Indigenous Diplomacy
In: The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, S. 642-653
In: The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, S. 642-653
In: Nationalism & ethnic politics, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 75-100
ISSN: 1557-2986
In: The journal of development studies, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 175-187
ISSN: 1743-9140
The legacies of borders are far-reaching for Indigenous Peoples. This collection offers new ways of understanding borders by departing from statist approaches to territoriality. Bringing together the fields of border studies, human rights, international relations, and Indigenous studies, it features a wide range of voices from across academia, public policy, and civil society. The contributors explore the profound and varying impacts of borders on Indigenous Peoples around the world and the ways borders are challenged and worked around. From Bangladesh's colonially imposed militarized borders to resource extraction in the Russian Arctic and along the Colombia-Ecuador border to the transportation of toxic pesticides from the United States to Mexico, the chapters examine sovereignty, power, and obstructions to Indigenous rights and self-determination as well as globalization and the economic impacts of borders. Indigenous Peoples and Borders proposes future action that is informed by Indigenous Peoples' voices, needs, and advocacy.Contributors. Tone Bleie, Andrea Carmen, Jacqueline Gillis, Rauna Kuokkanen, Elifuraha Laltaika, Sheryl Lightfoot, David Bruce MacDonald, Toa Elisa Maldonado Ruiz, Binalakshmi "Bina" Nepram, Melissa Z. Patel, Manoel B. do Prado Junior, Hana Shams Ahmed, Elsa Stamatopoulou, Liubov Suliandziga, Rodion Sulyandziga, Yifat Susskind, Erika M. Yamada
Health research tends to be deficit-based by nature; as researchers we typically quantify or qualify absence of health markers or presence of illness. This can create a narrative with far reaching effects for communities already subject to stigmatization. In the context of Indigenous health research, a deficit-based discourse has the potential to contribute to stereotyping and marginalization of Indigenous Peoples in wider society. This is especially true when researchers fail to explore the roots of health deficits, namely colonization, Westernization, and intergenerational trauma, risking conflation of complex health challenges with inherent Indigenous characteristics. In this paper we explore the incompatibility of deficit-based research with principles from several ethical frameworks including the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2) Chapter 9, OCAP® (ownership, control, access, possession), Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami National Inuit Strategy on Research, and Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research (CCGHR) Principles for Global Health Research. Additionally we draw upon cases of deficit-based research and stereotyping in healthcare, in order to identify how this relates to epistemic injustice and explore alternative approaches. ; La recherche en santé a tendance à être basée sur les déficits; en tant que chercheurs, généralement nous quantifions ou qualifions l'absence de marqueurs de santé ou la présence d'une maladie. Cela peut créer un récit ayant des effets d'une grande portée pour les communautés déjà victimes de stigmatisation. Dans le contexte de la recherche en santé autochtone, un discours basé sur les déficits peut contribuer aux stéréotypes et à la marginalisation des peuples autochtones dans une société élargie. C'est particulièrement vrai lorsque les chercheurs ne parviennent pas à explorer les racines des déficits de santé, à savoir la colonisation, l'occidentalisation et les traumatismes intergénérationnels, au risque de confondre des problèmes de santé complexes avec des caractéristiques autochtones inhérentes. Dans cet article, nous explorons l'incompatibilité de la recherche basée sur les déficits avec les principes de plusieurs cadres éthiques, y compris le chapitre 9 de l'Énoncé de politique des trois Conseils (EPTC2), les principes PCAP® (propriété, contrôle, accès, possession), la Stratégie nationale sur la recherche inuite Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami et les principes de la Coalition canadienne pour la recherche en santé mondiale (CCRSM). En outre, nous nous appuyons sur des cas de recherche basée sur les déficits et le stéréotypage dans le domaine des soins de santé, dans le but d'identifier leur lien avec l'injustice épistémique et d'explorer des approches alternatives.
BASE
Policing in Indigenous communities is an issue that demands attention to a range of broad political, socio-economic, cultural and historical contexts, as well as the more mundane matters of police operational concern. Given the complexity of the topic, this chapter will be selective and, from necessity, concentrate relatively briefly on a few key themes. They include the following: · The background to the contemporary relationship between police and Indigenous people. · A discussion of some of the key drivers for reform including the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCADIC), and more recently Aboriginal Justice Advisory Councils (AJACs) and the development of Aboriginal Justice Agreements. · A discussion of some of the key policing approaches specific to Indigenous communities such as Aboriginal liaison officers and Aboriginal community police. · A discussion of some of the key interface issues between police and community including the development of Indigenous community justice mechanisms.
BASE
"Indigenous traditions can be uplifting, positive, and liberating forces when they are connected to living systems of thought and practice. Problems arise when they are treated as timeless models of unchanging truth that require unwavering deference and unquestioning obedience. Freedom and Indigenous Constitutionalism celebrates the emancipatory potential of Indigenous traditions, considers their value as the basis for good laws and good lives, and critiques the failure of Canadian constitutional traditions to recognize their significance."--
In: Cultural Survival quarterly: world report on the rights of indigenous people and ethnic minorities, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 6-7
ISSN: 0740-3291
In: International journal of human rights, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 51-72
ISSN: 1744-053X
In: Latin American research review, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 220-233
ISSN: 1542-4278