Suchergebnisse

A methodological perspective on network and collaboration research / Joris Voets, Christopher Koliba and Robyn Keast -- Researching networks through sequential explanatory design / Bob Agranoff and Aleksey Kolpakov -- The case study in researching networks and collaborative arrangements / Ming Cheng and Joris Voets -- Survey approach / Ingmar van Meerkerk, Jurian Edelenbos and Erik-Hans Klijn -- Narrative inquiry in public network research / Jennifer Dodge, Angel Saz-Carranza and Sonia Ospina -- Methodology / Rob Kivits -- Researching inter-organizational collaboration using RO-AR / Siv Vangen -- Process tracing / Robyn Keast -- Social network analysis and dynamic network analysis / Robin Lemaire and J"rg Raab -- Qualitative comparative analysis in public network research / Denita Cepiku, Daniela Cristofoli and Benedetta Trivellato -- Using agent-based models to study network and collaborative governance / Christopher Koliba, Asim Zia and Scott Merrill -- Practitioners : what do they want to know? / John M. Kamensky -- Network and collaboration research futures / Dan Chamberlain and Ben Farr-Wharton -- Cross-cutting themes and opportunities for network and collaboration research / Robyn Keast, Christopher Koliba and Joris Voets.

Long description: Das Interesse an integrierten, flexiblen, sozialraumorientierten Arbeitsansätzen im Kontext der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe ist nach wie vor hoch und gegenüber den Anfängen vor mehr als zwei Dekaden eher noch gestiegen. Die hier versammelten Texte bieten die erste Gesamtübersicht über das Konzept »Integrierte, flexible Hilfen« in historischer, theoretischer und auf Implementierung orientierter Perspektive - nicht als Blaupause, aber als ein Konzept, das einen relativ bewährten Stand möglicher Reformen der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe in der Perspektive von Lebenswelt- und Sozialraumorientierung repräsentiert

BEPS Action 5 is one of the four BEPS minimum standards which all Inclusive Framework members have committed to implement. One part of the Action 5 minimum standard relates to preferential tax regimes where a peer review is undertaken to identify features of such regimes that can facilitate base erosion and profit shifting, and therefore have the potential to unfairly impact the tax base of other jurisdictions. This progress report is an update to the 2015 BEPS Action 5 report and the 2017 Progress Report. It contains the results of review of all BEPS Inclusive Framework members' preferential tax regimes that have been identified since the BEPS Project. The results are reported as at January 2019. In addition, the Inclusive Framework agreed on a new standard for substantial activities requirements for no or only nominal tax jurisdictions. This report includes the details of this new standard and the other work on additions to and revisions of the harmful tax practices framework. Finally it contains next steps for the work on harmful tax practices.