The Rejang of Southern Sumatra
In: Occasional papers 19
212 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Occasional papers 19
World Affairs Online
Erscheinungsjahre: 2012- (elektronisch)
The government of the South Kalimantan Province moved the provincial capital from Banjarmasin to Banjarbaru at the end of 2011. However, there has not been a clear decision as to what the government's old building will be used for. One thing is clear, the utilization has to be optimized by considering the local government regulations. The aim of the research is to examine the highest and the best alternatives of utilization that can be adopted for such an asset. Non-probability sampling method was used in the research to find the alternatives. The alternatives were analyzed by using the highest and the best use analysis as the relevance test instrument for each of them. After analyzing the alternatives, the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) analysis was conducted to analyze the alternatives prior to determining their feasibility. Legal analysis, physical analysis, financial analysis, and the maximum productivity analysis were the stages conducted on the research based on highest and best use analysis. Based on the result of the research, the alternative which is feasible to do is that the building is used for other governmental or public purposes. Through the analysis, the alternative meets the criteria of the analysis as mentioned before with NPV Rp. 747,439,143 and BCR 1.024. Furthermore, according to 42.5 percent of the respondents, the building is best used for UPT offices and other institutions.
BASE
Researcher conducted a study with the aim to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis: 1) the validity of the content and empirical, 2) reliability, 3) level of difficulty, 4) distinguishing features, and 5) the function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. The sample was a set of second semester final exam subjects biology grade XI IPA SMAof the school year 2015/2016 in the south region district solok. Quantitative analysis was performed by using Anates, while for the qualitative analysis carried out by the study table. Based on the results of data analysis, the result for the review of aspects: 1) the validity of the content, about 7.5% did not meet the material aspect, 40% of questions that do not meet aspects of construction, and 77.5% did not meet aspects of language problems, and validity empirically, 52.5% are invalid matter, 2) reliability, the test has a value of 0.67 belong to the category enough, 3) the level of difficulty, 5% classified as very easy matter, 22.5% easy, 40% about the medium, 17 , 5% about the difficult, and 15% about the very difficult, 4) different power, 15% of matter which is classified as very bad, 15% about the relatively ugly, 30% about enough, and 40% items good, 5) function options, for options that are not qualified humbug is 75% and the quality is 25%. It can be concluded that the end of the semester exam subjects biology grade XI of the school year 2015/2016 in the south region district solok not meet both criteria.
BASE
학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 행정학과, 2012. 2. 엄석진. ; 이 연구는 '입법에 의한 행정통제의 제도화' 과정을 입체적으로 살펴보기 위하여, 김영삼 정권 시기에 제정된 행정절차법과 정보공개법의 제정과정을 옹호연합모형(ACF)을 적용하여 비교 분석한 것이다. 이를 통하여 대통령과 행정부, 의회 등 입법과정의 주요 행위자에 초점을 두어 한국 행정절차법 제정과정을 연구한 Ginsburg(2001)의 고착 모형(Lock-in Model)과 Baum(2007)의 통제 모형(Rein-in Model)이 간과한 시민단체·학계·정당 등의 활동과 관료제의 반발 등 다양한 행위자 간의 상호작용을 규명하고자 하였다. 분석 결과, 첫째, 양 법률의 제정 과정에서 적극적 개혁연합과 보수적 개혁연합이 존재하였으며, 촉발기제 및 여론의 관심, 옹호연합의 대립과 입법 주도권 정도에 따라 입법의 지연과 법률 내용의 변화를 가져왔다. 특히 양 법률의 제정과정을 비교함으로써 이와 같은 상호작용의 특성이 입법의 지연과 법률 내용의 변화를 가져온 주요한 원인이었음을 새롭게 발견할 수 있었다. 둘째, 입법 과정에서 국회의 영향력은 미약하였으며, 대통령이 강한 리더십으로 입법을 추진하더라도 법률의 규율 대상인 관료제가 입법 과정에 참여함으로써 법률 내용에 한계가 나타났다. 이는 그동안 김영삼 정부 시기의 행정법제 개혁에 대한 상반된 평가, 즉 한편으로는 행정절차법과 정보공개법의 제정으로 법치주의를 향한 진전이 있었다고 평가되면서도, 그 내용적 측면에서는 소극적이고 수세적이며 지속적인 개선이 필요하다는 지적에 대해 제정과정 측면에서 해답을 제시하고 있다. 즉, 양 법률 공히 제정과정에서 국회가 주도적 역할을 하지 못한 가운데, 대통령의 리더십과 시민사회의 요구를 바탕으로 입법이 추진되었지만, 양 법률의 규율 대상인 관료제가 입법과정에 깊숙이 참여함으로써 내용적 측면에서 한계가 나타날 수밖에 없었음을 보여준다. 결과적으로 이 연구는 양 법률의 제정 과정을 비교함으로써 시민단체·학계 등의 활동과 관료제의 반발 등 다양한 행위자 간의 상호작용을 규명하고, 이와 같은 상호작용의 특성이 입법의 지연과 법률 내용의 변화를 가져온 주요한 원인이었음을 발견하였다. 향후 대통령과 관료제 간의 심층적인 상호작용 및 정책중개자의 실체와 역할 등을 밝히는 연구가 추가적으로 이루어진다면, 김영삼 정부 시기 행정법제 개혁의 성과와 한계를 체계적으로 밝히는데 기여할 수 있을 것이다. ; This study aims to do the comparative analysis of the enactment process of the Administrative Procedure Act(APA) and the Freedom of Information Act(FOIA) enacted in the Kim Young Sam regime by applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF) with a view to looking into the various aspects of the process of 'Institutionalization in control of administrative process by the legislative'. This study has the purpose of identifying the interactions of a large variety of agents such as civil organizations, academic profession, political parties and bureaucracy which was overlooked in the previous studies - Lock-in Model by Ginsburg(2001) and Rein-in Model by Baum(2007) - which analyzed the enactment process of Administrative Procedures Act in Korea, focusing on the official agents in the legislative process such as President, the executive branch, and Congress, etc. The results and the findings of this study can be summarized as follows. First, there were two major agents in the enactment process of the APA and FOIA, the active coalition and the conservative coalition, which resulted in the delay of the legislation and the modification of the laws depending on triggering mechanisms, the public's attention, legislative advocacy coalition, and the degree of the initiative. In particular, by comparing the enactment processes of both Acts, it was concluded that the characteristic of the interactions as above was the major cause that led to the delay of the legislation and the modification of the laws. Second, even after democratization in Korea, the influence of the National Assembly in the legislative process was weak. Even though presidential's legislative power was strong, limitations on the institutionalization of legal control has still remained because executive branch as target discipline has been involved in the legislative process. Thus, the findings of this study may partially provide answers to the question on differences between APA and FOIA legislation process. The dynamics of power was present between bureaucrats and civil organizations in the legislative process, and the contents of the bill and the time delay varied with the degree of a legislative initiative of officials who was the main opposition coalition in the enactment process. The further research in the future on in-depth interaction between the president and the bureaucracy, and on the role of the policy broker will be able to contribute to systematically elucidate in the achievements and limits of the reforms of administrative laws in the Kim Young Sam regime. ; Master
BASE
In: Hanul ak'ademi 883
In: 한울 아카데미 883
In: Kyŏngsang Taehakkyo Sahoe Kwahak Yŏn'guwŏn sahoe kwahak yŏn'gu ch'ongsŏ 25
In: 경상 대학교 사회 과학 연구원 사회 과학 연구 총서 25
In: Asea Munje Yŏnʾguso Hanʾguk sahoe kwahak yŏnʾgu chʿongsŏ 4
In: Hanguk munhwasa 16