Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
In: 6(1) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 123-149 (2018)
SSRN
Working paper
In: The review of politics, Band 15, S. 538
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: CYIL - CZECH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: Public Policy and Ordre Public, pp. 117-147, A. Belohlavek & N. Rozehnalova, eds., JurisPublishing, Inc.,Huntington, New York, 2012, Vol. III
SSRN
In: St. John's Law Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: PS, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 410-418
ISSN: 2325-7172
In a self-consciously forward looking survey recently published in PS, Glendon Schubert continues to employ the phrase "public law" as roughly synonymous with the legal concerns of political science. The recent publication of Murphy and Tanenhaus' The Study of Public Law also reaffirms that, in spite of the movement toward "judicial behavior," which it might have been anticipated would change the boundaries of the field, the "public" in public law is still very much with those political scientists particularly concerned with things legal. There does not seem to me to be any valid reason why political scientists should maintain the public law—private law distinction and then proceed to exclude themselves from the "private" law sphere.
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 410-418
ISSN: 1537-5935
In a self-consciously forward looking survey recently published inPS, Glendon Schubert continues to employ the phrase "public law" as roughly synonymous with the legal concerns of political science. The recent publication of Murphy and Tanenhaus'The Study of Public Lawalso reaffirms that, in spite of the movement toward "judicial behavior," which it might have been anticipated would change the boundaries of the field, the "public" in public law is still very much with those political scientists particularly concerned with things legal. There does not seem to me to be any valid reason why political scientists should maintain the public law—private law distinction and then proceed to exclude themselves from the "private" law sphere.
ISSN: 1613-7663
ISSN: 0948-4396
In: Common market law review, Band 46, Heft 6, S. 1951-2000
ISSN: 0165-0750
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 46, Heft 6, S. 1951-2000
ISSN: 0165-0750
In the early days of Community law the ECJ, still sheltered from political constraints, was able to develop its jurisprudence on the EC fundamental freedoms with a view to enhancing the development of Community law and to advancing the Internal Market. More recently, however, the case law in the field of direct taxation has more and more come into the political limelight as fundamental tax policy questions and billions of tax revenue are at stake. As the Court's decisions also take account of the dynamic evolution of the Community's legal system and are much influenced by considerations of policy and economics, recent case law seems to put more emphasis on a cautious re-balancing of taxpayer rights under the fundamental freedoms and possibilities for Member States to justify restrictive tax measures on the basis of overriding public interest reasons. However, the Court's recent attempts have also warranted criticism from the perspective of legal certainty, due to the potential disregard of legal precedent and the concern that the Court might deviate from general Internal Market principles in this particular area. Against this background, the present contribution aims at systematizing the recent developments and dogmatic approaches underlying the body of case law in the field of direct taxation with respect to (acceptable and unacceptable) justifications of infringements on taxpayer rights to free movement and non discrimination.
1. Public administration and understanding public law -- 2. Constitutional concerns : government powers and individual rights -- 3. Policy, administration, and legislation -- 4. Courts and dispute resolution -- 5. Administrative practice and administrative law -- 6. Property law : public and regulatory aspects -- 7. Contracts and contracting -- 8. Torts actions and government considerations -- 9. Dynamic public administration and law.
In: Presidential studies quarterly: official publication of the Center for the Study of the Presidency, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 845-859
ISSN: 1741-5705
The U.S. president may act unilaterally in issuing executive orders within the office's inherent powers. To date, no cross‐time study has explored the relationship of his doing so with subsequent observed approval ratings. We do so here and estimate the relationship between the president's issuing of executive orders and subsequent job approval ratings at the aggregate level. While structural factors continue to explain long‐run approval rates, the president's use of unilateral powers also is associated through time with those rates, even when controlling for external factors such as wars and scandals. Thus, while some researchers may suspect that executive orders may undermine long‐term confidence in the institution of the presidency, we find that such uses of unilateral power may conditionally lead to gains in long‐term public opinion of the president.
In: Law, Public Health Care System and Society 2