International Organisation
In: International affairs
ISSN: 1468-2346
49197 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International affairs
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Année politique suisse: Schweizerische Politik, Band 49, S. 136-137
ISSN: 0066-2372
In: Année politique suisse: Schweizerische Politik, Band 48, S. 122-124
ISSN: 0066-2372
In: Année politique suisse: Schweizerische Politik, Band 47
ISSN: 0066-2372
In: Année politique suisse: Schweizerische Politik, Band 46
ISSN: 0066-2372
In: Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung: UWSF ; Zeitschrift für Umweltchemie und Ökotoxikologie ; Organ des Verbandes für Geoökologie in Deutschland (VGöD) und der Eco-Informa, Band 3, Heft 5, S. 318-318
ISSN: 1865-5084
In: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 112-127
ISSN: 1467-8292
In: Nordisk tidsskrift for international ret, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 74-76
ISSN: 1875-2934, 1571-8107
In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte: APuZ, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 17-32
ISSN: 0479-611X
In: GIGA Focus Global, Band 4
International organisations have recently come under pressure. Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and the rise of China appear to all indicate the same thing: established international organisations are losing authority. In reality, however, the formal authority of international organisations has grown significantly in recent decades.
International organisations have become more authoritative over the past few decades – that is, they are now less dependent on control by individual member states. The growing authority of international organisations is reflected in the increasing extent to which national governments (a) set aside their vetoes by endorsing majoritarian forms of decision-making (pooling) and (b) empower independent institutions to act on their behalf (delegation).
This rise in international authority involves trade-offs, as pooling and delegation seldom go together. In task-specific organisations, pooling is widespread, whereas delegation is limited; in general-purpose organisations, the opposite is the case.
The reasons for the rise in international authority are threefold: (i) the functional quest for effective cooperation, (ii) increasing political demands for participation by non-governmental actors, and (iii) the diffusion of authoritative institutional templates amongst international organisations. These forces are likely to continue pushing towards greater international authority in the future.
Stronger international organisations also invite contestation, which induces certain governments to devise strategies to circumvent those organisations they perceive to be overly authoritative. These trends could potentially weaken existing international organisations.
For much of the post-war period, international organisations have largely operated out of the limelight; however, this is changing as their authority increases. Policymakers should realise that international organisations' growing authority may fuel a political backlash that could lead to stagnation or even backsliding. While there are compelling reasons for deeper international collaboration in an interdependent world, political contestation has the potential to override them.
In: Internationale Politik: Politik, Wirtschaft, Recht, Wissenschaft, Kultur, Band 34, Heft 808, S. 8-10,19
ISSN: 0535-4129
Aus jugoslawischer Sicht
World Affairs Online
In: Russland-Analysen, Heft 175, S. 17-21
World Affairs Online
In: European journal of international relations, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 281-310
ISSN: 1460-3713
This article addresses the puzzle of why, and under what conditions, international organisations cease to exist. International Relations literature offers rich explanations for the creation, design and effectiveness of international institutions and their organisational embodiments, international organizations (IOs), but surprisingly little effort has gone into studying the dynamics of IO termination. Yet if we want to understand the conditions under which international organisations endure, we must also explain why they frequently fail to do so. The article formulates and tests a theory of 'IO death' using a combination of population-wide statistical analysis and detailed historical case studies. My analysis is based on an original dataset covering the period 1815–2016. I find that exogenous shocks are a leading proximate cause of IO terminations since 1815 and that organisations that are newly created, have small memberships, and/or lack centralised structures are most likely to succumb. My analysis leads me to suggest a number of extensions and refinements to existing institutionalist theories.
World Affairs Online
In: European journal of international relations, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 281-310
ISSN: 1460-3713
This article addresses the puzzle of why, and under what conditions, international organisations cease to exist. International Relations literature offers rich explanations for the creation, design and effectiveness of international institutions and their organisational embodiments, international organizations (IOs), but surprisingly little effort has gone into studying the dynamics of IO termination. Yet if we want to understand the conditions under which international organisations endure, we must also explain why they frequently fail to do so. The article formulates and tests a theory of 'IO death' using a combination of population-wide statistical analysis and detailed historical case studies. My analysis is based on an original dataset covering the period 1815–2016. I find that exogenous shocks are a leading proximate cause of IO terminations since 1815 and that organisations that are newly created, have small memberships, and/or lack centralised structures are most likely to succumb. My analysis leads me to suggest a number of extensions and refinements to existing institutionalist theories.