Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
The expansion of international jurisdiction
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 41, S. 546-566
ISSN: 0032-3195
Jurisdiction following seizure or arrest in violation of international law
In: American journal of international law, Band 28, S. 231-245
ISSN: 0002-9300
Jurisdiction Following Seizure or Arrest in Violation of International Law
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 231-245
ISSN: 2161-7953
It is well settled in Anglo-American law that national courts are
competent, in general, to adjudicate rights and duties with respect to all
things or persons found within the territory which the process of the court
controls. Exceptions find an especial justification in considerations of
national or international convenience. A situation which seems to have been
insufficiently considered, however, is presented by the case of the thing or
person which has been seized or arrested abroad, in violation of
international law, and brought within the state and thus within reach of the
process of the state's courts. Should the courts be considered competent, on
the basis of physical presence thus procured, to adjudicate in the usual
way?
International Criminal Jurisdiction
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 15, S. 62-69
ISSN: 2169-1118
Administrative law and administrative jurisdiction
In: Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Band 20, S. 99-104
Borderlines of National and International Jurisdiction
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 38, S. 40-60
ISSN: 2169-1118
Modern Chinese Law and Jurisdiction: Some Comments
In: Pacific affairs, Band 4, Heft 11, S. 975
ISSN: 0030-851X
The Expansion of International Jurisdiction
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 546-566
ISSN: 1538-165X
Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 233-255
ISSN: 2161-7953
The problem of jurisdiction is of even greater importance in international law than it is in the domain of municipal law. This may easily be understood because, up to the present, no international tribunal has been furnished with obligatory jurisdiction binding upon all States. In consequence, the judicial settlement of many international disputes depends upon the preliminary question whether any tribunal has jurisdiction over the case. Although since the foundation of the Permanent Court of International Justice at The Hague a tribunal invested with a very comprehensive jurisdiction exists, it is, nevertheless, significant that in many cases before the Permanent Court a plea to the jurisdiction has been raised with the obvious intention of preventing a legal decision on the merits.
The Law of Territorial Waters and Maritime Jurisdiction
In: Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 74
Modern Chinese Law and Jurisdiction: Some Comments
In: Pacific affairs: an international review of Asia and the Pacific, Band 4, Heft 11, S. 975
ISSN: 1715-3379
Some aspects of the jurisdiction of the Permanent court of international justice
In: American journal of international law, Band 30, S. 233-255
ISSN: 0002-9300
Jurisdiction with respect to crime: draft convention with comment, prepared by the research in international law of the Harvard law school
In: American journal of international law, Band 29, S. 437-651
ISSN: 0002-9300
Limits of the Jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 203-213
ISSN: 2161-7953
While I agree with the action taken by the Court and consider that, in view of the unsatisfactory and contradictory provisions of the special agreement by which the parties have submitted this case to the Court, it is perhaps the only course by which the Court could, under its Statute, aid the parties in arriving at a wholly satisfactory solution of their dispute, nevertheless, in view of certain language used in the order, which might be the source of doubt as to the limits of the jurisdiction of this Court and might serve as a basis of argument that it is within the competence of this Court, with the consent of the parties, to take jurisdiction of and decide purely political questions upon considerations of expediency without regard to the legal rights of the parties, I feel it incumbent upon me to make the following observations:In my opinion the question of the competence of this Court which has been raised by the present case and a direct decision of which the Court has avoided, for the moment at least, by the making of the present order, is, from the point of view of the future of this Court and the development of the judicial settlement of international disputes, by far the most important question which has ever been brought before the Permanent Court of International Justice. I feel, therefore, that I would be derelict in my duty if I allowed the question to be passed over in silence or left any doubt as to my opinion in regard thereto.