Special Issue: Violence and Politics: State Violence and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (lgbt) Rights
In: New political science: a journal of politics & culture, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 61-76
ISSN: 0739-3148
4 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: New political science: a journal of politics & culture, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 61-76
ISSN: 0739-3148
In: South European society & politics, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 159-190
ISSN: 1743-9612
This essay analyzes the emergence of the Portuguese lesbian-gay-bisexual-transsexual (LGBT) movement, identifying actors, alliances, impasses, & possibilities for sexual emancipation in a dominantly & proudly Catholic & heterosexual society. The Portuguese LGBT movement has achieved some power & visibility in the socio-political field since the 1990s. After a decade in which LGBT rights seemed condemned to oblivion on the part of Portuguese legislation, on 15 March 2001, Parliament made history when it passed a law on common-law partnerships for all citizens, independent of their sexual orientation. Finally, I address whether this form of oppression contains potential for emancipation in its broader sense. 59 References. Adapted from the source document.
BACKGROUND: In 1990, the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT-UP) sparked a year long boycott of Philip Morris's Marlboro cigarettes and Miller beer. The boycott protested the company's support of Senator Jesse Helms (R-North Carolina), a leading opponent of AIDS funding and civil rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people. ACT-UP demanded that Philip Morris sever its ties with Helms and acknowledge its responsibility to the LGBT community and to people with AIDS. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the boycott on the LGBT community, the tobacco industry, and the tobacco control movement; and to determine what lessons tobacco control advocates can extract from this case. DATA SOURCES: Internal tobacco industry documents and newspaper archives. METHODS: Search of tobacco industry documents websites using "boycott", "ACT-UP", "gay", and other terms. RESULTS: Philip Morris used the boycott to its own advantage. It exploited differences within the community and settled the boycott by pledging large donations to combat AIDS. Through corporate philanthropy, Philip Morris gained entrée to the LGBT market without appearing gay friendly. Many LGBT organisations, thirsty for recognition and funding from mainstream corporations, welcomed Philip Morris's overtures without considering the health hazards of tobacco. CONCLUSIONS: Unless the goal of a boycott is to convince the tobacco industry to abandon tobacco altogether, such actions invite the industry to expand its marketing under the guise of philanthropy. Tobacco control advocates should be clear about goals and acceptable settlement terms before participating in a boycott of a tobacco company.
BASE
In: Sexual Cultures 31
"The claim 'I'm straight' is the psychosexual analogue of 'The check is in the mail': if you need to say it, your credit or creditability is already in doubt." So begins Paul Morrison's dazzling polemic, which takes as its point of departure Foucault's famous remark that sex is "the explanation for everything." Combining psychoanalytic, literary, and queer theory, The Explanation for Everything seeks to account for the explanatory power attributed to homosexuality, and its relationship to compulsory heterosexuality. In the process, Morrison presents a scathing indictment of psychoanalysis and its impact on the study of sexuality. In bold but graceful leaps, Morrison applies his critique to a diversity of examples: subjectivity in Oscar Wilde, the cultural construction and reception of AIDS, the work of Robert Mapplethorpe, the practice of bodybuilding, and the contemporary reception of the sexual politics of fascism. Analytical, witty and astute, The Explanation for Everything will challenge and amuse, establishing Paul Morrison as one of our most exciting cultural critics