Suchergebnisse

Résumé L'objet de cette recherche est d'étudier les liens entre l'intelligence économique (IE) et la sauvegarde du Patrimoine Culturel Immatériel (PCI) au Burkina Faso, ce rapprochement peut être perçu comme contre-nature, voire illusoire ou même erroné. Pourtant, il s'agit d'un défi majeur qu'il faut relever à travers une coordination entre l'administration publique, les communautés et les acteurs privés. Afin de faire la lumière sur notre problématique, nous avons mobilisé le modèle de Daft and Weik. Notre positionnement épistémologique est de type interpretativiste, l'approche est qualitative avec un mode de raisonnement inductif, l'analyse empirique a été menée auprès des différents acteurs privés et publics. Le recours à une approche qualitative exploratoire s'explique par notre objectif qui vise l'exploration et la compréhension. Les résultats ont été analysés et interprétés par une analyse thématique à la main. Ils font apparaitre l'absence d'une coordination des politiques de sauvegarde du PCI. Ils montrent une certaine méconnaissance des pratiques de l'intelligence économique et montre également le besoin, en formation, des acteurs en matière des pratiques IE. Mots clés : Intelligence économique, culture, patrimoine culturel immatériel, Burkina Faso, sauvegarde. Abstract The purpose of this research is to study the links between economic intelligence (EI) and the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) in Burkina Faso, this connection can be perceived as unnatural, even illusory or even erroneous. However, this is a major challenge that must be addressed through coordination between public administration, communities and private actors. In order to shed light on our problem, we mobilized the model of Daft and Weik. Our epistemological positioning is interpretive, the approach is qualitative with an inductive reasoning mode, the empirical analysis was carried out with various private and public actors. The use of an exploratory qualitative approach is explained by our goal of exploration and ...

International audience ; Under the effect of major technological innovations and increased globalization of commercial exchanges since the end of the 1980s, numerous transformations are constantly affecting the cultural industries. It is in this context, where the logic of profit tends to be accentuated in cultural markets, that many sectors have sought to distinguish their products from those of the mass market. Although it covers quite different practices and representations according to the sectors concerned, the claim of independence emanates from bodies having in common to have renounced neither the audience nor the economic profitability. Starting with the case of the University of All Knowledge (Utls), this article is devoted to the stakes of independence in a sector that is generally little studied: that of scientific popularization. What are the issues of independence specific to an activity that has to adjust the content of science to the constraints of wider dissemination? The article shows that the Utls formula, as conceived by Yves Michaud, is based on the promotion of a quality science (renowned scientists, prestigious academic institutions, etc.) for which the required line is imperatively that of participation, accommodation or, failing that, indifference to the political and economic orders. From this point of view, it can be said that such an enterprise reflects a rather unprecedented synthesis of arrangements in which the signs of independence are established on multiple dependencies, by virtue of the entangled relationships between the state and the market that these new dominant fractions institute within the local, national and international spaces of power. ; Sous l'effet d'importantes innovations technologiques et d'une mondialisation accrue des échanges commerciaux depuis la fin des années 1980, de nombreuses transformations ne cessent d'affecter les industries culturelles. C'est dans ce contexte où les logiques du profit tendent à s'accentuer sur les marchés de la culture que de ...

International audience ; Under the effect of major technological innovations and increased globalization of commercial exchanges since the end of the 1980s, numerous transformations are constantly affecting the cultural industries. It is in this context, where the logic of profit tends to be accentuated in cultural markets, that many sectors have sought to distinguish their products from those of the mass market. Although it covers quite different practices and representations according to the sectors concerned, the claim of independence emanates from bodies having in common to have renounced neither the audience nor the economic profitability. Starting with the case of the University of All Knowledge (Utls), this article is devoted to the stakes of independence in a sector that is generally little studied: that of scientific popularization. What are the issues of independence specific to an activity that has to adjust the content of science to the constraints of wider dissemination? The article shows that the Utls formula, as conceived by Yves Michaud, is based on the promotion of a quality science (renowned scientists, prestigious academic institutions, etc.) for which the required line is imperatively that of participation, accommodation or, failing that, indifference to the political and economic orders. From this point of view, it can be said that such an enterprise reflects a rather unprecedented synthesis of arrangements in which the signs of independence are established on multiple dependencies, by virtue of the entangled relationships between the state and the market that these new dominant fractions institute within the local, national and international spaces of power. ; Sous l'effet d'importantes innovations technologiques et d'une mondialisation accrue des échanges commerciaux depuis la fin des années 1980, de nombreuses transformations ne cessent d'affecter les industries culturelles. C'est dans ce contexte où les logiques du profit tendent à s'accentuer sur les marchés de la culture que de ...

International audience ; Under the effect of major technological innovations and increased globalization of commercial exchanges since the end of the 1980s, numerous transformations are constantly affecting the cultural industries. It is in this context, where the logic of profit tends to be accentuated in cultural markets, that many sectors have sought to distinguish their products from those of the mass market. Although it covers quite different practices and representations according to the sectors concerned, the claim of independence emanates from bodies having in common to have renounced neither the audience nor the economic profitability. Starting with the case of the University of All Knowledge (Utls), this article is devoted to the stakes of independence in a sector that is generally little studied: that of scientific popularization. What are the issues of independence specific to an activity that has to adjust the content of science to the constraints of wider dissemination? The article shows that the Utls formula, as conceived by Yves Michaud, is based on the promotion of a quality science (renowned scientists, prestigious academic institutions, etc.) for which the required line is imperatively that of participation, accommodation or, failing that, indifference to the political and economic orders. From this point of view, it can be said that such an enterprise reflects a rather unprecedented synthesis of arrangements in which the signs of independence are established on multiple dependencies, by virtue of the entangled relationships between the state and the market that these new dominant fractions institute within the local, national and international spaces of power. ; Sous l'effet d'importantes innovations technologiques et d'une mondialisation accrue des échanges commerciaux depuis la fin des années 1980, de nombreuses transformations ne cessent d'affecter les industries culturelles. C'est dans ce contexte où les logiques du profit tendent à s'accentuer sur les marchés de la culture que de nombreuses filières ont cherché à démarquer leurs produits de ceux qui se rattachent au pôle de la grande diffusion. Bien qu'elle recouvre des pratiques et des représentations assez différentes suivant les secteurs concernés, la revendication d'indépendance émane d'instances ayant en commun de n'avoir renoncé ni à l'audience ni à la rentabilité économique. À partir du cas de l'Université de tous les savoirs (Utls), cet article est consacré aux enjeux de l'indépendance s'agissant d'un secteur généralement peu étudié : celui de la vulgarisation scientifique. Qu'en est- il en effet des enjeux de l'indépendance propres à une activité ayant à ajuster le contenu de la science aux contraintes de la diffusion élargie ? L'article montre ainsi que la formule de l'Utls, telle que l'a conçue Yves Michaud, est fondée sur la mise en avant d'une science de qualité (personnalités scientifiques de renom, institutions académiques prestigieuses, etc.) pour laquelle la ligne exigée est impérativement celle de la participation, de l'accommodement ou, à défaut, de l'indifférence aux ordres politique et économique. De ce point de vue, on peut dire qu'une telle entreprise reflète une synthèse plutôt inédite de dispositifs où les signes de l'indépendance s'établissent sur des dépendances multiples, en vertu des rapports d'intrication entre l'État et le marché qu'instituent ces nouvelles fractions dominantes au sein des espaces locaux, nationaux et internationaux du pouvoir.

Examines role and function of and challenges facing intelligence services in the post-cold war world, with emphasis on France. Geopolitical, economic, and cultural aspects, the technology and information revolutions, and other issues.

Au lendemain de la chute de l'Union soviétique, la Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) a pris une initiative d'ouverture, en apparente contradiction avec les us et coutumes d'une agence de renseignement. Au terme de près d'un demi-siècle d'opérations secrètes et de scandales, cette démarche devait permettre de redorer l'image de la communauté du renseignement afin de pouvoir résister aux conséquences potentiellement funestes de la disparition de sa cible originelle. Si la mise en œuvre de ce projet a révélé les difficultés induites par une révolution culturelle de ce type, la CIA est néanmoins parvenue à créer une dynamique favorable à la déclassification de documents d'archive qui a bénéficié à la communauté scientifique. Mais en accroissant la visibilité du renseignement, cette initiative a également servi son instrumentalisation à des fins politiques. ; After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) launched an openness initiative that seemed to contradict the longstanding traditions of intelligence agencies. After almost half a century of secrecy and scandals, this initiative was supposed to rehabilitate the tarnished image of the intelli- gence community and help to keep it afloat despite the potentially disastrous consequences of the disappearance of its initial target. Although the plan's implementation revealed all the difficulties involved in a cultural revolution of this type, the CIA nevertheless succeeded in creating a favourable climate for document declassification that benefited the scientific community. But by increasing the visibility of intelligence gathering, this initiative also contributed to its instrumentalisation for political ends.

Economic intelligence presents methods to discover contemporary challenges. Abundant incomprehension, mostly cultural, has hampered its development in France: we were unable to timely seize the opportunities offered after the Cold War. Since 2003, the tendency is reversed: a majority of our compatriots has realized the failure of an outdated economic and social model. The creation of the Fédération des professionals de l'Intelligence économique (Fépic) (federation of professionals of economic intelligence) is based on specific experiences of economic intelligence and on added value generated to profit all economic actors.

The question here is to see how the concept of territorial intelligence may change in light of ideas put into practice in recent years by international organizations, and now constantly evolving by their application in various European or global territorialisation processes (social and economic, environmental, strategic, virtual, etc.). These new fundamental concepts are recognized in common by the Council of Europe, the United Nations and UNESCO in the writing of Conventions or common Directives, and in territorialisation processes : − based on territorial economic intelligence, first example, by putting the economy of the territories into networks by putting forward the concept of "Global Public Good" (UN/UNDP) that gives priority to "Global Public Goods" according to the Millennium Development Objectives (MDO) - a United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), priorities to fighting poverty and famine or fighting inequalities of sex and resources, priorities to education, health networks, priorities to environmental preservation, employment, equitable trade, democratic governance, etc. − or based on strategic intelligence, second example, in management and prevention of conflicts in Europe, by putting forward the concept of "cultural democracy" that maintains the cultural diversity of the populations, the intercultural and inter-religious dialogue, according to the principles of the European Council. These concepts impact territorial development, in particular the Regions. These recent ideas provide a common basis for thought on a new concept of territorial intelligence for which we will try to give a definition, a concept already entered into application by the Regions of Europe and the world through reinforcement of their ties with the UN/UNDP since 2007. Territorial intelligence is analyzed in light of the four founding principles of the Council of Europe (the Great Europe of 47 member States), which are the Human Rights (concept of Global Public Good) and democracy (Democratic Governance) ; social cohesion ...

A New Strategy for Intelligence ?, by Pierre Lacoste
Intelligence is at the heart of the cultural revolution that is shaking the world in transition between the pseudo-balances of bipolarity and the as yet-uncertain structures that will prevail in the 21st century. But the legacy of the Cold War is causing problems everywhere. Most States are wondering how the secret services will develop and about new ways of managing them. The United States, strengthened by its victory over the Soviet Union, is vigorously pursuing a policy aimed at reinforcing its position of hegemony. That country is demonstrating a first application of what could be called the « new era of intelligence ». But intelligence strategies have to be seen in a new context : that of the « two worlds ». One — official — world is that of sovereign States ; the other is that of recognized or clandestine multinational organizations whose intentions are often licit but sometimes criminal. Now intelligence must remain an exclusive power of states based on the rule of law, serving their national interests.

International audience ; When reading history, the need for and rise in power of specific competencies for project management and implementation is at the heart of territorial engineering. An example from France is the hybridization of knowledge and skills of the local development organizations with those of the public territorial action managers in an intercommunal association. The competencies involved in and built by territorial engineering are the following: * The ability to mobilize resources and networks to obtain physical and intangible resources; * The ability to create links and foster stakeholder networks; * The ability to help stakeholders co-construct initiatives and to coordinate them within the project dynamic. In this virtuous vision of territorial engineering competencies, the collective competence is outlined and stakeholders could--and should?--be using it to create and implement projects and territories. Does it consist of territorial intelligence or collective competency? And what place does engineering have? It is through these questions at the heart of creating a territory, where technical, political, and citizen spheres must be synergized, that the processes of interaction and collective reflection on the part of the stakeholders reside. Monts d'Ardèche and Vercors are among the many places where ideas, knowledge and skills are shared to create cultural and economic change based on the territorial characteristics of the products--chestnuts and Bleu du Vercors--and their collective appropriation by the stakeholders. Making engineering a stakeholder in territory-building raises the questions of how it can contribute to the capacity of local stakeholders to decide and to act both wisely and with full information. Our research does not define territorial engineering, but instead indicates models to be built in order to accompany the desired methods of change. ; A la lecture de l'histoire, le besoin et la montée en puissance de compétences spécifiques à la gestion ou la mise en œuvre de projets ...

International audience ; When reading history, the need for and rise in power of specific competencies for project management and implementation is at the heart of territorial engineering. An example from France is the hybridization of knowledge and skills of the local development organizations with those of the public territorial action managers in an intercommunal association. The competencies involved in and built by territorial engineering are the following: * The ability to mobilize resources and networks to obtain physical and intangible resources; * The ability to create links and foster stakeholder networks; * The ability to help stakeholders co-construct initiatives and to coordinate them within the project dynamic. In this virtuous vision of territorial engineering competencies, the collective competence is outlined and stakeholders could--and should?--be using it to create and implement projects and territories. Does it consist of territorial intelligence or collective competency? And what place does engineering have? It is through these questions at the heart of creating a territory, where technical, political, and citizen spheres must be synergized, that the processes of interaction and collective reflection on the part of the stakeholders reside. Monts d'Ardèche and Vercors are among the many places where ideas, knowledge and skills are shared to create cultural and economic change based on the territorial characteristics of the products--chestnuts and Bleu du Vercors--and their collective appropriation by the stakeholders. Making engineering a stakeholder in territory-building raises the questions of how it can contribute to the capacity of local stakeholders to decide and to act both wisely and with full information. Our research does not define territorial engineering, but instead indicates models to be built in order to accompany the desired methods of change. ; A la lecture de l'histoire, le besoin et la montée en puissance de compétences spécifiques à la gestion ou la mise en œuvre de projets ...

International audience ; When reading history, the need for and rise in power of specific competencies for project management and implementation is at the heart of territorial engineering. An example from France is the hybridization of knowledge and skills of the local development organizations with those of the public territorial action managers in an intercommunal association. The competencies involved in and built by territorial engineering are the following: * The ability to mobilize resources and networks to obtain physical and intangible resources; * The ability to create links and foster stakeholder networks; * The ability to help stakeholders co-construct initiatives and to coordinate them within the project dynamic. In this virtuous vision of territorial engineering competencies, the collective competence is outlined and stakeholders could--and should?--be using it to create and implement projects and territories. Does it consist of territorial intelligence or collective competency? And what place does engineering have? It is through these questions at the heart of creating a territory, where technical, political, and citizen spheres must be synergized, that the processes of interaction and collective reflection on the part of the stakeholders reside. Monts d'Ardèche and Vercors are among the many places where ideas, knowledge and skills are shared to create cultural and economic change based on the territorial characteristics of the products--chestnuts and Bleu du Vercors--and their collective appropriation by the stakeholders. Making engineering a stakeholder in territory-building raises the questions of how it can contribute to the capacity of local stakeholders to decide and to act both wisely and with full information. Our research does not define territorial engineering, but instead indicates models to be built in order to accompany the desired methods of change. ; A la lecture de l'histoire, le besoin et la montée en puissance de compétences spécifiques à la gestion ou la mise en œuvre de projets ...

International audience ; When reading history, the need for and rise in power of specific competencies for project management and implementation is at the heart of territorial engineering. An example from France is the hybridization of knowledge and skills of the local development organizations with those of the public territorial action managers in an intercommunal association. The competencies involved in and built by territorial engineering are the following: * The ability to mobilize resources and networks to obtain physical and intangible resources; * The ability to create links and foster stakeholder networks; * The ability to help stakeholders co-construct initiatives and to coordinate them within the project dynamic. In this virtuous vision of territorial engineering competencies, the collective competence is outlined and stakeholders could--and should?--be using it to create and implement projects and territories. Does it consist of territorial intelligence or collective competency? And what place does engineering have? It is through these questions at the heart of creating a territory, where technical, political, and citizen spheres must be synergized, that the processes of interaction and collective reflection on the part of the stakeholders reside. Monts d'Ardèche and Vercors are among the many places where ideas, knowledge and skills are shared to create cultural and economic change based on the territorial characteristics of the products--chestnuts and Bleu du Vercors--and their collective appropriation by the stakeholders. Making engineering a stakeholder in territory-building raises the questions of how it can contribute to the capacity of local stakeholders to decide and to act both wisely and with full information. Our research does not define territorial engineering, but instead indicates models to be built in order to accompany the desired methods of change. ; A la lecture de l'histoire, le besoin et la montée en puissance de compétences spécifiques à la gestion ou la mise en œuvre de projets ...