Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations
ISSN: 2570-9429
455 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
ISSN: 2570-9429
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Politologický časopis, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 77-79
ISSN: 1211-3247
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 47, Heft 3, S. 102-107
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 83-86
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
World Affairs Online
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 49, Heft 3, S. 55-59
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 126
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 115-119
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 45, Heft 3, S. 111-114
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
World Affairs Online
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 79-83
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 5-19
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
Neoliberal institutionalism, developed by Robert Keohane, & liberal theory of international relations elaborated by Andrew Moravcsik, nowadays represent two grand International Relations (IR) theories drawing on liberalism as one of the main theoretical approaches in this discipline. However, Keohane conceived of neoliberal institutionalism as a synthesis of realism & liberalism & Moravcsik proceeds from a specific understanding of liberalism & defines liberalism by the criteria of empirical social science. This essay examines, therefore, whether neoliberal institutionalism & liberal theory indeed involve & assemble together the main ideas of liberalism. The perspective applied in the essay is based on the intellectual history of liberalism and, in this way, regards the assumptions about the most fundamental actor in international relations & about the evolution of international relations as the intellectual core of liberalism. According to liberalism, individuals & collective social actors constituted by individuals (social & bureaucratic groups) are the most fundamental actors in international relations & international relations undergo transformation, in the course of which cooperation gradually prevails over conflict. Neoliberal institutionalism considers the state to be the most fundamental actor in international relations & assumes that the nature of international relations transforms & they acquire a more cooperative character. Liberal theory claims that individuals & social groups are the most fundamental actors & that international relations undergo transformation that is marked by the growth of cooperation. Consequently, whereas neoliberal institutionalism involves the intellectual core of liberalism only to some extent, liberal theory implies that there is a grand theory that subsumes the main ideas of liberalism. Adapted from the source document.
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 5-28
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
This article offers a critical review of the few existing scholarly attempts to conceptualize & theorize the study of peacekeeping operations. It reveals that even though the study of peacekeeping operations is burgeoning, most of the available literature is idiosyncratic & atheoretical. Although some authors have recently utilized various concepts from international relations theory for analysis of peacekeeping operations, the potentially diverse international peacekeeping theories are yet to be fully integrated into international relations theory. After inspecting future research agendas outlined by the leading experts in the field, the author critiques the recent calls for a "macrotheory" of international peacekeeping. Adapted from the source document.