Suchergebnisse

Front Cover -- Title Page -- Half Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Foreword -- Acknowledgments -- Note on Transliteration -- Introduction -- Part I: Soviet Defectors in the Public Record -- 1. What Has Been Written About Soviet Defectors? -- 2. What Have Defectors Written About Themselves? -- 3. What Did Soviet Defectors Say? -- Part II: The KGB Wanted List: 1945-1969 -- 4. The KGB Wanted List: A General Characterization -- 5. Personal Data on Defectors -- 6. Defection and Its Aftermath -- 7. Criminal Allegations and Expected Punishment -- 8. Spy and Fake Defectors -- 9. Defections Before and After the Berlin Wall -- 10. Defections Under Stalin, Khrushchev, and Brezhnev -- Part III: Defections From 1969 to the Present -- 11. Defection and Legal Emigration -- 12. Trends in Post -1969 Defection -- 13. Defection and Détente -- Conclusion -- Appendixes -- List of Abbreviations Used in Appendixes -- 1A Passev List (May 1945-April 1969) -- IB Those Missing From the Passev List (1945- 1969) -- 2A Sample Entry of the KGB Wanted List (Vladislav Krasnov) -- 2B Ethnic Background of Defectors -- 2C Annual Distribution of Defections -- 2D Countries of Defection -- 2E Countries of Residence -- 2F Court Sentences For Defectors -- 2G List of "Anti-Soviet" Organizations Associated With Defectors -- 2H List of "Anti-Soviet" Organizations Sponsored By Foreigners -- 2I Defections Before and After the Berlin Wall -- 2J Defections Under Stalin, Khrushchev, and Brezhnev -- 2K Ethnic Distribution of Defectors Under Different Rulers -- 3 Composite List of Defectors (May 1969 to Present) -- 3A Defecting Scholars and Intellectuals (1969 to Present) -- 3B Defecting Musicians and Singers (1969 to Present) -- 3C Defecting Dancers (1969 to Present) -- 3D Defecting Seamen and Fishermen (1969 to Present) -- 3E Defecting Athletes and Sportsmen (1969 To Present)

Standard prisoners' dilemma games offer players the binary choice between cooperating and defecting, but in a related game there is the third possibility of leaving the game altogether. We conceptualize exiting as taking the individual beyond the reach of externalities generated in the original group, and on that basis—together with the assumption of self-interested (dollar-maximizing) behavior on the part of all players—we derive the prediction that the exit option will drain the community or group more of cooperators than of defectors.But experimental data do not support this prediction; cooperators do not leave more frequently than defectors and, in fact, there is evidence that defectors are more prone to leave than cooperators. We consider and reject the possibility that this failure of prediction results from the (admitted) greater optimism of cooperators about the incidence of cooperation "here," and present data supporting the hypothesis that cooperators often stay when their personal interest is with exiting because of the same ethical or group-regarding impulse that (presumably) led them to cooperate in the first place. Cooperation can be produced for a group or community either by inducing people to cooperate or by inducing those who are going to cooperate to stay in the game, and ethical considerations seem to underlie the decision to stay as well as the decision to cooperate while staying.

The number of North Koreans defecting to South Korea is increasing rapidly. They are important people to South Korean society not only for humanitarian reasons, but also for their impact on the future Korean unification and the integration of the two different South and North Korean peoples. However, the defectors have experienced many difficulties in their adaptation to South Korean society due to their own characteristics and due to the misunderstandings of the South Korean people. To obtain comprehensive qualitative data about the characteristics and difficulties of North Korean defectors' adaptation to South Korean society, 58 semi-structured in-depth interviews were performed with 32 defectors who had entered South Korea from 1990 to 1997. Four categories of adaptation difficulties were encountered, which are related with the defectors' suspiciousness, different ways of thinking, searching for new sets of values, and with the prejudice of the South Korean people. Finally, three areas of suggestions for the more successful adaptation of the defectors to South Korean society were made; a need for more comprehensive perspectives on the defectors' adaptation, suggestions regarding educational programs and suggestions for educating the South Korean people. ; open

Introduction -- From Linked to Linking Agency: Transnational Ties of North Korean Defectors Living in Japan -- Adaptation of North Korean Defector Families Who Resettled in South Korea After Having Left the South -- 'I Opened My Eyes': Female North Korean Defectors' Journey from Precarity to Empowerment -- Do They Get Along? Interactions Between North Korean Defectors and South Korean Migrants in London -- Communication of North Korean Defector Families through Transnational Migration -- De-bordering North Korea: Remittances and Global Networks -- Representation and Self-Presentation of North Korean Defectors in South Korea: Image, Discourse, and Voices -- North Korean Nation-Building Outside North Korea -- Conclusion: Looking to the Future.