Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
2022 Spring. ; Colorado State University Art and Art History Department capstone project. ; Capstone contains the artist's statement, a list of works, and images of works. ; The artist's statement: This body of work encompasses my experiences and thoughts regarding issues that are the focus of the contemporary feminist movement. This ongoing series provides both a reflective practice while providing a space for this assemblage of research to exist beyond my person. Present within my work are themes that consider the objectification and self-objectification of women: how individuals and communities alike can distill a person down to their parts. I dig deep into the conversation of violence against women, drawing my personal experiences of domestic abuse as a child and sexual assault I endured as a teenager. Women are valued for their bodies—how their physicality can serve and satisfy others—but this unwanted objectification reveals a disparity between a hyper-cultural focus, but a lack of research, study, and representation within science and medicine. Our understanding of female anatomy and acceptance of concepts surrounding female pleasure has continually lagged understanding of male anatomy and acceptance of male pleasure. Even when sex education isn't a point of contingency, curricula censor topics and behaviors integral to every human being, regardless of identity. This educational ignorance and systemic shaming then affect individual opinions, cultural practices, and regulatory legislation that ultimately oppress rights to bodily autonomy. These issues are pervasive to my life. They enlighten my worldview, shape my behaviors, and impact me in very obvious, as well as insidiously unconscious, ways. I tell stories I haven't had the strength to utter before and take up space I didn't think I deserved to enhance recognition, advocate for change, and empower others to do the same. I present my personal experiences to solidify and contextualize these encompassing social issues. I chose "hysterics" as the title ...
BASE
In: A Lenape among the Quakers, S. 7-34
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 97-99
In: Research Policy, Band 40, Heft 7, S. 895-896
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 52, S. 17-20
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 66, Heft 5, S. 242-244
ISSN: 2161-7953
At less than two years duration, the ambassadorship of John Freeman was the second shortest covered by this book. It took place, too, in a singularly uneventful period in Anglo-American relations, between the dramas of 1967–68 — when the devaluation of Sterling and Britain's decision to withdraw from East of Suez were swiftly followed by the Tet offensive — and the 'Nixon shocks' over Sino-American rapprochement and trade control in 1971. Yet it was a controversial ambassadorship, a political appointment by Labour premier Harold Wilson that was heavily criticised from the outset. Freeman was lucky even to arrive in Washington in March 1969. He had been selected for the post over a year earlier, when the incumbent Lyndon Johnson or, when he withdrew from the race, Vice-President Hubert Humphrey was expected to win the 1968 race for the Presidency. Few could have predicted that victory would in fact fall to the Republican Richard Nixon, who had lost the 1960 election and then failed to win the Governorship of his home state, California. After the California result, Freeman, then editor of the New Statesman, had written Nixon off as 'a man of no principle whatsoever except a willingness to sacrifice everything in the cause of Dick Nixon'. According to Nixon's National Security Adviser, Henry Kissinger, the new President 'swore that he would have nothing to do with Freeman', a view reinforced by the former President Dwight Eisenhower, who argued that the appointment was an insult to the Presidency itself.
BASE
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 498-513
ISSN: 1475-8059
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 62, S. 208-210
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: International law reports, Band 19, S. 220-221
ISSN: 2633-707X
British Commonwealth of Nations — Privileges of Visiting Forces — Visiting Forces (British Commonwealth) Act, 1933.Jurisdiction — Territorial — Exemptions from — Foreign Visiting Forces — Forces of Another Member of British Commonwealth — Visiting Forces (British Commonwealth) Act, 1933.
In: International law reports, Band 20, S. 184-186
ISSN: 2633-707X
Jurisdiction — Exemptions from — Foreign Armed Forces — Visiting Forces — Canadian Soldier in the United Kingdom — Whether a "Public Authority" for Purposes of the Limitation Act — Running-down Case — Limitation Act, 1939 — Visiting Forces (British Commonwealth) Act, 1933.