables individuals to directly familiarize themselves with the work of the court, and this increases his responsibility for the legitimate and correct resolution of the problem. In particular, it contributes to the reduction of the subjectivity of judges and allows all those who wish to ensure compliance with the legal procedures established in the procedural law of the case. At the same time, it should be noted that Ukrainian legislation in the constitutional norm and legislation on ...

The article deals with the necessity of introduction of electronic criminal proceedings in Ukraine. It is noted that today Ukrainian criminal procedural legislation has introduced mixed or partially electronic criminal process, that is, paper proceedings with elements of electronic fixation. In the process of formation of electronic criminal proceedings, which has recently started in Ukraine, it is important to properly use the benefits of electronic document management. Another advantage of the use of electronic criminal proceedings, to which the EED is integrated, is the instant exchange of documents between law enforcement and judicial authorities. The time of drafting the electronic document should reflect the time of the decision in criminal proceedings or the completion of the investigative (investigative) action. The legislation stipulates that the electronic document must contain temporal differences in the conduct of investigative (investigative) action or making procedural decision with the moment of their documentary fixation. In view of the criminal proceedings, any procedural document in electronic form can be considered as documented data (information), which is being signed, and the investigator (detective, prosecutor, investigating judge) and other participants in the criminal proceedings - the signatories, ie persons who sign this document using a personal digital signature. The electronic digital signature of the investigator (prosecutor, investigating judge) and the other participant in the criminal proceedings can be verified with a public key, which will allow the author and / or signatory of the procedural and / or other document to be identified. It is stated that when in accordance with the requirements of the CPC of Ukraine it is necessary to certify with the seal the authenticity of the signature on the documents and the correspondence of copies of the documents to the originals, as well as to ensure the integrity of electronic data and to identify the institution as a signer (author) ...

The main scientific achievements of foreign and domestic legal scholars in the field of research of the functions of rights in general are analyzed in order to reveal the concept of the functions of the people's right to the formation of justice and the mechanism of their implementation. It is pointed out that in the legal literature there is almost no legal construction of the right of citizens to form (participate) in the formation (organization) of the judiciary. Therefore, in view of the above, the concept of the right of the people to form and implement justice through the prism of political rights, which are the guideline that promotes the realization of democracy, has been clarified. This clarifies the meaning and essence of political rights, in particular, the right to elect power and the right to participate in government. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the Constitution of Ukraine proclaims the fundamental principle of a democratic state: "The bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in Ukraine is the people." This principle provides an opportunity for the people to independently form a vision of their future and the future of the state, to determine the powers and composition of public authorities, which are responsible for meeting the expectations of the people, and to control their activities is difficult. It is established that society controls the functioning of the court not only through the participation of citizens in the judicial process as jurors and lay judges, but also through the mechanisms of election of judges and their recall. That is, through the exercise of the right to form the judiciary and administer justice. Therefore, given that the formation of the judiciary by the people is carried out through elections, we consider it necessary to fully clarify the content and type of functions of democracy in the exercise of such a right, to explore the functions of elections in general. ; Проаналізовано основні наукові здобутки зарубіжних та вітчизняних вчених-юристів у сфері дослідження функцій прав взагалі для того, щоб розкрити поняття функцій права народу на формування здійснення правосуддя та механізму їх реалізації. Вказується, у юридичній літературі майже відсутня юридична конструкція права громадян на формування (участь) у формуванні (організації) судової влади. А тому з огляду на зазначене, з'ясовано поняття права народу на формування та реалізацію правосуддя через призму політичних прав, які є тим орієнтиром, що сприяє реалізації народовладдя. Для цього з'ясовано значення та сутність політичних прав, зокрема, права обирати владу та права брати участь в управлінні держави. Акцентовано увагу на тому, що Конституцією України проголошено основоположну засаду демократичної держави: «Носієм суверенітету і єдиним джерелом влади в Україні с народ». Цей принцип передбачає можливість народу самостійно формувати бачення свого майбутнього і майбутнього держави, визначати повноваження і склад органів державної влади, на які покладається реалізація очікувань народу, та контролювати їх діяльність складно. Встановлено, суспільство контролює функціонування суду не тільки через участь громадян у процесі судочинства в якості присяжних і народних засідателів, але і через механізми виборності суддів та відкликання їх з посади. Тобто через реалізацію права на формування судової влади та здійснення правосуддя. А тому з огляду на те, що формування народом судової гілки влади здійснюється шляхом виборів, вважаємо за необхідне для біль повного з'ясування змісту та виду функцій народовладдя в ході реалізації такого права, дослідити також функції виборів взагалі.

The main scientific achievements of foreign and domestic legal scholars in the field of research of the functions of rights in general are analyzed in order to reveal the concept of the functions of the people's right to the formation of justice and the mechanism of their implementation. It is pointed out that in the legal literature there is almost no legal construction of the right of citizens to form (participate) in the formation (organization) of the judiciary. Therefore, in view of the above, the concept of the right of the people to form and implement justice through the prism of political rights, which are the guideline that promotes the realization of democracy, has been clarified. This clarifies the meaning and essence of political rights, in particular, the right to elect power and the right to participate in government. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the Constitution of Ukraine proclaims the fundamental principle of a democratic state: "The bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in Ukraine is the people." This principle provides an opportunity for the people to independently form a vision of their future and the future of the state, to determine the powers and composition of public authorities, which are responsible for meeting the expectations of the people, and to control their activities is difficult. It is established that society controls the functioning of the court not only through the participation of citizens in the judicial process as jurors and lay judges, but also through the mechanisms of election of judges and their recall. That is, through the exercise of the right to form the judiciary and administer justice. Therefore, given that the formation of the judiciary by the people is carried out through elections, we consider it necessary to fully clarify the content and type of functions of democracy in the exercise of such a right, to explore the functions of elections in general. ; Проаналізовано основні наукові здобутки зарубіжних та вітчизняних вчених-юристів у сфері дослідження функцій прав взагалі для того, щоб розкрити поняття функцій права народу на формування здійснення правосуддя та механізму їх реалізації. Вказується, у юридичній літературі майже відсутня юридична конструкція права громадян на формування (участь) у формуванні (організації) судової влади. А тому з огляду на зазначене, з'ясовано поняття права народу на формування та реалізацію правосуддя через призму політичних прав, які є тим орієнтиром, що сприяє реалізації народовладдя. Для цього з'ясовано значення та сутність політичних прав, зокрема, права обирати владу та права брати участь в управлінні держави. Акцентовано увагу на тому, що Конституцією України проголошено основоположну засаду демократичної держави: «Носієм суверенітету і єдиним джерелом влади в Україні с народ». Цей принцип передбачає можливість народу самостійно формувати бачення свого майбутнього і майбутнього держави, визначати повноваження і склад органів державної влади, на які покладається реалізація очікувань народу, та контролювати їх діяльність складно. Встановлено, суспільство контролює функціонування суду не тільки через участь громадян у процесі судочинства в якості присяжних і народних засідателів, але і через механізми виборності суддів та відкликання їх з посади. Тобто через реалізацію права на формування судової влади та здійснення правосуддя. А тому з огляду на те, що формування народом судової гілки влади здійснюється шляхом виборів, вважаємо за необхідне для біль повного з'ясування змісту та виду функцій народовладдя в ході реалізації такого права, дослідити також функції виборів взагалі.