Insurgency and Maritime Law
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 31, S. 144-154
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 31, S. 144-154
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 31, S. 136-144
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Studies in history, economics and public law, no. 470
In: American political science review, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 797-798
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 223, Heft 1, S. 236-236
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: Foreign affairs, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 86
ISSN: 0015-7120
In: American political science review, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 650-683
ISSN: 1537-5943
Long sessions in presidential years are short ones in the sense that the conventions dictate earlier and more definite limits than even Washington weather invites. Moving to such an end, the recent session could not escape the season's contagion. Yet presidential politics hardly set the tone of the session. Its work had unusual inherent interest. The array of questions before it, mingling economic and technical elements, was indicative of the trend of problems of public policy. It presented the paradox of all Congresses, of course: partisanship in building the machine; eclectic voting or bipartisan combinations in the actual passing of bills.Membership. The Republican majority in the House had been cut by the 1926 elections and by a party shift in one of five by-elections from 61 to 40—a margin safe enough for purposes of organization, even apart from the relaxed mood and leaderless condition of insurgency in the lower chamber.In the Senate, however, the Republican lead had been reduced to a hair. Even if Smith of Illinois and Vare of Pennsylvania were counted, those called Republicans numbered only 48, against 47 Democrats and a Farmer Labor member. Deaths chanced to net the Republicans a seat, so that at the session's close, although lacking Smith and Vare, they still had a plurality of one. Two empty seats in the meantime were evidence of the weakness of the regular Senate Republicans when deprived of the aid of House amendments and House conferees.