Suchergebnisse

The basis of this collection of essays is the reading of a common topic from different perspectives. The contributors compare and contrast not only positions, but also methods of learning. They examine theories of just war in diverse cultural contexts and their disciplinary settings

Intro -- Titre -- Copyright -- Sur l'auteur -- À propos du livre -- Pour référencer cet eBook -- Table des matières -- Introduction. - Limitation, étatisation et « juridicisation » de la guerre à l'époque moderne (Thomas Berns / Juliette Lafosse) -- La doctrine de la guerre juste dans la pensée antique et médiévale (Merio Scattola) -- Guerre juste et guerre régulière dans la doctrine espagnole du XVIe siècle (Peter Haggenmacher) -- Hugo Grotius : le défi politique, la guerre juste, la paix (Hans W. Blom) -- De l'approche de la guerre par analogie aux lois de l'honneur chez Hobbes (Thomas Berns) -- Le problème de la guerre juste chez Leibniz et les fondements métaphysiques d'une politique perspectiviste (Quentin Landenne) -- Vers la paix perpétuelle ? Du droit des gens au droit cosmopolitique, un passage historique (Juliette Lafosse) -- La guerre contre-révolutionnaire : une juste guerre contre la guerre du droit ? Les paradoxes de la guerre totale contre la « révolution totale » (Jean-Yves Pranchère) -- Hegel et les trois justifications de la guerre (Louis Carré) -- La théorie moderne de la guerre juste - ou du justus hostis - et la pensée de l'ordre concret chez Carl Schmitt (Marie Goupy) -- La crise de juillet-août 1914, le changement de sens de la guerre et Le nomos de la Terre (Pierre-Yves Condé) -- Biographies des auteurs.

Intro -- Table of Contents -- Table of Cases -- Table of Treaties Etc -- Table of National Instruments -- Introduction -- I. War and the Foundations of International Law -- II. A History of the Regulation of War under International Law -- III. Jus ad bellum and Contemporary International Law -- 1. The General Prohibition on the Use of Force -- I. Introduction -- II. The Status of the Prohibition under International Law -- III. The Scope and Content of the Prohibition on the Use of Force -- IV. The Content of the Prohibition on the Threat of Force -- 2. Consenting to a Use of Force by Another State -- I. Introduction -- II. The Lawful Donor of Consent -- III. The Expression of Valid Consent -- IV. Withdrawal of Consent -- V. Consent has no Bearing on the Duty to Respect Other Rules of International Law -- 3. Use of Force in Self-defence -- I. Introduction -- II. The Right of the State to Use Force in Self-defence -- III. Use of Force in Defence of Other States -- 4. United Nations Security Council Authorisation to Use Force -- I. Introduction -- II. The Role of the UN Security Council -- III. The Form and Content of a Council Authorisation to Use Force -- IV. Respect for the Terms of the Authorisation -- V. Security Council Authorisation and Regional Organisations -- 5. Use of Force and the Law of Neutrality -- I. Introduction -- II. The Origins of the Law of Neutrality -- III. The Modern Law of Neutrality -- 6. The Legality of Humanitarian Intervention -- I. Introduction -- II. The Notion of Humanitarian Intervention -- III. Humanitarian Intervention under International Law -- IV. The Content and Consequence of 'Responsibility to Protect' -- V. Rescue of Nationals as Humanitarian Intervention? -- 7. Responsibility for Aggression -- I. Introduction -- II. The Definition of Aggression -- III. State Responsibility for Acts of Aggression.

Gender, Justice, and the Wars in Iraq offers a feminist critique and reconstruction of just war theory. It points out gender biases in the just war tradition and suggests alternative jus ad bellum and jus in bello standards that emphasize women, political marginality, and empathy. Laura Sjoberg applies this feminist just war theory to analyze the wars in Iraq since the end of the Cold War

In this volume, a sequel to Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War, James Turner Johnson continues his reconstruction of the history of just war tradition by analyzing significant individual thinkers, concepts, and events that influenced its development from the mid-eighteenth century to the present. Originally published in 1984. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These paperback editions preserve the original texts

Institutionalizing the Just War provides a new approach to theorizing the morality of war and argues that sound moral principles regarding war-making must take into account the fact that the validity of moral principles can depend upon existing institutions and social practices.

Andrew Fiala's Against Religion, Wars, and States: The Case For Enlightenment Atheism, Just War Pacifism, and Liberal-Democratic Anarchism argues that we need to overcome the idea of the nation-state and look toward global justice, that we need to develop a more critical stance toward religion while embracing enlightened humanism and natural science, and that we need to look beyond violent solutions to social problems in order to build world peace

The just war tradition is central to the practice of international relations, in questions of war, peace, and the conduct of war in the contemporary world, but surprisingly few scholars have questioned the authority of the tradition as a source of moral guidance for modern statecraft. Just War: Authority, Tradition, and Practice brings together many of the most important contemporary writers on just war to consider questions of authority surrounding the just war tradition. Authority is critical in two key senses. First, it is central to framing the ethical debate about the justice or injustice

THIS ARTICLE DISCUSSES THE THEORY OF JUST WAR AND ITS PLACE IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA. IT BRIEFLY TRACES THE PHILOSOPHICAL HISTORY OF JUST-WAR THEORY AND ILLUSTRATES HOW IT HAS CHANGED DURING THE PAST THREE DECADES. THE ARTICLE ALSO ARGUES THAT RECENT CHANGES REFLECT CONTINGENT JUDGMENTS ON THE NATURE OF MODERN WAR THAT DO NOT MATCH THE CHARACTER OF CONTEMPORARY ARMED CONFLICTS. THE ARTICLE CONCLUDES BY SUGGESTING THAT JUST-WAR THEORY REMAINS RELEVENT TO THE CHALLENGES FACED BY STATESMEN TODAY.