Suchergebnisse

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Issuing and Analysis of Coherent Legislation SUMMARY When Lithuania retrieved her independence, the new life norms strongly affected protection of the inheritance. Former Soviet memorial security was evaluated as incongruous with Lithuanian reaches. Still in 1988 the movement created in Lithuania was interested in her historical past and raised problems associated with security of the heritage, analyzed its work. The opinion of the public changed radically. The object of the research – the law on protection of immovable cultural heritage and acts associated with it. The aim of the work – to analyze properly the law on protection of immovable cultural properties and compares it with the law of 1994. The task of the work: 1. to analyze an acceptance of the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties; 2. to compare the law of 1994 with the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties accepted in 2004; 3. to overlook under juridical acts of the law; 4. to analyze problems associated with implementation of the law. On the 13th of May in 2001 the government of Lithuanian Republic confirmed conception prepared by memorial security committee and Cultural ministry, which intended to create new security law of immovable cultural properties during 2001 – 2002. On the 28th of September in 2004 that law was accepted. It had been prepared for three years and was necessary for independent Lithuanian Republic. It was committed for the preservation of statehood and history – for children, our Lithuanian guests and us. One of the most important attitudes of new law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is the direct responsibility of the institutes and municipalities. The system created under this law allows to avoid extra reformation, warrants an accounting of cultural values, combines interests of the community and owners, urbanistic development and security of the inheritance. The Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is intended to secure predial cultural inheritance for future generations, to create conditions for community to know and use it, to give strong juridical base for preservation and security reform.

Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Issuing and Analysis of Coherent Legislation SUMMARY When Lithuania retrieved her independence, the new life norms strongly affected protection of the inheritance. Former Soviet memorial security was evaluated as incongruous with Lithuanian reaches. Still in 1988 the movement created in Lithuania was interested in her historical past and raised problems associated with security of the heritage, analyzed its work. The opinion of the public changed radically. The object of the research – the law on protection of immovable cultural heritage and acts associated with it. The aim of the work – to analyze properly the law on protection of immovable cultural properties and compares it with the law of 1994. The task of the work: 1. to analyze an acceptance of the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties; 2. to compare the law of 1994 with the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties accepted in 2004; 3. to overlook under juridical acts of the law; 4. to analyze problems associated with implementation of the law. On the 13th of May in 2001 the government of Lithuanian Republic confirmed conception prepared by memorial security committee and Cultural ministry, which intended to create new security law of immovable cultural properties during 2001 – 2002. On the 28th of September in 2004 that law was accepted. It had been prepared for three years and was necessary for independent Lithuanian Republic. It was committed for the preservation of statehood and history – for children, our Lithuanian guests and us. One of the most important attitudes of new law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is the direct responsibility of the institutes and municipalities. The system created under this law allows to avoid extra reformation, warrants an accounting of cultural values, combines interests of the community and owners, urbanistic development and security of the inheritance. The Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is intended to secure predial cultural inheritance for future generations, to create conditions for community to know and use it, to give strong juridical base for preservation and security reform.

Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Issuing and Analysis of Coherent Legislation SUMMARY When Lithuania retrieved her independence, the new life norms strongly affected protection of the inheritance. Former Soviet memorial security was evaluated as incongruous with Lithuanian reaches. Still in 1988 the movement created in Lithuania was interested in her historical past and raised problems associated with security of the heritage, analyzed its work. The opinion of the public changed radically. The object of the research – the law on protection of immovable cultural heritage and acts associated with it. The aim of the work – to analyze properly the law on protection of immovable cultural properties and compares it with the law of 1994. The task of the work: 1. to analyze an acceptance of the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties; 2. to compare the law of 1994 with the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties accepted in 2004; 3. to overlook under juridical acts of the law; 4. to analyze problems associated with implementation of the law. On the 13th of May in 2001 the government of Lithuanian Republic confirmed conception prepared by memorial security committee and Cultural ministry, which intended to create new security law of immovable cultural properties during 2001 – 2002. On the 28th of September in 2004 that law was accepted. It had been prepared for three years and was necessary for independent Lithuanian Republic. It was committed for the preservation of statehood and history – for children, our Lithuanian guests and us. One of the most important attitudes of new law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is the direct responsibility of the institutes and municipalities. The system created under this law allows to avoid extra reformation, warrants an accounting of cultural values, combines interests of the community and owners, urbanistic development and security of the inheritance. The Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is intended to secure predial cultural inheritance for future generations, to create conditions for community to know and use it, to give strong juridical base for preservation and security reform.

Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Issuing and Analysis of Coherent Legislation SUMMARY When Lithuania retrieved her independence, the new life norms strongly affected protection of the inheritance. Former Soviet memorial security was evaluated as incongruous with Lithuanian reaches. Still in 1988 the movement created in Lithuania was interested in her historical past and raised problems associated with security of the heritage, analyzed its work. The opinion of the public changed radically. The object of the research – the law on protection of immovable cultural heritage and acts associated with it. The aim of the work – to analyze properly the law on protection of immovable cultural properties and compares it with the law of 1994. The task of the work: 1. to analyze an acceptance of the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties; 2. to compare the law of 1994 with the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties accepted in 2004; 3. to overlook under juridical acts of the law; 4. to analyze problems associated with implementation of the law. On the 13th of May in 2001 the government of Lithuanian Republic confirmed conception prepared by memorial security committee and Cultural ministry, which intended to create new security law of immovable cultural properties during 2001 – 2002. On the 28th of September in 2004 that law was accepted. It had been prepared for three years and was necessary for independent Lithuanian Republic. It was committed for the preservation of statehood and history – for children, our Lithuanian guests and us. One of the most important attitudes of new law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is the direct responsibility of the institutes and municipalities. The system created under this law allows to avoid extra reformation, warrants an accounting of cultural values, combines interests of the community and owners, urbanistic development and security of the inheritance. The Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is intended to secure predial cultural inheritance for future generations, to create conditions for community to know and use it, to give strong juridical base for preservation and security reform.

This master paper "Constitutional Court and Legislation in Lithuania" is dedicated to analysis of Constitutional Court's participation in legislation procedure. In Lithuania as well as in other democratic countries it is important to ensure proper constitutional control in order to safeguard essential human rights and freedoms, constitutional regulation of the most important social relationship. In the Republic of Lithuania the constitutional control is perforemd by the Constitutional Court. In Lithuania the system of the institutional authority is based on the partition of powers. Every link of the authority system performs the functions which are assigned to it. In contemporary democratic states judicial authority acts as separate state authority independently from the legislative or the executive. Therefore this master paper raises a question how (if at all) the Constitutional Court influence the legislation. The Constitutional Court's functions, purposes, competence, its limits shall be seeked to be revealed herein while analysing relevant rulings of the Constitutional Court, actions of the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania (legal acts adopted), interdependence shall be seeked to be identified, i.e. whether Constitutional Court influences the legislation. The statistical data on the rulings adopted by the Constitutional Court and the ammendments of the laws adopted by the Parliament o the Republic of Lithuania shall be provided. First part of the paper is introduction. The second part analyses the competence of the Constitutional Court, its composition, order of constitution; the procedure of legislation and its association to Constitutional Court, what influence to legislation is made by the Constitutional Court is also discussed therein. The place of the Constitutional Court in the system of the partition of powers shall be also discussed. The third part provides statistic data of the Constitutional Court and the Parliament during period from year 2005 to 2008, discusses specific rulings of the Constitutional Court and their influence to legislation. Finally the conclusions are provided.

This master paper "Constitutional Court and Legislation in Lithuania" is dedicated to analysis of Constitutional Court's participation in legislation procedure. In Lithuania as well as in other democratic countries it is important to ensure proper constitutional control in order to safeguard essential human rights and freedoms, constitutional regulation of the most important social relationship. In the Republic of Lithuania the constitutional control is perforemd by the Constitutional Court. In Lithuania the system of the institutional authority is based on the partition of powers. Every link of the authority system performs the functions which are assigned to it. In contemporary democratic states judicial authority acts as separate state authority independently from the legislative or the executive. Therefore this master paper raises a question how (if at all) the Constitutional Court influence the legislation. The Constitutional Court's functions, purposes, competence, its limits shall be seeked to be revealed herein while analysing relevant rulings of the Constitutional Court, actions of the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania (legal acts adopted), interdependence shall be seeked to be identified, i.e. whether Constitutional Court influences the legislation. The statistical data on the rulings adopted by the Constitutional Court and the ammendments of the laws adopted by the Parliament o the Republic of Lithuania shall be provided. First part of the paper is introduction. The second part analyses the competence of the Constitutional Court, its composition, order of constitution; the procedure of legislation and its association to Constitutional Court, what influence to legislation is made by the Constitutional Court is also discussed therein. The place of the Constitutional Court in the system of the partition of powers shall be also discussed. The third part provides statistic data of the Constitutional Court and the Parliament during period from year 2005 to 2008, discusses specific rulings of the Constitutional Court and their influence to legislation. Finally the conclusions are provided.

The article discloses the most striking breaches of the constitutional requirements; these are the constitutional doctrine requirements to be met by the penal legislation. While working on the article, the authors analyzed some legal acts adopted by the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania and signed into law by the President of the Republic as of the year 2009. In the authors' opinion, in case of the penal legislation, the most often breached requirements are the ones deriving from the principle of the rule of law, such as: legal acts shall be clearly understandable so that the subjects of legal relationship are able to understand what requirements they have to meet according to the law; legal rules shall be stable and ensure legal certainty as well as predictability of legal decisions; the force of legal acts shall be directed to the future; the principle of equality shall be respected and the court shall have a possibility to personalize a sentence or penalty in every individual case, etc. In addition, the article provides insight into some objective and subjective factors which cause essential insufficiencies in penal legislation and considers possibilities of improving the quality of penal legal acts.

The article discloses the most striking breaches of the constitutional requirements; these are the constitutional doctrine requirements to be met by the penal legislation. While working on the article, the authors analyzed some legal acts adopted by the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania and signed into law by the President of the Republic as of the year 2009. In the authors' opinion, in case of the penal legislation, the most often breached requirements are the ones deriving from the principle of the rule of law, such as: legal acts shall be clearly understandable so that the subjects of legal relationship are able to understand what requirements they have to meet according to the law; legal rules shall be stable and ensure legal certainty as well as predictability of legal decisions; the force of legal acts shall be directed to the future; the principle of equality shall be respected and the court shall have a possibility to personalize a sentence or penalty in every individual case, etc. In addition, the article provides insight into some objective and subjective factors which cause essential insufficiencies in penal legislation and considers possibilities of improving the quality of penal legal acts.

Plato has noticed that the state is best when it is ruled by a philosopher, because such a ruler allows the wisest laws. Today wisdom is formalized in legislation. It can be linked to legislative projects in certain specialized institutions. The search for wisdom can also be found in public consultations, as they gather as much social information as possible so that decisions are more objective, comprehensive, fairer, and, moreover, more intelligent. It is debatable how to formalize the optimal ratio of law and quality to make it effective. The article discusses philosophy as a search for sources of wisdom and its manifestation in lawmaking.

Plato has noticed that the state is best when it is ruled by a philosopher, because such a ruler allows the wisest laws. Today wisdom is formalized in legislation. It can be linked to legislative projects in certain specialized institutions. The search for wisdom can also be found in public consultations, as they gather as much social information as possible so that decisions are more objective, comprehensive, fairer, and, moreover, more intelligent. It is debatable how to formalize the optimal ratio of law and quality to make it effective. The article discusses philosophy as a search for sources of wisdom and its manifestation in lawmaking.