"Habana 22 de mayo de 1885." ; This "bando" declares an "estado de sitio" in the province of Santiago de Cuba, specifies that individuals who fail to support the government will be considered hostiles, states that rebels will be tried under martial law, and indicates conditions of amnesty for all but the leaders of the rebellious forces. ; Ownership ink-stamp near upper-left corner: Comandancia Militar del Distrito de Bejucal.
"Amendments and new laws passed by the Legislature in 1896 and 1898 . complete to January 1, 1900": 48 p. between p. [226] and 227. ; Mode of access: Internet.
"The object of this publication is to supply legal practitioners with those rules of court, regulation under acts of Parliament, by-laws, etc., which are of general interest and practical; to supply, in effect, a reprint of so much of the Government gazette as concerns legal practice." ; Mode of access: Internet.
The book attempts "to present a general survey of the status of women in Iowa by pointing out the distinctions between men and women which have been established by law or sanctioned by judicial rulings." ; https://scholarworks.uni.edu/iowabooks/1013/thumbnail.jpg
[22] p. ; Dated on t.p. Remainder of imprint from colophon. ; Signatures: A⁸, B⁴ (last leaf blank). ; Initials. ; "Cum priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis ; Reproduction of originals in: Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery. ; The lawes of the markette -- The statutes of the streates of thys citie agaynst noisaunces -- Olde lawes and customes of thys citie.
Introduction. The article examines the ambiguity of the terms 'scientist', 'research associate' etc. in Russia and abroad, indicates the absence of a clear, regulation-backed definition of the concept of 'scientist' and emphasises the imperfection of the doctrinal approach to defining this term, reflected in the model legislation in particular. The study aims to analyse the legal status of scientists in Russia and abroad, considering the regulatory ambiguity and the existence of numerous adjacent terms. Methods. The methodological basis of the study is represented both by general scientific methods and specialised (legal) methods, as well as a set of concepts, approaches and principles relevant to the legal regulation of the status of actors involved in research activity in Russia and abroad. We also use the comparative legal method, which helps us draw a parallel between the legal status of Russian and foreign scientists. In turn, the formal legal method gets applied while analysing the current legislation and doctrinal approaches to the legal meaning behind the term 'scientist' and adjacent categories. The methods used do have some notable limitations: for instance, it is impossible to fully apply the formal legal approach. Results and Discussion. Based on the results of the study and assessment of the opinions of researchers that have already discussed similar issues, we arrive at three main conclusions. Firstly, in order to make terminology legally unambiguous, clear distinctions must be drawn between the names of essential science-related professions: scientist, researcher, educator etc. Secondly, the development of international research collaboration requires unified global standards that determine the legal status of scientists. Thirdly, we suggest improving the system of science funding to prevent the 'drain' of research personnel. Conclusion. We emphasise that the ongoing modernisation of national legislation on science is already making progress in bringing the legal status of scientists in Russia in ...
This comment discusses the history and characteristics of traditional status offense laws, demonstrates why the laws are a poor response to juvenile misbehavior, and examines proposals to improve them. In subsequently analyzing the new Washington laws that emphasize voluntary social services for rebellious children and their families, this comment concludes that the legislature, though implementing some of these proposals, failed to apply a consistently progressive approach to its new legislation. Inadequate protection for some children and inequitable application of provisions in the new laws may result. Finally, this comment suggests ways to improve the Washington legislation.
Message from the President of the United States transmitting the laws enacted by the . Philippine Legislature . with certain laws enacted by the Philippine Commission. ; Mode of access: Internet.
This article examines the eighteenth century case of Mohegan Indians v. Connecticut in order to determine its significance for arguments about the legal status of Aboriginal customary law and government in British North America. The article concludes that the Mohegan case confirms that in certain circumstances native nations on reserved lands in British colonies were subject, not to colonial jurisdictions established for settlers, but to their own traditional customs and institutions. It also concludes that the case is less clear than some recent commentators have suggested about whether British law recognized such nations as having rights of sovereignty.