Suchergebnisse

Ethnic conflicts, self-determination movements, economic assistance, and democratic transition in the post-cold war era; Eritrea, Somalia, Ethiopia, and Djibouti; 6 articles.

This paper aims to re-read Roman-Barbarian ethnicity as a cultural construct not least based on Biblical models viewed and interpreted as founded as well as authoritative instruments of self-definition. The study intends to overturn the traditional historiographical paradigm, according to which ethnicity emerges as a purely "Barbaric" construction in opposition to the Christian-Roman universalism. Starting from such a model, European history was often represented as a conflict between universalistic and nationalistic issues. According to A.'s analysis, the political role of ethnicity in Latin Europe doesn't emerge, at least partially, as a Barbarian "import". Far from representing an antithesis to the Universal Church, ethnicity assumes its politic role through Christianity and, more specifically, on the basis of exegesis as well as of re-adaptation of ethnic self-definitions well attested in Biblical texts. ; Il contributo rilegge l'etnicità romano-barbarica come costruzione culturale fondata in parte sulla rilettura e sulla riappropriazione di modelli biblici intesi come strumenti fondanti e autorevoli. Lo studio tenta di capovolgere il paradigma tradizionale secondo cui l'etnicità sarebbe un portato prettamente "barbarico", in opposizione all'universalismo cristiano-romano. Seguendo questo modello, la storia europea è spesso stata rappresentata come un conflitto tra principi universali e nazionali. Secondo l'A. il ruolo politico dell'etnicità nell'Europa latina non va considerato, almeno in una certa misura, come un'importazione barbarica. Lungi dal rappresentare un'antitesi alla chiesa universale, l'etnicità assume il suo ruolo politico decisivo proprio attraverso il cristianesimo e, più in particolare, attraverso la ripresa e l'adattamento di taluni modelli di auto-definizione etnica presenti nei testi biblici.

This work examines the political legacy of colonialism in Kenya and the knock-on effect this has had on the current crisis of citizenship in Kenya. In colonial times, the British introduced indirect rule through the Provincial Administration, a hierarchical structure that imposed upon the urban and rural populace two distinct forms of political and legal identities: that of citizens and that of natives. In the rural areas, natives were governed according to "customary law" (which the colonisers called "tribal tradition"). This paper concentrates on this sphere of the colonial State because its consequences can still be felt today in rural areas -- in particular in terms of the recurrent violence resulting from a crisis of citizenship. In rural provinces, land represents the main source of income and means of survival. Land was managed by the Provincial Administration according to the logic of colonial power and, of course, to its benefit. During decolonisation and after independence, the same logic was applied by the African elites. An analysis of how Britain and post-colonial governments have ruled Kenya shows the need for a radical change in the approach originally adopted by the Provincial Administration. The European colonial outlook underpinning this approach is outmoded and dangerous as it fans the flames of contemporary social violence, which the media often characterises over-simplistically as ethnic conflict. Adapted from the source document.