Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
The Executive Power Clause
In: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 167 (Forthcoming)
SSRN
Cybersecurity and Executive Power
In: Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 1788333
SSRN
Working paper
Executive Power in Venezuela
In: American political science review, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 422-441
ISSN: 1537-5943
Throughout most of its national history, Venezuela has been the victim of long and tyrannical dictatorships, broken only by brief spells of semi-democratic government. Constitution after constitution has fallen before the whims of self made generals. Numerous major revolts and countless minor civil uprisings have scarred the country, all having the twofold objective of acquiring for their leaders national power for power's sake and the privilege of organizing Venezuela as a private economic and political domain.In almost all instances the politicians have travelled a bloody road to national power. Having once established themselves in the presidency, they demonstrated considerable reluctance to observe the functional separation of powers decreed by the constitution. As a result of this attitude the legislature and judiciary were weakened to the point of impotency. The raison d'être of these branches thus came to be the legalization of the programs and activities of the executive, even if this meant, as it often did, violating the constitution. The purpose of this article is to examine the evolution and application of executive power.
Executive Power in Crisis
In: American political science review, Band 115, Heft 4, S. 1406-1423
ISSN: 1537-5943
Major crises can threaten political regimes by empowering demagogues and promoting authoritarian rule. While existing research argues that national emergencies weaken formal checks on executive authority and increase public appetites for strong leadership, no research evaluates whether crises increase mass support for the president's institutional authority. We study this question in the context of the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic with an experiment embedded in a national survey of more than 8,000 U.S. adults. We find no evidence that the public evaluated policies differently if they were implemented via unilateral power rather than through the legislative process, nor did the severity of the pandemic at either the state, local, or individual levels moderate evaluations of executive power. Instead, individuals' partisan and ideological views were consistently strong predictors of policy attitudes. Perhaps paradoxically, our results suggest that elite and mass polarization limit the opportunity for crises to promote public acceptance of strengthened executive authority.
Jefferson and Executive Power
In: Boston University Law Review, Band 88, Heft 2
SSRN
Roadblocks to executive power
In: The world today, Band 72, Heft 5, S. 1
ISSN: 0043-9134
THE EXECUTIVE POWER IN SWITZERLAND
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics
ISSN: 1460-2482
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
Executive power and our security
In: The national interest, Heft 7, S. 3-13
ISSN: 0884-9382
World Affairs Online
The executive power in Switzerland
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of representative politics, Band 9, S. 439-447
ISSN: 0031-2290
Passive-Aggressive Executive Power
In: Maryland Law Review, Band 73, S. 227
SSRN
Executive power in the United Kingdom
In: European review of public law: Revue européenne de droit public = Revista europea de derecho público, Band 3, S. 135-147
ISSN: 1105-1590, 0963-519X