Suchergebnisse

The definition of authorities and the order of their acquirement by legislative bodies and executive power are considered in the article. The legitimacy of authorities in case of their acquirement by these bodies as well as the origin of authorities from the Ukrainian nation are under attention. The power considered as a characteristic element of authorities and the local government bodies and their official individuals possess such attribute as authoritativeness. It attests the genesis of this phenomenon, its origin from nation power. Nation as a source of power possesses this power in top extent and as a carrier of sovereignty concentrates main public functions. In civilized civil society they are allocated between country and other institutions depending on domains, on things of competence and on the extent of the obligatory of their authorities. The Main Law of Ukraine defines also the order of government formation. If parliament gets authority concerning the fulfillment of power directly from electors – the citizens of Ukraine, then the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine as the as supreme body of executive power receives necessary authority from Verhovna Rada of Ukraine, as it administered to accomplish the laws of Ukraine accepted by Verhovna Rada, having in mind that these laws are not only to define the order of government activity but also to establish its rights, duties and the circle of competence. Hereby, Verhovna Rada of Ukraine delegates the part of authorities received from Ukrainian nation – Ukrainian citizens of all nationalities, expressing sovereign will of nation to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. State power authorities in the domain of executive power along with responsibility for their fulfillment are allocated in order determined by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. However, it is important that citizens of Ukraine can directly accredit the bodies of executive power to fulfill certain functions of state government adopting laws by referendum. Therefore in first case the indirect delegacy of authoritative authorities happens, in another – delegacy is direct. Hereby, the general rule of acknowledgement of the legitimacy of authorities to the body of legislative or executive power, or functionary is that they both acquire authorities on the basis of the adherence of all demands of legislation and act in the manner determined in it. ; В статті розглядаються поняття повноважень та порядок їх набуття органами законодавчої і виконавчої влади. Звертається увага на легітимність повноважень у разі їх набуття даними органами, походження владних повноважень від народу України.

Визнання механізму держави цілісною системою, яка з огляду на формулю-вання ч. 2 ст. 5 Конституції складається з підсистеми органів державної вла-ди та підсистеми органів місцевого самоврядування [1], зумовлює об'єктивну потребу у з'ясуванні співвідношення сфери місцевого самоврядування зі сфе-рою виконавчої влади, якій належить ключова роль в управлінні державними справами. З точки зору проголошеного Конституцією принципу поділу дер-жавної влади її функціональне призначення полягає в організації виконання насамперед Конституції і законів України в процесі безпосереднього управлін-ня економічним, соціально-культурним та адміністративно-політичним будів-ництвом. Проте за умов демократичного політичного режиму функція держав-ного управління не є виключною функцією лише органів виконавчої влади. Вона має своє продовження в місцевому самоврядуванні, яке є однією з най-ефективніших форм залучення громадян до управління державними справа-ми на місцях. ; Визнання механізму держави цілісною системою, яка з огляду на формулю-вання ч. 2 ст. 5 Конституції складається з підсистеми органів державної вла-ди та підсистеми органів місцевого самоврядування [1], зумовлює об'єктивну потребу у з'ясуванні співвідношення сфери місцевого самоврядування зі сфе-рою виконавчої влади, якій належить ключова роль в управлінні державними справами. З точки зору проголошеного Конституцією принципу поділу дер-жавної влади її функціональне призначення полягає в організації виконання насамперед Конституції і законів України в процесі безпосереднього управлін-ня економічним, соціально-культурним та адміністративно-політичним будів-ництвом. Проте за умов демократичного політичного режиму функція держав-ного управління не є виключною функцією лише органів виконавчої влади. Вона має своє продовження в місцевому самоврядуванні, яке є однією з най-ефективніших форм залучення громадян до управління державними справа-ми на місцях. ; Визнання механізму держави цілісною системою, яка з огляду на формулю-вання ч. 2 ст. 5 Конституції складається з підсистеми органів державної вла-ди та підсистеми органів місцевого самоврядування [1], зумовлює об'єктивну потребу у з'ясуванні співвідношення сфери місцевого самоврядування зі сфе-рою виконавчої влади, якій належить ключова роль в управлінні державними справами. З точки зору проголошеного Конституцією принципу поділу дер-жавної влади її функціональне призначення полягає в організації виконання насамперед Конституції і законів України в процесі безпосереднього управлін-ня економічним, соціально-культурним та адміністративно-політичним будів-ництвом. Проте за умов демократичного політичного режиму функція держав-ного управління не є виключною функцією лише органів виконавчої влади. Вона має своє продовження в місцевому самоврядуванні, яке є однією з най-ефективніших форм залучення громадян до управління державними справа-ми на місцях.

Using the method of scientific modeling, the hypothesis has been experimentally tested, according to which, in a society with asymmetric exchange of resources, the configuration of political institutions consolidates the redistribution of authority in favor of resource-rich groups. The interaction of the factors implicit in the model shows the reproducibility of the flow of subjectivity in decision-making from territorial communities to resource-dependent groups of regional or all-Ukrainian levels, which in turn become centers for the formation of new networks of power and business ties. Тhe proposed theoretical model of decentralization of executive power in Ukraine was considered in two regimes: within the framework of the current legislation and within the framework of the institutional changes proposed by the President, set forth in the draft law "On amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine (regarding decentralization of power)". In both cases, the interaction of the factors put into the model reproduces the flow of self-governing subjectivity from the community to resource-intensive groups. Therefore, the decentralization of executive power in Ukraine will result in the institutional consolidation of cartel agreements between the networks of power and business ties within the distribution of power within individual territories of the country.Key words: decentralization, local self-government, power distribution of resources ; Стаття присвячена експериментальній перевірці за допомогою методу наукового моделювання гіпотези, згідно якої в суспільстві з асиметричним обміном ресурсами конфігурація політичних інститутів закріплює перерозподіл владних повноважень на користь ресурсозабезпечених груп. Взаємодія закладених у модель факторів показує відтворюваність перетікання суб'єктності у прийнятті рішень від територіальних громад до ресурсозабезпечених груп регіонального чи всеукраїнського рівнів, які в свою чергу стають центрами формування нових мереж владно-бізнесових зв'язків. Тому децентралізація виконавчої влади в Україні буде мати своїм результатом інституційне закріплення картельних угод між мережами владно-бізнесових зв'язків по розподілу влади в межах окремих територій країни.Ключові слова: децентралізація, місцеве самоврядування, владний розподіл ресурсів. С помощью метода научного моделирования экспериментально проверена гипотеза, согласно которой в обществе с асимметричным обменом ресурсами конфигурация политических институтов закрепляет перераспределение властных полномочий в пользу ресурсозабезпечених групп. Взаимодействие заложенных в модель факторов показывает воспроизводимость перетекания субъектности в принятии решений от территориальных общин к ресурсообеспеченным группам регионального или всеукраинского уровней, которые в свою очередь становятся центрами формирования новых сетей властно-бизнесовых связей. Поэтому децентрализация власти в Украине будет иметь своим результатом институциональное закрепление картельных соглашений между сетями властно-бизнесовых связей по распределению власти в пределах отдельных территорий страны.Ключевые слова: децентрализация, местное самоуправление, властное распределение ресурсов. Using the method of scientific modeling, the hypothesis has been experimentally tested, according to which, in a society with asymmetric exchange of resources, the configuration of political institutions consolidates the redistribution of authority in favor of resource-rich groups. The interaction of the factors implicit in the model shows the reproducibility of the flow of subjectivity in decision-making from territorial communities to resource-dependent groups of regional or all-Ukrainian levels, which in turn become centers for the formation of new networks of power and business ties. Тhe proposed theoretical model of decentralization of executive power in Ukraine was considered in two regimes: within the framework of the current legislation and within the framework of the institutional changes proposed by the President, set forth in the draft law "On amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine (regarding decentralization of power)". In both cases, the interaction of the factors put into the model reproduces the flow of self-governing subjectivity from the community to resource-intensive groups. Therefore, the decentralization of executive power in Ukraine will result in the institutional consolidation of cartel agreements between the networks of power and business ties within the distribution of power within individual territories of the country.Key words: decentralization, local self-government, power distribution of resources

The paper analyzed the basic scientifi c approaches to separation of concepts such as «executive» and «governance». Investigated the relationship between these concepts in the former Soviet Union and Europe. ; В статье проанализированы основные подходы ученых к разграничению таких понятий, как «исполнительная власть» и «государственное управление». Исследованы вопросы соотношения указанных понятий в странах бывшего СССР и странах Европы. ; У статті проаналізовано основні підходи науковців до розмежування таких понять, як «виконавча влада» та «державне управління». Досліджено питання їх співвідношення у країнах колишнього СРСР та Європи.

У статті проаналізовано основні підходи науковців до розмежування таких понять, як «виконавча влада» та «державне управління». Досліджено питання їх співвідношення у країнах колишнього СРСР та Європи. ; В статье проанализированы основные подходы ученых к разграничению таких понятий, как «исполнительная власть» и «государственное управление». Исследованы вопросы соотношения указанных понятий в странах бывшего СССР и странах Европы. ; The paper analyzed the basic scientifi c approaches to separation of concepts such as «executive» and «governance». Investigated the relationship between these concepts in the former Soviet Union and Europe.

Здійснено порівняльний аналіз розвитку наукової думки щодо визначення термінів та сутності органів виконавчої влади, а також їх місця і ролі у державному управління України. ; Осуществлен сравнительный анализ развития научной мысли относительно определения терминов и сущности органов исполнительной власти, а также их места и роли в государственном управлении Украины ; The comparative analysis of the development of scientific thought on the definition of terms and nature of the executive power, as well as their place and role in the government of Ukraine.

В статье исследованы проблемные вопросы обжалования подзаконных нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти Украины. Установлено, что порядок обжалования нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти можно разделить на административный и судебный ; The article deals with the problematic issues of challenging sub-legal normative acts of executive power bodies ofUkraine. Subordinate normative acts of executive power bodies are often issued with the violation of the norms contained in the law, sometimes even contrary to the legislative provisions, their number is constantly growing at a rapid pace, while not differing in the proper quality. At the same time, the quality of legal regulation of public relations in the state, protection of interests, rights and freedoms of citizens depends entirely on the quality of subordinate normative and legal acts, since no matter how perfect the law was not regulated in one or another sphere of public life, without proper implementation of legislative the provisions of the executive authorities, legal regulation can not be effective.To date,Ukrainehas two ways of resolving administrative and legal disputes - administrative and judicial. Administrative is the possibility of addressing a person whose rights, freedoms and legitimate interests are violated, with a complaint to "the body which directly violated its rights, or to a higher authority", and the court - in the possibility "of the appeal of a natural or legal person with a complaint directly to the court » Taking into account the above, it can be noted that the procedure for appealing sub-legal normative acts can be divided into: 1) administrative, which may include: the abolition of the rule-making body, the abolition of a parent body; the abolition by the body of justice of the decision on the state registration of the regulatory legal act and 2) the court, which may be subject to appeal of regulatory legal acts in court.It is believed that the court order of appeal has certain advantages over administrative ones. One of the main guarantees of the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals and legal entities inUkraineis the right to apply to the court if these persons consider that their rights, freedoms and legitimate interests are violated. The issue of the recognition of a legal act illegal or that does not comply with a legal act of higher legal force, is completely or in a separate part assigned to the jurisdiction of administrative courts ofUkraine.Improvement of the effective legislation on the creation of sub-normative legal acts of executive power bodies and the adoption of a single Law of Ukraine "On normative-legal acts" will help to eliminate and prevent further violations and inconsistencies in the creation of normative legal acts, correspondingly, to reduce the number of legal acts, norms which will be challenged, and as a consequence – an increase in the authority of the authorities and the state ; У статті досліджено проблемні питання оскарження підзаконних нормативно-правових актів органів виконавчої влади України. Встановлено, що порядок оскарження нормативно-правових актів органів виконавчої влади можна поділити на адміністративний і судовий

В статье исследованы проблемные вопросы обжалования подзаконных нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти Украины. Установлено, что порядок обжалования нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти можно разделить на административный и судебный ; The article deals with the problematic issues of challenging sub-legal normative acts of executive power bodies ofUkraine. Subordinate normative acts of executive power bodies are often issued with the violation of the norms contained in the law, sometimes even contrary to the legislative provisions, their number is constantly growing at a rapid pace, while not differing in the proper quality. At the same time, the quality of legal regulation of public relations in the state, protection of interests, rights and freedoms of citizens depends entirely on the quality of subordinate normative and legal acts, since no matter how perfect the law was not regulated in one or another sphere of public life, without proper implementation of legislative the provisions of the executive authorities, legal regulation can not be effective.To date,Ukrainehas two ways of resolving administrative and legal disputes - administrative and judicial. Administrative is the possibility of addressing a person whose rights, freedoms and legitimate interests are violated, with a complaint to "the body which directly violated its rights, or to a higher authority", and the court - in the possibility "of the appeal of a natural or legal person with a complaint directly to the court » Taking into account the above, it can be noted that the procedure for appealing sub-legal normative acts can be divided into: 1) administrative, which may include: the abolition of the rule-making body, the abolition of a parent body; the abolition by the body of justice of the decision on the state registration of the regulatory legal act and 2) the court, which may be subject to appeal of regulatory legal acts in court.It is believed that the court order of appeal has certain advantages over administrative ones. One of the main guarantees of the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals and legal entities inUkraineis the right to apply to the court if these persons consider that their rights, freedoms and legitimate interests are violated. The issue of the recognition of a legal act illegal or that does not comply with a legal act of higher legal force, is completely or in a separate part assigned to the jurisdiction of administrative courts ofUkraine.Improvement of the effective legislation on the creation of sub-normative legal acts of executive power bodies and the adoption of a single Law of Ukraine "On normative-legal acts" will help to eliminate and prevent further violations and inconsistencies in the creation of normative legal acts, correspondingly, to reduce the number of legal acts, norms which will be challenged, and as a consequence – an increase in the authority of the authorities and the state ; У статті досліджено проблемні питання оскарження підзаконних нормативно-правових актів органів виконавчої влади України. Встановлено, що порядок оскарження нормативно-правових актів органів виконавчої влади можна поділити на адміністративний і судовий

В статье исследованы проблемные вопросы обжалования подзаконных нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти Украины. Установлено, что порядок обжалования нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти можно разделить на административный и судебный ; The article deals with the problematic issues of challenging sub-legal normative acts of executive power bodies ofUkraine. Subordinate normative acts of executive power bodies are often issued with the violation of the norms contained in the law, sometimes even contrary to the legislative provisions, their number is constantly growing at a rapid pace, while not differing in the proper quality. At the same time, the quality of legal regulation of public relations in the state, protection of interests, rights and freedoms of citizens depends entirely on the quality of subordinate normative and legal acts, since no matter how perfect the law was not regulated in one or another sphere of public life, without proper implementation of legislative the provisions of the executive authorities, legal regulation can not be effective.To date,Ukrainehas two ways of resolving administrative and legal disputes - administrative and judicial. Administrative is the possibility of addressing a person whose rights, freedoms and legitimate interests are violated, with a complaint to "the body which directly violated its rights, or to a higher authority", and the court - in the possibility "of the appeal of a natural or legal person with a complaint directly to the court » Taking into account the above, it can be noted that the procedure for appealing sub-legal normative acts can be divided into: 1) administrative, which may include: the abolition of the rule-making body, the abolition of a parent body; the abolition by the body of justice of the decision on the state registration of the regulatory legal act and 2) the court, which may be subject to appeal of regulatory legal acts in court.It is believed that the court order of appeal has certain advantages over administrative ones. One of the main guarantees of the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals and legal entities inUkraineis the right to apply to the court if these persons consider that their rights, freedoms and legitimate interests are violated. The issue of the recognition of a legal act illegal or that does not comply with a legal act of higher legal force, is completely or in a separate part assigned to the jurisdiction of administrative courts ofUkraine.Improvement of the effective legislation on the creation of sub-normative legal acts of executive power bodies and the adoption of a single Law of Ukraine "On normative-legal acts" will help to eliminate and prevent further violations and inconsistencies in the creation of normative legal acts, correspondingly, to reduce the number of legal acts, norms which will be challenged, and as a consequence – an increase in the authority of the authorities and the state ; У статті досліджено проблемні питання оскарження підзаконних нормативно-правових актів органів виконавчої влади України. Встановлено, що порядок оскарження нормативно-правових актів органів виконавчої влади можна поділити на адміністративний і судовий

Здійснено порівняльний аналіз підзаконних нормативно-правових актів органіввиконавчої влади України та іноземних держав. Розглянуто можливість і доцільність запровадження позитивного досвіду останніх в нормотворчу діяльність органів виконавчої влади України. ; Проведен сравнительный анализ подзаконных нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти Украины и иностранных государств. Рассмотрена возможность и целесообразность внедрения положительного опыта последних в нормотворческую деятельность органов исполнительной власти Украины. ; Problem Setting. Having chosen the European integration path of development Ukraine has committed itself to adapt national legislation to the EU legislation. Approximation of legislation is a process of harmonization of regulations of a state in accordance with a certain standard. Today this process is regulated by the Law of Ukraine "On State Program of Adaptation of Ukraine to the European Union" of 18 March 2004, which involves the complex task of adaptation of Ukraine, aimed at improving the legislative and enforcement activities of public authorities.The actuality of the topic. Adapting legislation involves increasing demands for quality and consistency of regulatory legal acts issued by the authorized state bodies, especially the acts of the executive. The quality is subordinate regulatory acts depends entirely on the quality of legal regulation of social relations in the country, protect the interests, rights and freedoms, because no matter how perfect the legislation was not resolved this or that sphere of public life, without proper implementation of legal provisions by executive regulation effectively implemented can not.Courtesy of the author's definition of "executive power", defined as a separate branch of government entrusted with the task to implement management activities in the state, according to the law, through a specially created state bodies - executive bodies, which are the kind of public authorities who have the public-law power management powers to the viability of the country capable of applying coercive measures.The purpose of the article. The executive power of Ukraine today has three levels with corresponding sublevels: a higher level – the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; central level – the first sublevel – Ministries and second sublevel – central authorities; local level – the first sub-level – regional territorial offices of ministries and central authorities, the second sub-level – district, city, city, city district, inter-district regional offices of ministries and central authorities.The article analyzes the main types of subordinate regulatory acts Italy, Spain, France, Germany, Japan and the United States.The study was set types of subordinate normative legal acts of the executive (government, ministries, local authorities, etc.) in France, Germany, Italy, Japan almost coincide with the Ukrainian subordinate regulatory acts. It is also important that in these countries the legislation recognized regulatory function of regulations as a by-law (secondary) and primary legal regulation of social relations, which, in our opinion, is a positive experience that can be introduced by Ukrainian legislation.Conclusions. Positive, in our view, is the practice of some countries of Western Europe delegation of legislative powers from parliament to the government and consolidation of such procedures in the relevant legal acts. We believe that in Ukraine also need the legislation provide for the possibility of delegation of powers by appropriate amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine or the development and adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On the law-making activities and regulations", which define the grounds delegation of such powers possible terms, matters that can be regulated by acts of delegated legislation, the procedure of approval by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and others.

Здійснено порівняльний аналіз підзаконних нормативно-правових актів органіввиконавчої влади України та іноземних держав. Розглянуто можливість і доцільність запровадження позитивного досвіду останніх в нормотворчу діяльність органів виконавчої влади України. ; Проведен сравнительный анализ подзаконных нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти Украины и иностранных государств. Рассмотрена возможность и целесообразность внедрения положительного опыта последних в нормотворческую деятельность органов исполнительной власти Украины. ; Problem Setting. Having chosen the European integration path of development Ukraine has committed itself to adapt national legislation to the EU legislation. Approximation of legislation is a process of harmonization of regulations of a state in accordance with a certain standard. Today this process is regulated by the Law of Ukraine "On State Program of Adaptation of Ukraine to the European Union" of 18 March 2004, which involves the complex task of adaptation of Ukraine, aimed at improving the legislative and enforcement activities of public authorities.The actuality of the topic. Adapting legislation involves increasing demands for quality and consistency of regulatory legal acts issued by the authorized state bodies, especially the acts of the executive. The quality is subordinate regulatory acts depends entirely on the quality of legal regulation of social relations in the country, protect the interests, rights and freedoms, because no matter how perfect the legislation was not resolved this or that sphere of public life, without proper implementation of legal provisions by executive regulation effectively implemented can not.Courtesy of the author's definition of "executive power", defined as a separate branch of government entrusted with the task to implement management activities in the state, according to the law, through a specially created state bodies - executive bodies, which are the kind of public authorities who have the public-law power management powers to the viability of the country capable of applying coercive measures.The purpose of the article. The executive power of Ukraine today has three levels with corresponding sublevels: a higher level – the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; central level – the first sublevel – Ministries and second sublevel – central authorities; local level – the first sub-level – regional territorial offices of ministries and central authorities, the second sub-level – district, city, city, city district, inter-district regional offices of ministries and central authorities.The article analyzes the main types of subordinate regulatory acts Italy, Spain, France, Germany, Japan and the United States.The study was set types of subordinate normative legal acts of the executive (government, ministries, local authorities, etc.) in France, Germany, Italy, Japan almost coincide with the Ukrainian subordinate regulatory acts. It is also important that in these countries the legislation recognized regulatory function of regulations as a by-law (secondary) and primary legal regulation of social relations, which, in our opinion, is a positive experience that can be introduced by Ukrainian legislation.Conclusions. Positive, in our view, is the practice of some countries of Western Europe delegation of legislative powers from parliament to the government and consolidation of such procedures in the relevant legal acts. We believe that in Ukraine also need the legislation provide for the possibility of delegation of powers by appropriate amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine or the development and adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On the law-making activities and regulations", which define the grounds delegation of such powers possible terms, matters that can be regulated by acts of delegated legislation, the procedure of approval by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and others.

Здійснено порівняльний аналіз підзаконних нормативно-правових актів органіввиконавчої влади України та іноземних держав. Розглянуто можливість і доцільність запровадження позитивного досвіду останніх в нормотворчу діяльність органів виконавчої влади України. ; Проведен сравнительный анализ подзаконных нормативно-правовых актов органов исполнительной власти Украины и иностранных государств. Рассмотрена возможность и целесообразность внедрения положительного опыта последних в нормотворческую деятельность органов исполнительной власти Украины. ; Problem Setting. Having chosen the European integration path of development Ukraine has committed itself to adapt national legislation to the EU legislation. Approximation of legislation is a process of harmonization of regulations of a state in accordance with a certain standard. Today this process is regulated by the Law of Ukraine "On State Program of Adaptation of Ukraine to the European Union" of 18 March 2004, which involves the complex task of adaptation of Ukraine, aimed at improving the legislative and enforcement activities of public authorities.The actuality of the topic. Adapting legislation involves increasing demands for quality and consistency of regulatory legal acts issued by the authorized state bodies, especially the acts of the executive. The quality is subordinate regulatory acts depends entirely on the quality of legal regulation of social relations in the country, protect the interests, rights and freedoms, because no matter how perfect the legislation was not resolved this or that sphere of public life, without proper implementation of legal provisions by executive regulation effectively implemented can not.Courtesy of the author's definition of "executive power", defined as a separate branch of government entrusted with the task to implement management activities in the state, according to the law, through a specially created state bodies - executive bodies, which are the kind of public authorities who have the public-law power management powers to the viability of the country capable of applying coercive measures.The purpose of the article. The executive power of Ukraine today has three levels with corresponding sublevels: a higher level – the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; central level – the first sublevel – Ministries and second sublevel – central authorities; local level – the first sub-level – regional territorial offices of ministries and central authorities, the second sub-level – district, city, city, city district, inter-district regional offices of ministries and central authorities.The article analyzes the main types of subordinate regulatory acts Italy, Spain, France, Germany, Japan and the United States.The study was set types of subordinate normative legal acts of the executive (government, ministries, local authorities, etc.) in France, Germany, Italy, Japan almost coincide with the Ukrainian subordinate regulatory acts. It is also important that in these countries the legislation recognized regulatory function of regulations as a by-law (secondary) and primary legal regulation of social relations, which, in our opinion, is a positive experience that can be introduced by Ukrainian legislation.Conclusions. Positive, in our view, is the practice of some countries of Western Europe delegation of legislative powers from parliament to the government and consolidation of such procedures in the relevant legal acts. We believe that in Ukraine also need the legislation provide for the possibility of delegation of powers by appropriate amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine or the development and adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On the law-making activities and regulations", which define the grounds delegation of such powers possible terms, matters that can be regulated by acts of delegated legislation, the procedure of approval by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and others.

Purpose: The purpose of the article is a study of corruption at the level of ministries and departments, its origin and operation for later overcome, building organizational and management structure of the economy to meet the requirements of design-oriented development management. Methods: In this article applied the general principles and systemic and structural methods of constructing organizational structures both at the enterprise level and socio-economic systems as a whole. Results: Based on the conducted research it may be stated that Ukraine has overcome the elitist corruption at the level of ministries and agencies is essential to solving the problem of increasing the administrative capacity of the executive power. Substitution of ministries and agencies non-governmental structures will allow to overcome the existing system theft of a budget. Discussion: In the course of research substantiated, that there is no need to sustain those who are not able to realize themselves in socially useful areas - business, education (teachers, tutors, trainers), health (medical personnel), etc. Workers of these fields may be contained within the local budget, not central. And the most important thing is that the liquidation of the ministries and departments will be undermined by the preserved from the socialist era system of financial and material distribution, transformed into a system plundering of a budget. ; Цель: Целью статьи является исследование коррупции на уровне министерств и ведомств, ее зарождения и функционирования для последующего преодоления, построения организационно-управленческой структуры экономики, отвечающей требованиям проектно-ориентированного управления развитием. Методы: В этой статье использованы общие принципы, а также системные та структурные методы построения организационных структур как на уровне предприятия так и социально-экономических систем в целом. Результаты: На основании проведеного иследования можна утверждать, что в Украине преодоление элитарной коррупции на уровне министерств и ...

Concepts of system of executive power institutions, presidentialization of system of executive power institutions, electoral process are analysed.The object of research is the electoral process in the CIS countries. The subject of research is the electoral process as a factor of presidentialization of the systems of executive power institutions in these countries. The goal of the research is determining the features of electoral process in the context of presidentialization of systems of executive power institutions in the CIS countries.Presidential system in Turkmenistan (since 1992); the semi-presidential systems in Azerbaijan (since 1995), Armenia (since 1995), Belarus (since 1996), Georgia (2004-2009), Kazakhstan (since 1995), Kyrgyzstan (1996-2010), Russia (since 1993-2005 – at the federal level; 2005-2008 and since 2012 – the whole system of executive power institutions), Tajikistan (since 1995), Uzbekistan (since 1995), Ukraine (1996-2004 and since 2010) аnd parliamentary system in Moldova (in 2001-2009 – at the highest and central levels in the system of executive power institutions and in 2001 -2007 – at local level) are defined as presidentializated. Thereby we can talk about presidentialization of the systems of executive power institutions in these countries.Determining features of the electoral process in the CIS countries, we set that these features lead to presidentialization of the systems of executive power institutions at specific stages of the development of political systems in these countries. In further studies, the main goal will be to specificate the stages and levels, determine other factors, institutional and functional consequences of presidentialization of the systems of executive power institutions in the CIS countries. ; Проанализированы понятия «система институтов исполнительной власти», «президенциализация системы институтов исполнительной власти», «избирательный процесс». Определены особенности избирательного процесса в контексте президенциализации систем институтов исполнительной власти встранах CНГ. ; Проаналізовано поняття «система інститутів виконавчої влади», «президенціалізація системи інститутів виконавчої влади», «виборчий процес». Визначено особливості виборчого процесу в контексті президенціалізації систем інститутів виконавчої влади у країнах CНД

Проаналізовано системи інститутів виконавчої влади у країнах CНД. Запропоновано методики визначення «сили» президентів і прем'єр-міністрів у системах правління зазначених країн. На підставі цих методик та політичної практики визначено наскільки системи інститутів виконавчої влади у країнах CНД є президенціалізованими. ; Systems of institutions of executive power in the CIS countries are analysed. Methods which enable to determine the «power» of presidents and prime ministers in these countries are offered. On the basis of these methods and political practice we have determined the extent of presidentialization of the systems of executive power institutions in the CIS countries.The object of research are the systems of executive power institutions in the CIS countries. The subject of research is presidentialization of systems of executive power institutions in the foregoing countries. The goal of the research is index and practical analysis of systems of executive power institutions in the CIS countries.Preferring the political practice (real power of the president / the prime-minister in political system; the role and position of the president / the prime minister in the system of executive power institutions) the semi-presidential systems in Azerbaijan (since 1995), Armenia (since 1995), Belarus (since 1996),Georgia (2004 – 2009), Kazakhstan (since 1995), Kyrgyzstan (1996 – 2007), Russia (since 1993 – at the federal level, and since 2005 – at the level of subjects of federation), Tajikistan (since 1995), Uzbekistan (since 1995), Ukraine (1996 – 2004 and since 2010) аnd parliamentary system in Moldova (in 2001 – 2009 – at the highest and central levels in the system of executive power institutions and in 2001 – 2007 – at local level) are defined as presidentializated. Thereby we can talk about presidentializationof the systems of executive power institutions in these countries. In further studies, the main goal will be to specificate the stages and levels, determine factors, institutional and functional consequences of presidentialization of the systems of executive power institutions in the CIS countries. ; Проанализированы системы институтов исполнительной власти в странах СНГ. Предложены методики определения «силы» президентов и премьер-министров в системах правления указаных стран. На основании этих методик и политической практики определено насколько системы институтов исполнительной власти в странах СНГ являются президенциализированными.