UMC has two editions of this title which differ in publisher statement, size of the seal on the t.p., size of books, headpieces and initials. ; Order to print on p. 399 dated: Die Lunae, 16 Julii, 1649. ; Order to print on t.p. dated: Die Martis, 17 Julii, 1649. ; Signatures: 3B-3U⁴, 3X⁴, 3Y². ; McAlpin Coll. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; MU: Pre-1801 imprint.
1 sheet ([1] p.) ; Dated at tnd: Dated this Saterday, 5. Nov. 1642. ; Title from caption and opening lines of text. ; Reproduction of original in the Society of antiquaries, London, England.
[148] p. ; Includes the proclamation of 23 April 1630. ; Signatures: pi⁴ A⁴ [par.]A⁴ B-Q⁴ R² . Variant: mostly composed of a reissue or reimposition of sheets or pages from "Foure statutes, specially selected and commanded by his Majestie to be carefully put in execution by all justices and other officers of the peace throughout the realme" (STC 9341); collation pi⁴ A⁴, "A5", B-I⁴, K1-2, K2-N4, M1-N3, P⁴ Q² ; pagination [18], 68, [16], 85-95, [1], 107-117, [1] p. For derivation of all sheets of this see STC. ; Reproductions of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery and Bodleian Library.
This manuscript was bound together for preservation purposes under the supervision of Town Clerk Frederick Yardley. It contains records of the activities and correspondence of the municipal government of the Town of East Hampton (N.Y.) between 1650 and 1669.
This article proposes a constitutional approach of the role of Government in Economy, and the principle of subsidiarity in the 1993 Peruvian Constitution. The proposal discusses the generally accepted notion of promotion in Public Law, as a reference to establish when Government can develop business activity within the framework of the 1993 Constitution. The discussion adopts the point of view of the Public Law to analyze the principle of subsidiarity of Government when it comes to developing business. ; El artículo propone una interpretación constitucional del rol promotor del Estado y del principio de subsidiariedad en la Constitución de 1993, sobre la base de la noción de fomento, generalmente aceptada por la doctrina, como criterio para establecer cuándo puede el Estado desarrollar actividad empresarial en el marco de la Carta Magna vigente. El análisis se desarrolla desde el punto de vista del derecho público y utiliza para ello el enfoque horizontal1 del principio de subsidiariedad.
1 sheet ([1] p.) ; Dated and signed at end: At the Councell of VVarre at White-Hall, the 12. of August. 1652. Ordered, that Commis: Gen: VVhalley, Col: Hacker, Col: Barkstead, Col: Okey, Col: Goffe, and Lieut. Col. Worsley doe present this petition to the Parliament tomorrow, on the behalfe of themselves, and the rest of the officers of the Army. Rich: Hatter, Secretary. ; Prays for reformation in the church, law, magistracy, excise, payment of public debt, arrears of pay, treatment of widows, public revenues, salaries, beggars, freedom of trades, &c. (With) a resolution of the Council of War, Whitehall, 12 Aug., appointing Com.-Gen. Whalley, Cols. Hacker, Barkstead, Okey, Goffe, and Lieut.-Col. Worsley to present it -- Cf. Steele. ; Annotation on Thomason copy: "August. 14th.". ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
[3+] p. ; Caption title. ; "Whereas in the first yeare of His Maiesties most happy raigne ouer this realme of England, an acte was made, for the charitable reliefe, and ordering of persons infected with the plague ."--First three lines of text. ; Place of publication and name of publisher taken from colophon; date of imprint suggested by STC (2nd ed.). ; Imperfect: torn with slight loss of print; lacking at least one sheet. ; Reproduction of original in the Harvard University Library.
1 sheet ([1] p.). ; Signed at end: Ed. Littleton C.S. Cottington. Hertford. Dorchester. Dorset. Hen. Dover. Chichester. F. Seymour. Edw. Nicholas. ; Reproduction of original in Bodleian Library.
1 broadside. ; This item appears at reel 1685:57 as Wing E1269 (number cancelled), and at reel 1700:2 as Wing E928. ; Reproduction of original in the Bodleian Library.
APPROVED ; The work which follows examines the process by which private actors in the digital market are redefining fundamental rights through their contractual terms and practical operation. The argument is allied to works which consider ?digital constitutionalism,? the idea that private actors in the digital market are increasingly displaying constitutional features through their contractual terms and documents. Unlike a majority of work in the area of digital constitutionalism the work does not argue that private actors setting rights based standards represents a positive development. Rather, the work argues that private actors, through their re-definition of public, normative standards are generating a body of rules and practices which have displaced democratically decided rights standards with negative consequences for individual autonomy and the Rule of Law. The work argues that this process has been enabled by three features of EU law and policy. The first is an approach of functional equivalence to laws governing the digital market. In accordance with this approach the digital market has been treated as equivalent to traditional markets and its participants are viewed as requiring no additional or supplementary protections or regulations. Of particular significance in functionally equivalent attitudes to the digital market is the Union?s deference to freedom of contract as part of an ordoliberal attitude to market regulation. While this attitude is now beginning to erode (to some extent) in the context of data protection it remains the dominant regulatory approach of the European Union in the digital market. The second feature, not unrelated to the first, is the Union?s preference for economic rather than socially orientated standards and protections in it policies as well as its secondary laws. As part of this preference, when fundamental rights cross the Rubicon from vertically enforced constitutional protections to horizontally enforceable legislative ones their content is transmuted in a manner which favours their economic over socially oriented aspects. The third feature, is what is referred to within the work as the Union?s brittle constitutionalism ? that is the Union?s hesitant and incomplete articulation of and commitment to rights enforcement. This feature is the result in part of the Union?s ambiguous and at times hostile attitude to the development of fundamental rights policy. The work examines the impact of these trends and the rise of private policy they have generated on the rights to privacy and property under the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
[2], 5, [1] p. ; "Ordered by the Commons in Parliament, that this ordinance be forthwith printed and published. Hen. Elsynge Cler. Parl. D.Com." ; Place of publication from by Wing (2nd ed.). ; Bound and filmed as 8th item with 2753:6-2753:15. ; Reproduction of original in: Trinty College (Dublin, Ireland) Library.
1 sheet ([1] p.) ; At end of text: Given at our court at Whitehal the first day of June, 1660. and in the twelfth year of our reign. ; Steele notation: Scotland whilest often; Arms 23. ; Reproduction of original in the Henry E. Huntington Library.
The M. H. Ross Papers contain information pertaining to labor, politics, social issues of the twentieth century, coal mining and its resulting lifestyle, as well as photographs and audio materials. The collection is made up of five different accessions; L2001-05, which is contained in boxes one through 104, L2002-09 in boxes 106 through 120, L2006-16 in boxes 105 and 120, L2001-01 in boxes 120-121, and L2012-20 in boxes 122-125. The campaign materials consist of items from the 1940 and 1948 political campaigns in which Ross participated. These items include campaign cards, posters, speech transcripts, news clippings, rally materials, letters to voters, and fliers. Organizing and arbitration materials covers labor organizing events from "Operation Dixie" in Georgia, the furniture workers in North Carolina, and the Mine-Mill workers in the Western United States. Organizing materials include fliers, correspondence, news articles, radio transcripts, and some related photos. Arbitration files consist of agreements, decisions, and agreement booklets. The social and political research files cover a wide time period (1930's to the late 1970's/early 1980's). The topics include mainly the Ku Klux Klan, racism, Communism, Red Scare, red baiting, United States history, and literature. These files consist mostly of news and journal articles. Ross interacted with coal miners while doing work for the United Mine Workers Association (UMWA) and while working at the Fairmont Clinic in West Virginia. Included in these related files are books, news articles, journals, UMWA reports, and coal miner oral histories conducted by Ross. Tying in to all of the activities Ross participated in during his life were his research and manuscript files. He wrote numerous newspaper and journal articles on history and labor. Later, as he worked for the UMWA and at the Fairmont Clinic, he wrote more in-depth articles about coal miners, their lifestyle, and medical problems they faced (while the Southern Labor Archives has many of Ross's coal mining and lifestyle articles, it does not have any of his medical articles). Along with these articles are the research files Ross collected to write them, which consist of notes, books, and newspaper and journal articles. In additional to his professional career, Ross was adamant about documenting his and his wife's family history in the oral history format. Of particular interest are the recordings of his interviews with his wife's family - they were workers, musicians, and singers of labor and folk songs. Finally, in this collection are a number of photographs and slides, which include images of organizing, coal mining (from the late 19th through 20th centuries), and Appalachia. Of note is a small photo album from the 1930s which contains images from the Summer School for Workers, and more labor organizing. A few audio items are available as well, such as Ross political speeches and an oral history in which Ross was interviewed by his daughter, Jane Ross Davis in 1986. All photographic and audio-visual materials are at the end of their respective series. ; Myron Howard "Mike" Ross was born November 9, 1919 in New York City. He dropped out of school when he was seventeen and moved to Texas, where he worked on a farm. From 1936 until 1939, Ross worked in a bakery in North Carolina. In the summer of 1938, he attended the Southern School for Workers in Asheville, North Carolina. During the fall of 1938, Ross would attend the first Southern Conference on Human Welfare in Birmingham, Alabama. He would attend this conference again in 1940 in Chattanooga, Tennessee. From 1939 to 1940, Ross worked for the United Mine Workers Non-Partisan League in North Carolina, working under John L. Lewis. He was hired as a union organizer by the United Mine Workers of America, and sent to Saltville, Virginia and Rockwood, Tennessee. In 1940, Ross ran for a seat on city council on the People's Platform in Charlotte, North Carolina. During this time, he also married Anne "Buddie" West of Kennesaw, Georgia. From 1941 until 1945, Ross served as an infantryman for the United States Army. He sustained injuries near the Battle of the Bulge in the winter of 1944. From 1945 until 1949, Ross worked for the International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, then part of the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), as a union organizer. He was sent to Macon, Georgia, Savannah, Georgia and to Winston-Salem, North Carolina, where he worked with the United Furniture Workers Union. He began handling arbitration for the unions. In 1948, Ross ran for United States Congress on the Progressive Party ticket in North Carolina. He also served as the secretary for the North Carolina Progressive Party. Ross attended the University of North Carolina law school from 1949 to 1952. He graduated with honors but was denied the bar on the grounds of "character." From 1952 until 1955, he worked for the Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers as a union organizer, first in New Mexico (potash mines) and then in Arizona (copper mines). From 1955 to 1957, Ross attended the Columbia University School of Public Health. He worked for the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund from 1957 to 1958, where he represented the union in expenditure of health care for mining workers. By 1958, Ross began plans for what would become the Fairmont Clinic, a prepaid group practice in Fairmont, West Virginia, which had the mission of providing high quality medical care for miners and their families. From 1958 until 1978, Ross served as administrator of the Fairmont Clinic. As a result of this work, Ross began researching coal mining, especially coal mining lifestyle, heritage and history of coal mining and disasters. He would interview over one hundred miners (coal miners). Eventually, Ross began writing a manuscript about the history of coal mining. Working for the Rural Practice Program of the University of North Carolina from 1980 until 1987, Ross taught in the medical school. M. H. Ross died on January 31, 1987 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. ; Digitization of the M. H. Ross Papers was funded by the National Historical Publications and Records Commission.