New Perspectives on European Union Development Cooperation
In: International affairs, Band 76, Heft 3, S. 671-672
ISSN: 0020-5850
In: International affairs, Band 76, Heft 3, S. 671-672
ISSN: 0020-5850
In: Development Policy Review, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 587-597
SSRN
In: International development planning review: IDPR, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 319-338
ISSN: 1478-3401
In: International development planning review: IDPR, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 319-339
ISSN: 1474-6743
In: International politics, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 227-243
ISSN: 1384-5748
World Affairs Online
In: Coexistence, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 227-244
In: European Climate Law Papers 2/2021, UNED, ISBN: 978-84-09-32352-4. https://blogs.uned.es/derechoclimatico/european-climate-law-working-paper-series/
SSRN
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 189-208
ISSN: 1460-3691
This article examines the internal decision-making process in the European Union when the EU participates in international environmental negotiations. More particularly, the practical functioning of the relation between the member states and the EU negotiator (i.e. the Commission, the Presidency or a lead country), representing the member states externally, is examined. Starting from principal—agent theory and based on empirical research on eight EU decision-making processes with regard to international environmental negotiations, the article argues, first, that control by the member states on the EU negotiator takes place most manifestly during the course of the international negotiations, and, second, that these ad locum control mechanisms perform not only a control function, but also a cooperation function.
In: THE LAW OF EU DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION (Entwicklungszusammenarbeit im Recht der Europäischen Union), S. Bartelt, P. Dann, eds., pp. 162-190, Europarecht-Beiheft, February, 2008
SSRN
In: Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta: naučnyj recenziruemyj žurnal = MGIMO review of international relations : scientific peer-reviewed journal, Heft 1(40), S. 184-192
ISSN: 2541-9099
The author of this article presents initiatives of the Republic of Kazakhstan to develop cooperation with the European Union that was initiated through 2000 - 2009. In 2000 the Republic of Kazakhstan proposed to EU Comment cooperation doctrine in Central Asia. The purpose of the doctrine lied in expanding cooperation in the areas of trade, economy and investment; in granting access to commodities and services from European markets; in developing collaboration in the areas of energy, transport, communication, finance and banking. In 2006 Kazakhstan introduced a new set of prepossess to the new European Union Strategy for Central Asian 2007-2013 that was developed under the chairmanship of Germany of the EU in the first half of 2007. The Strategy covered areas of cooperation such as regional integration, economic development, democratization, energy and security. In 2008 under the instructions of the President of Kazakhstan Ministry of Foreign Affairs in cooperation with other ministries developed a state programme "Path to Europe" for 2009 - 2011, which aided the priorities of cooperation between Kazakhstan and the European Union. "Path to Europe" has become a key initiative of the Kazakh foreign policy that was successfully implemented, as well as the most important document aimed at modernization of the national economy and the Kazakh society. In the beginning of2009 using the accumulated positive experience of cooperation with the EU and experience of a number of countries in Europe and Asia, Kazakhstan devised and submitted a concept of a new treaty which was supposed to replace the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement of 1995. The Republic of Kazakhstan's influence eventually persuaded the European Union to agree on the necessity of devising the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement.
In: International organization, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 201-202
ISSN: 1531-5088
The European Payments Union (EPU) was prolonged for a seventh year from July 1, 1956, without any alterations in the rules under which it had operated since August 1, 1955. The sixth annual report of EPU retraced the economic and financial developments in member countries during the fiscal year 1955–1956. It pointed out that economic activity had continued to expand, but in many countries demand had showed signs of growing rather faster than output, so that some inflationary pressures were felt in the form of rising prices and wages and of some weakening of individual balances of payments. The strongest advances in industrial output had occurred in France, with increases in west Germany, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands being next in importance; there had been no growth in the United Kingdom. Most countries had witnessed a gradual exhaustion of spare productive capacity and very full employment, with man-power shortages in certain specific sectors. A significant development in most countries had been the increase in fixed capital formation. In France and the United Kingdom especially, one main reason for it had been the fact that full use of industrial capacity had already been approached and labor shortages were appearing. The rise in investment expenditure, in conjunction with a continued increase of consumer expenditure, particularly on durable goods, had added to inflationary pressures. In a number of countries wage demand had seemed in excess of the probable rise in productivity; and in several countries wage increases had been granted. Between the second quarter of 1955 and the second quarter of 1956, prices had risen in most countries by 4–6 percent, and by even more in Iceland and Turkey.
In: World trade union movement: review of the World Federation of Trade Unions, Band 5, S. 19-20
ISSN: 0306-4824
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 319-334
ISSN: 0192-5121
In: NATO Review, S. 5p
NATO and the EU face similar strategic challenges, from bringing peace and security to their respective peripheries, through confronting terrorism, transnational crime, frozen conflicts, and potential pandemics. Greater efforts should be made to cooperate to promote security and stability and to avoid duplication and amplify influence for both organizations. Figures. Adapted from the source document.
In: Romanian military thinking, Band 2022, Heft 3, S. 106-121
ISSN: 1842-824X
"The development of the command and control capability for the crisis management operations conducted by the European Union has been a constant element in the context of European security and defence cooperation. The particular profile of the regulatory framework governing the activities performed under the auspices of the Common Security and Defence Policy has led to a specific EU capability building process. The formulas promoted in relation to both civilian and military components have taken various forms. However, the constant trend is to consolidate the options that the EU can employ in generating and conducting its own operations. They will add to the EU-NATO cooperation framework, developed from the earliest moments of the launch of European military operations. The developments in terms of the potential to generate and lead mixed civil-military commitments have been placed on similar coordinates. In practice, the stage in the development of the EU's command and control capabilities attests to the existence of a comprehensive and equally complex instrument that the EU can employ in managing its own operational commitments."