Suchergebnisse

Research object – creativity education in physical education lessons. Hypotheses: 1. Students and teachers opinion about to creativity education about physical education lessons is different. 2. Girls and boys attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons are different. Research target – find out teachers and students attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons. Research objectives: 1. Analyze scientific literature and discuss the concept of creativity, factors influencing and inhibit creativity and creativity in education physical education classes. 2. To determine student"s approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 3. Compare girls and boys attitude about creativity education. 7 4. Compare the IX – X and XI – XII classes" students approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 5. Set the physical education teacher's approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 6. Comparison of physical culture teachers' and students' attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons. Conclusions: 1. Consensus in the scientific literature on the concept of creativity is not, but in my opinion, this is a person's ability to solve tasks and issues an original, flexible and efficient. Creativity leads to inheritance, environmental influences, and both factors together. Creativity inhibits criticism, evaluation and personal growth unfavorable political system. Only a creative teacher can develop creative personalities. Therefore, modern physical education lesson the teacher must ensure creativity, critical thinking, the ability to work in a group. 2. 74, 9% of the students ' point of view (p. < 0, 05), creativity is innate and partly a desire to grow as students. Many students refer desire to improve for a creative personality, which is manifested through the originality. Teachers more favorably assesses the student's ability to adapt to one another and create a task for ...

Research object – creativity education in physical education lessons. Hypotheses: 1. Students and teachers opinion about to creativity education about physical education lessons is different. 2. Girls and boys attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons are different. Research target – find out teachers and students attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons. Research objectives: 1. Analyze scientific literature and discuss the concept of creativity, factors influencing and inhibit creativity and creativity in education physical education classes. 2. To determine student"s approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 3. Compare girls and boys attitude about creativity education. 7 4. Compare the IX – X and XI – XII classes" students approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 5. Set the physical education teacher's approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 6. Comparison of physical culture teachers' and students' attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons. Conclusions: 1. Consensus in the scientific literature on the concept of creativity is not, but in my opinion, this is a person's ability to solve tasks and issues an original, flexible and efficient. Creativity leads to inheritance, environmental influences, and both factors together. Creativity inhibits criticism, evaluation and personal growth unfavorable political system. Only a creative teacher can develop creative personalities. Therefore, modern physical education lesson the teacher must ensure creativity, critical thinking, the ability to work in a group. 2. 74, 9% of the students ' point of view (p. < 0, 05), creativity is innate and partly a desire to grow as students. Many students refer desire to improve for a creative personality, which is manifested through the originality. Teachers more favorably assesses the student's ability to adapt to one another and create a task for something new, but in psychical education classes" creativity educating tasks are assigned rarely. Creativity is educated only partially because of the development of physical education teacher is a partially creative. 3. The analysis of questionnaire data, disaggregated by sex, it should be noted that even a significant disagreed when p<0.05, so all this data confirm a second hypothesis that boys and girls differ in opinion on the creativity education and its" development through psychical education lessons. 4. Taking into account the classes have not received significant difference that creativity is innate or the result of education. In all other aspects of the students' approach to creativity education in accordance with the classes differed significantly (p < 0, 05). 5. 79,5% of teachers think that creativity is innate and partly educated. Most of the teachers described themselves as a likeness of new impressions, although in physical education classes creativity developing tasks are rare and the educates creativity only in part. In terms of teachers, students" lack of initiative prevents them from being creative in physical education classes. In teachers" point of view, for physical education lesson to be more creative, students lack of self-expression. 6. 56,4% of teachers believe (p< 0,05), that creativity leads to an environment in which student grow, where family, friends, teachers are and the creativity development is engaging in an activity that can be suppressed by the authoritarian relationships, strict discipline, and the negative 8 reaction of the teacher. Pupils in terms of criticism. (47.6 percent) creativity is determined by the environment in which the student grow, where family, friends, teachers are and creativity education condition is freedom of expression, which is not suppressed by authoritarian relationships, strict discipline, and the negative reaction of the teacher and criticism. Teachers and students think different what could make the psychical education lessons more creative. So while students and teachers aims in physical education lessons are quite similar, but their views on this issue are different, and this confirms the first raised hypothesis.

Research object – creativity education in physical education lessons. Hypotheses: 1. Students and teachers opinion about to creativity education about physical education lessons is different. 2. Girls and boys attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons are different. Research target – find out teachers and students attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons. Research objectives: 1. Analyze scientific literature and discuss the concept of creativity, factors influencing and inhibit creativity and creativity in education physical education classes. 2. To determine student"s approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 3. Compare girls and boys attitude about creativity education. 7 4. Compare the IX – X and XI – XII classes" students approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 5. Set the physical education teacher's approach to creativity education during physical education lessons. 6. Comparison of physical culture teachers' and students' attitudes towards the education of creativity in physical education lessons. Conclusions: 1. Consensus in the scientific literature on the concept of creativity is not, but in my opinion, this is a person's ability to solve tasks and issues an original, flexible and efficient. Creativity leads to inheritance, environmental influences, and both factors together. Creativity inhibits criticism, evaluation and personal growth unfavorable political system. Only a creative teacher can develop creative personalities. Therefore, modern physical education lesson the teacher must ensure creativity, critical thinking, the ability to work in a group. 2. 74, 9% of the students ' point of view (p. < 0, 05), creativity is innate and partly a desire to grow as students. Many students refer desire to improve for a creative personality, which is manifested through the originality. Teachers more favorably assesses the student's ability to adapt to one another and create a task for something new, but in psychical education classes" creativity educating tasks are assigned rarely. Creativity is educated only partially because of the development of physical education teacher is a partially creative. 3. The analysis of questionnaire data, disaggregated by sex, it should be noted that even a significant disagreed when p<0.05, so all this data confirm a second hypothesis that boys and girls differ in opinion on the creativity education and its" development through psychical education lessons. 4. Taking into account the classes have not received significant difference that creativity is innate or the result of education. In all other aspects of the students' approach to creativity education in accordance with the classes differed significantly (p < 0, 05). 5. 79,5% of teachers think that creativity is innate and partly educated. Most of the teachers described themselves as a likeness of new impressions, although in physical education classes creativity developing tasks are rare and the educates creativity only in part. In terms of teachers, students" lack of initiative prevents them from being creative in physical education classes. In teachers" point of view, for physical education lesson to be more creative, students lack of self-expression. 6. 56,4% of teachers believe (p< 0,05), that creativity leads to an environment in which student grow, where family, friends, teachers are and the creativity development is engaging in an activity that can be suppressed by the authoritarian relationships, strict discipline, and the negative 8 reaction of the teacher. Pupils in terms of criticism. (47.6 percent) creativity is determined by the environment in which the student grow, where family, friends, teachers are and creativity education condition is freedom of expression, which is not suppressed by authoritarian relationships, strict discipline, and the negative reaction of the teacher and criticism. Teachers and students think different what could make the psychical education lessons more creative. So while students and teachers aims in physical education lessons are quite similar, but their views on this issue are different, and this confirms the first raised hypothesis.

The article seeks to develop the concept of social competence in higher education based not only on theoretical background but also on the reflections of social competence in European Union (EU) and national (in this case – Lithuanian) regulations of higher education. Theoretical analysis revealed that social competence as a concept has many definitions. As a result it was recognized that the set of skills defining social competence differs depending on the context where they are exploredand the particular components of the social competence in education are revealed. They served as the base to identify how social competence reveals itself in higher education. In order to carry out this task the empirical research – relevant document analysis was performed.

The article seeks to develop the concept of social competence in higher education based not only on theoretical background but also on the reflections of social competence in European Union (EU) and national (in this case – Lithuanian) regulations of higher education. Theoretical analysis revealed that social competence as a concept has many definitions. As a result it was recognized that the set of skills defining social competence differs depending on the context where they are exploredand the particular components of the social competence in education are revealed. They served as the base to identify how social competence reveals itself in higher education. In order to carry out this task the empirical research – relevant document analysis was performed.

The article seeks to develop the concept of social competence in higher education based not only on theoretical background but also on the reflections of social competence in European Union (EU) and national (in this case – Lithuanian) regulations of higher education. Theoretical analysis revealed that social competence as a concept has many definitions. As a result it was recognized that the set of skills defining social competence differs depending on the context where they are exploredand the particular components of the social competence in education are revealed. They served as the base to identify how social competence reveals itself in higher education. In order to carry out this task the empirical research – relevant document analysis was performed.

The European Union considers lifelong learning one of the means that helps achieve social cohesion and competitiveness in modern society and the world economy. The European Union has tried to achieve the goal of12,5 % of people aged 25-64 to pursue a secondary educaiton; however, this indicator has not been reached. Comparing with other European countries, the level of lifelong learning among Lithuanians at the age of 20-64 is low, although starting from the year 2003 it was growing and in 2011 it reached 5,9 %. The aim of adults to a get secondary education is stimulated not only by growing requirements of labour market but also by social and psychological factors. A successful return on the education system and a completed secondary education can open doors to further aims – to formal and informal education and the development of a person's self-confidence. The indicators of the acquisition of secondary education show that the number of youth at the age of 18-24 who received a secondary education is increasing in Lithuania; however, the indicator for further learning after receiving a secondary education is decreasing. [.]

The European Union considers lifelong learning one of the means that helps achieve social cohesion and competitiveness in modern society and the world economy. The European Union has tried to achieve the goal of12,5 % of people aged 25-64 to pursue a secondary educaiton; however, this indicator has not been reached. Comparing with other European countries, the level of lifelong learning among Lithuanians at the age of 20-64 is low, although starting from the year 2003 it was growing and in 2011 it reached 5,9 %. The aim of adults to a get secondary education is stimulated not only by growing requirements of labour market but also by social and psychological factors. A successful return on the education system and a completed secondary education can open doors to further aims – to formal and informal education and the development of a person's self-confidence. The indicators of the acquisition of secondary education show that the number of youth at the age of 18-24 who received a secondary education is increasing in Lithuania; however, the indicator for further learning after receiving a secondary education is decreasing. [.]

In scientific literature, it is agreed, that the progress and development of modern economy depends on a number of entrepreneurs and their abilities, therefore a question of individual education of entrepreneurship is becoming more and more relevant. Firstly, entrepreneurship is associated with the origin of an individual, small and medium-sized enterprise. In rapidly changing economic environment, entrepreneurship as a way of economic activity, including even large organizations with stable resources, becomes important in all areas. In modern society, the importance of individual entrepreneurship's impact in economic, social, psychological processes of development is increasing. The individual entrepreneurship helps to understand and perceive new opportunities of business development and contributes to the public welfare. In whole European Union, the entrepreneurship is perceived as a priority factor for the development of countries. Moreover, its education can form conditions for the enterpriselevel, especially when the entrepreneurship is developed systematically. However, according to the report of the state control's state audit "The development of innovations in Lithuania" (2008), it is emphasized that "country's system of science and education is not focused on the education of entrepreneurship and the development of innovation." The lack of systematic approach to education of entrepreneurship becomes relevant scientific problem. [.]

In scientific literature, it is agreed, that the progress and development of modern economy depends on a number of entrepreneurs and their abilities, therefore a question of individual education of entrepreneurship is becoming more and more relevant. Firstly, entrepreneurship is associated with the origin of an individual, small and medium-sized enterprise. In rapidly changing economic environment, entrepreneurship as a way of economic activity, including even large organizations with stable resources, becomes important in all areas. In modern society, the importance of individual entrepreneurship's impact in economic, social, psychological processes of development is increasing. The individual entrepreneurship helps to understand and perceive new opportunities of business development and contributes to the public welfare. In whole European Union, the entrepreneurship is perceived as a priority factor for the development of countries. Moreover, its education can form conditions for the enterpriselevel, especially when the entrepreneurship is developed systematically. However, according to the report of the state control's state audit "The development of innovations in Lithuania" (2008), it is emphasized that "country's system of science and education is not focused on the education of entrepreneurship and the development of innovation." The lack of systematic approach to education of entrepreneurship becomes relevant scientific problem. [.]

In scientific literature, it is agreed, that the progress and development of modern economy depends on a number of entrepreneurs and their abilities, therefore a question of individual education of entrepreneurship is becoming more and more relevant. Firstly, entrepreneurship is associated with the origin of an individual, small and medium-sized enterprise. In rapidly changing economic environment, entrepreneurship as a way of economic activity, including even large organizations with stable resources, becomes important in all areas. In modern society, the importance of individual entrepreneurship's impact in economic, social, psychological processes of development is increasing. The individual entrepreneurship helps to understand and perceive new opportunities of business development and contributes to the public welfare. In whole European Union, the entrepreneurship is perceived as a priority factor for the development of countries. Moreover, its education can form conditions for the enterpriselevel, especially when the entrepreneurship is developed systematically. However, according to the report of the state control's state audit "The development of innovations in Lithuania" (2008), it is emphasized that "country's system of science and education is not focused on the education of entrepreneurship and the development of innovation." The lack of systematic approach to education of entrepreneurship becomes relevant scientific problem. [.]

In scientific literature, it is agreed, that the progress and development of modern economy depends on a number of entrepreneurs and their abilities, therefore a question of individual education of entrepreneurship is becoming more and more relevant. Firstly, entrepreneurship is associated with the origin of an individual, small and medium-sized enterprise. In rapidly changing economic environment, entrepreneurship as a way of economic activity, including even large organizations with stable resources, becomes important in all areas. In modern society, the importance of individual entrepreneurship's impact in economic, social, psychological processes of development is increasing. The individual entrepreneurship helps to understand and perceive new opportunities of business development and contributes to the public welfare. In whole European Union, the entrepreneurship is perceived as a priority factor for the development of countries. Moreover, its education can form conditions for the enterpriselevel, especially when the entrepreneurship is developed systematically. However, according to the report of the state control's state audit "The development of innovations in Lithuania" (2008), it is emphasized that "country's system of science and education is not focused on the education of entrepreneurship and the development of innovation." The lack of systematic approach to education of entrepreneurship becomes relevant scientific problem. [.]

Scientific literature generally identifies factors that influence social change and the accessibility to education: physical, political, economical and cultural fields. It is logical that the discussed political, economical and social field changes and power distribution in social space had direct effect on the structuring of society, the institution of education and the accessibility to education. However, it must be noted that the transformation of the institution of education cannot replace economical and political reforms, above all, it becomes a catalyst and the object of power and influence distribution. The exclusive focus on social, economic, educational opportunities and the great influence of the mentioned fields on the institution of education consolidate the pragmatic, instrumental concept of education, overshadow specific personality-linked and its power development-related aims of education, devalue the significance of personality and humanistic and cultural outlines within the theoretical reflection on education and its practice.

Scientific literature generally identifies factors that influence social change and the accessibility to education: physical, political, economical and cultural fields. It is logical that the discussed political, economical and social field changes and power distribution in social space had direct effect on the structuring of society, the institution of education and the accessibility to education. However, it must be noted that the transformation of the institution of education cannot replace economical and political reforms, above all, it becomes a catalyst and the object of power and influence distribution. The exclusive focus on social, economic, educational opportunities and the great influence of the mentioned fields on the institution of education consolidate the pragmatic, instrumental concept of education, overshadow specific personality-linked and its power development-related aims of education, devalue the significance of personality and humanistic and cultural outlines within the theoretical reflection on education and its practice.

Scientific literature generally identifies factors that influence social change and the accessibility to education: physical, political, economical and cultural fields. It is logical that the discussed political, economical and social field changes and power distribution in social space had direct effect on the structuring of society, the institution of education and the accessibility to education. However, it must be noted that the transformation of the institution of education cannot replace economical and political reforms, above all, it becomes a catalyst and the object of power and influence distribution. The exclusive focus on social, economic, educational opportunities and the great influence of the mentioned fields on the institution of education consolidate the pragmatic, instrumental concept of education, overshadow specific personality-linked and its power development-related aims of education, devalue the significance of personality and humanistic and cultural outlines within the theoretical reflection on education and its practice.