Suchergebnisse

"This encyclopedia reviews and interprets a broad array of research on Latin American politics, including topics related to political institutions, processes, and parties; social movements; political economy; racial and gender politics; and Latin America's international relations. Under the editorial directorship of Harry E. Vanden and Gary Prevost and associate editors Jennifer Cyr, Kwame Dixon, Mary K. Meyer McAleese, Gabriel Ondetti, and Richard Stahler-Sholk, this publication brings together peer-reviewed contributions by leading researchers and offers the definitive resource for understanding contemporary politics in the region. As a result, the Oxford Encyclopedia of Latin American Politics is a necessary resource for students and as well as both new and established scholars"--

The context of Latin American politics -- The pattern of historical development -- Changing political culture -- Class, social structure, social change -- Interest groups -- Political parties -- Government machinery, the role of the state, and public policy -- The struggle for democracy in Latin America -- Conclusion : democracy in Latin America.

"The state can be defined, following sociologist Max Weber's (1946 [1919]: 78) classic formulation, as a "human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory." In other words, the state is an organization, differentiated from society, that is distinguished from other organizations in that it relies on the use, and the threat of the use, of coercion. It does not plead with citizens to follow the law - for example, by paying taxes. It commands citizens to do things and can coerce them to do these things. The state is a powerful organization, and it wields a kind of power that is distinct from that of economic and cultural organizations. Photo 1.2 connects this definition to the related concept of the Leviathan. We can use Weber's definition of the state to distinguish between communities that have states and stateless communities, which include communities with less specialized and elaborate political organizations such as bands, tribes, and chiefdoms (Service 1971). However, Weber's definition of the state encompasses city-states, empires, and modern states or national states - currently the dominant type of state around the world, including Latin America (Tilly 1990; Mazzuca 2021). Thus, to specify what a modern state or national state is, we should note that, in addition to meeting the criteria of Weber's definition, it has some features that neither city-states nor empires have. In contrast to a city-state, a modern state rules over several cities and rural populations; that is, modern states rule over large territories. In contrast to an empire, a modern state rules over a national population that has a political allegiance to the state but not over colonial subjects; that is, modern states rule over populations that share a common status as nationals of a country. See Figure 1.1 for a visual representation of these distinctions"--