Europe Othered, Europe Enlisted, Europe Possessed
In: European Stories, S. 183-202
3795 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European Stories, S. 183-202
In: The Balkan prism: a retrospective by policy-makers and analysts, S. 199-213
In: Anti-Money Laundering: International Law and Practice, S. 319-320
In: Community Policing in Indigenous Communities, S. 229-230
In: Contemporary Security Studies; Security Strategies and American World Order
In: Regional Guide to International Conflict and Management from 1945 to 2003, S. 229-257
In: The Political Thought of the Conservative Party since 1945, S. 113-132
In: Terrorism and the International Legal Order, S. 395-432
In: Geopolitics and Expertise, S. 12-31
In: Elections in Europe: a data handbook, S. 69-124
"The main purpose of this introductory chapter is to give an initial systematic overview of the information that is treated in the individual country studies. The authors do not attempt to anticipate the exhaustive comparative analysis now made possible by the free availability of relevant historical data on elections and electoral systems in Europe. In contrast to many publications on European elections and parties, where the East and the West are treated separately, and small and so-called micro states are often ignored, Elections in Europe comprise all European countries, from Albania to Vatican City, irrespective of their individual size, in alphabetical order. They do not deny that a grouping of 45 European states would have made sense. Among comparative scholars, a subregional approach is widespread. For example, Southern European countries are regularly treated as a distinct group-or area with common features; the same goes for the Central and Eastern European countries. Especially for comparative research, political scientists would certainly find some more criteria to systematize the large set of countries: regime type (authoritarian, democratic), state structure (centralist, federalist), form of government (parliamentarism, presidentialism), type of democracy (majoritarian, consensus), level of development (agrarian, industrialist), etc. For systematic reasons, the authors preferred an alphabetical order." (excerpt)
In: Regionalism and World Order, S. 55-91