Lost in Globalization: International Economic Integration and the Sources of Popular Discontent1
In: International Studies Quarterly, Band 56, Heft 3, S. 484-500
In: International Studies Quarterly, Band 56, Heft 3, S. 484-500
In: International economic integration 2
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 56, Heft 3, S. 484-501
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
In: Production and Operations Management, 2011
SSRN
In: Dilemmas of European Integration, S. 181-201
In: Princeton studies in international finance 16
In: https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/17067
Based on the positions of taking into account geoeconomic factors and processes of international economic integration, a conceptual model of attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) in the industry of the regions of Ukraine has been developed, which target is to ensure consistency of interests between a recipient region and foreign investors in investing. Goals. The goal of the article is to substantiate theoretical provisions and develop practical recommendations for improving conceptual model of attracting foreign direct investment in the industry of Ukrainian regions. Methods. Methodological basis of the article are fundamental provisions of economics, economic theory, the theory of foreign investment, as well as scientific results of leading domestic and foreign scientists and economists on foreign investment issues. Main results. A system of principles for the implementation of such model has been proposed, which includes general and specific principles, particular sectoral orientation, adaptability, complexity, efficiency, coherence and publicity. A system of coordinated goals and measures of regional investment policy within the conceptual model has been formed, which is structured in the following areas: creation of an effective system of FDI incentives in terms of technological modernization of industry, formation of attractive investment image of regional industries taking into account best international practice and setting up intensive and effective cooperation between local governments and FDI donor countries.
BASE
In: Annual review of political science, Band 8, S. 399-423
ISSN: 1545-1577
In this review, we address three principal questions that have dominated the debate over the distributive effects of globalization. First, how has globalization affected inequality among countries? Second, how has globalization affected inequality within countries? Third, how has globalization affected the ability of national governments to redistribute wealth & risk within countries? We conclude that despite the proliferation of research on the consequences of globalization, there is no solid consensus in the relevant literature on any of these questions, largely because scholars disagree about how to measure globalization & about how to draw causal inferences about its effects. We also suggest possible foci for future research. 4 Tables, 6 Figures, 81 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Annual review of political science, Band 8, S. 399-424
ISSN: 1094-2939
In: Problems of economics: selected articles from Soviet economics journals in English translation, Band 18, S. 72-90
ISSN: 0032-9436
Recently, some leaders in different countries have promoted positions towards immigration and formal international economic integration that contest policy recommendations resting on predominant microeconomic and international economics theories. The cases of Brexit, the new presidency in the United States of America, and election processes in countries such as Germany and France have put forward topics showing distrust or, at least, great disappointment in free markets and open economies. Inequality in income distribution and social exclusion in developing and developed countries have triggered a protectionist discourse of some political or independent leaders seeking to gain political power. All this might represent a significant challenge for higher education institutions offering courses and doing research based on the principles of mainstream economics. Considering the previous context, using panel data for the period from 1985 to 2014, this paper analyses the impact of the degree of formal integration and migration on human development in 26 countries located in three continents and that are part of international integration instruments such as the World Trade Organisation, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the European Union. The analysis sheds light on what makes a difference in terms of human development and to what extent, contributing to inform the debate on the impact of countries' openness to international flows of goods, services and labour.
BASE
In: European economy, Heft 6, S. 1-409
ISSN: 0379-0991
World Affairs Online
In: FLOWENLA discussion paper 15