Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Titre -- Copyright -- Sur l'auteur -- À propos du livre -- Pour référencer cet eBook -- Table des matières -- Introduction. - Limitation, étatisation et « juridicisation » de la guerre à l'époque moderne (Thomas Berns / Juliette Lafosse) -- La doctrine de la guerre juste dans la pensée antique et médiévale (Merio Scattola) -- Guerre juste et guerre régulière dans la doctrine espagnole du XVIe siècle (Peter Haggenmacher) -- Hugo Grotius : le défi politique, la guerre juste, la paix (Hans W. Blom) -- De l'approche de la guerre par analogie aux lois de l'honneur chez Hobbes (Thomas Berns) -- Le problème de la guerre juste chez Leibniz et les fondements métaphysiques d'une politique perspectiviste (Quentin Landenne) -- Vers la paix perpétuelle ? Du droit des gens au droit cosmopolitique, un passage historique (Juliette Lafosse) -- La guerre contre-révolutionnaire : une juste guerre contre la guerre du droit ? Les paradoxes de la guerre totale contre la « révolution totale » (Jean-Yves Pranchère) -- Hegel et les trois justifications de la guerre (Louis Carré) -- La théorie moderne de la guerre juste - ou du justus hostis - et la pensée de l'ordre concret chez Carl Schmitt (Marie Goupy) -- La crise de juillet-août 1914, le changement de sens de la guerre et Le nomos de la Terre (Pierre-Yves Condé) -- Biographies des auteurs.

This article undertakes a serious assessment of Carl Schmitt's admonition: viz. that every war that makes a criminal of the enemy & claims to be waged in the name of justice will be a war of annihilation, more inhumane, more total, than traditional wars between equal States for political stakes. A close reading of texts in the theological tradition reveals a more contrasting picture of the doctrine of waging war for just cause: the just war is conceived of simply as exacting reparation for a perceived violation of law; the enemy is indeed viewed as a criminal, but his punishment does not mean his utter extermination; the just war is not a holy war & continues to be regarded as legal in essence. Adapted from the source document.

Includes bibliographic references. ; Appel d'un protestant au pape -- Lettre de M. Urquhart -- Lettre de Constantinople -- Lettre de Rell a un catholique sujet du sultan -- Projets de décrets synodaux de Constantinople -- De re militari et bello -- Addition proposée au catéchisme de l'Orient. ; Mode of access: Internet.

This paper aims at assessing the pacifist claim that the military licence to kill cannot be derived from the right to self-defense. Two clear-cut theories of self-defense, the causal theory and the strong moral theory, fuel two radically opposed conclusions. Indeed, the causal theory supports the classical Just War Doctrine (Walzer),while the strong moral theory supports pacifism. They are two extreme options among a complex set of possible theories of self-defense. I, nonetheless, defend the view that the strong moral theory does remain the most promising one. Whence it follows that, from the point of view of self-defense, pacifism is better established than the classical Just War Doctrine. This Doctrine may only be saved by endorsing rather some form of moral collectivism.

In this article we will analyse the main approaches to which the Putin doctrine refers. Russia presents itself to the international community as responsible for the sustainability of Russian civilisation and as leader of an opposition movement to Western civilisational imperialism. The EU is trying to diversify its international relations by developing new partnerships, in particular with China. However, the Russian military intervention alongside Bashar el Assad in Syria and the Ukrainian crisis largely undermine these efforts to build new alliances. While the new partnership with China is not called into question, its positioning as a pole of resistance to Western civilisational imperialism is at risk. The regained strength and opposition to the West's hegemonic claims are factors which largely explain President Putin's exceptional popularity. However, the Russian economy remains fragile and its modernisation is necessary to reduce its dependence on energy exports. However, this modernisation is expected to be difficult due to its new isolation from European dynamics. V. Putin will it be able to maintain its level of popularity despite a difficult economic situation? ; International audience In this article we will analyze the main approaches to which the Putin doctrine belongs. Russia presents itself to the international community as responsible for the protection and development of Russian civilization and as leader of a movement opposed to Western civilizational imperialism. Russia is trying to diversify its international relations by developing new partnerships, particularly with China. However, Russian military intervention alongside Bashar al-Assad in Syria and the Ukrainian crisis have largely undermined these efforts to build new alliances. If the new partnership with China is not challenged, on the other hand, its positioning as a pole of resistance to Western civilizational imperialism is compromised. The regained power and the opposition to the hegemonic policies of the West are factors that largely ...