THE JUST WAR DOCTRINE
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 71
ISSN: 0039-6338
48942 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 71
ISSN: 0039-6338
In: Open Journal of Political Science: OJPS, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 1-17
ISSN: 2164-0513
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 95, Heft 1, S. 83-96
ISSN: 0032-3195
A WIDELY HELD ASSUMPTION IS THAT INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS ARE DEVOTED TO THE EFFORT TO PREVENT WAR, AND DERIVE PUBLIC SUPPORT FROM THE HOPE THAT THEY WILL SUCCEED. THE ARTICLE SUGGESTS, RATHER, THAT INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS HAVE BEEN USED LESS FOR PREVENTING WAR THAN FOR CHARACTERIZING IT. THE ROLE OF THE UN AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR IMPLEMENTING THE 'JUST WAR' DOCTRINE IS DESCRIBED.
In: International studies review, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 324-326
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 95, Heft 1, S. 83-96
ISSN: 0032-3195
World Affairs Online
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 95, Heft 1, S. 83-96
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Australian Journal of Politics and History: Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 545-563, 2005
SSRN
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 545-563
ISSN: 0004-9522
In: Small wars & insurgencies, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 274-281
ISSN: 1743-9558
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 71-75
ISSN: 1468-2699
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 545-563
ISSN: 1467-8497
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 153-170
ISSN: 0963-8016
The applicability of traditional just war theory with contemporary states' struggles against terrorism is investigated. Overviews of traditional just war theory & of terrorism are provided, emphasizing the conditions under which the use of military force is permissible & the distinction between military force & terrorist actions; in addition, the extent to which just war theory has changed throughout the 20th century is discussed. Thomas Aquinas's criteria for rendering war morally permissible (eg, proper authority, just cause, & right intention) as articulated in his Summa Theologiae are then reviewed to illustrate how contemporary just war theory has incorporated or modified these conditions. Attention is then dedicated to determining whether states possess legitimate authority to respond to terrorism, whether responses to terrorist actions constitute just causes, & whether states are capable of employing right intent to answer terrorist activities. Even though states are morally obligated to protect the everyday lives of their citizens, it is concluded that struggles against terrorism also possess moral duties to achieve peace between warring parties. J. W. Parker
In: Small wars & insurgencies, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 274-281
ISSN: 0959-2318
In: Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 85-94
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 411-423
ISSN: 1502-7589